User Reviews of Parasoft SOAtest & Telerik Test Studio
Updated March 2024
Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.
Download our FREE report comparing Parasoft SOAtest and Telerik Test Studio based on reviews, features, and more!
Where should we email your report?
Parasoft SOAtest review
Ajit Kumar Rout
Sr Quality Assurance Engineer at Wabtec Industrial
Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved
In general, this is a hassle free, user friendly tool and it doesn't require much knowledge if you're using the manual testing. Automated testing is also good but requires some knowledge in that field. It has some great features. It's a good tool compared to some of the other paid tools; input and output can be stored before extension and...
Telerik Test Studio review
Chirag N M
Senior Quality Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Supports multiple platforms and identifies elements in a good way
Instead of Telerik Test Studio, I'd recommend writing test cases in .Net so that in the future, if you move away from Telerik Test Studio to another tool, it would be easier for you. Your current code would be reusable. You won't have to change your test cases much. We wrote our code in a separate IDE, which was Visual Studio, and...
Since 2012, we've had 768,578 professionals use our research.
As seen in