user reviews of
Cavisson NetStorm & Tricentis NeoLoad

Updated NOVEMBER 2021

Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you. Would you like to learn about products from people using them now?

Download our FREE report comparing Cavisson NetStorm and Tricentis NeoLoad based on reviews, features, and more!

...and 17 more!

Where should we email your report?






Cavisson NetStorm review

reviewer1329360
Performance Architect at Kohl's
Has monitoring capabilities integrated into it to see the performance of...
NetStorm can generate high load with a single machine. Its Runlogic feature is very useful to send load to cover each and every flow of the application. NetStorm gives the feasibility of generating load with multiple load arrival models helping components to be tested based on its usage. NetStorm has monitoring capabilities integrated into...
Tricentis NeoLoad review

Patrik Badkar
Patrik Badkar
Technical Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Good licensing cost, user-friendly, and makes it easy and quick to create scripts
LoadRunner supports multiple protocols, whereas NeoLoad supports only three protocols. With NeoLoad, we can go for the SAP technology, web-based HTTP, and Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). If I have to simulate .NET application-based traffic, I won't be able to do that. So, protocol support is a limitation for NeoLoad. It should support more...

Since 2012, we've had 552,695 professionals use our research.

As seen in