User Reviews of IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) & WorkFusion

Updated March 2024

Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.

Download our FREE report comparing IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and WorkFusion based on reviews, features, and more!

Where should we email your report?






IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) review

Saman Guruge
Saman Guruge
Senior Engineer at MIT ESP
We can connect to different databases and use inbuilt activities, but we can't...
We can use its inbuilt activities, and it's a complete package, but just like ElectroNeek, a limitation is that we have to depend on its inbuilt activities. We can't include our own activities or we can't introduce other activities. When it comes to deployment and scheduling bots, there are some conflicts. They are using Microsoft MQ to...
WorkFusion review

Brock Miller
Brock Miller
Senior Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Helps improve our accuracy and compliance, but the analytics module can be...
Machine learning models for document-heavy processes have room for improvement because they require significant effort to train and update. WorkFusion can be easy to use for non-technical people. It has two modules: a workspace for analysts to use on a daily basis, and an analytics module for tracking throughput, recall, precision, and...

Since 2012, we've had 768,246 professionals use our research.

As seen in