Microsoft Defender for Cloud Reviews

Users have varied experiences with Microsoft Defender for Cloud. Some believe that it offers basic security features and is easy to install, without requiring specialized teams. Others find it expensive and haven't seen ROI yet, but believe that safety is the first priority. Some users have seen cost reductions and time savings, while others believe that Microsoft should incorporate it into the old security center products. However, many users have seen great returns on their investment and believe that it has helped them provide better security services to their customers and clients.

Microsoft Defender for Cloud can have a licensing cost of $15 per server per month. Some reviewers find the cost be a good deal while others find it to be too high. There are also additional costs for different plans and functionalities, and the pricing can be complicated due to different metrics and rules for each type of Defender for Cloud. However, some reviewers appreciate the simplicity and flexibility of the licensing model, which can be bundled with other Microsoft solutions and has no extra costs for standard features. While some reviewers find the cost to be justified by the importance of security, others suggest that it may be too expensive for small or startup businesses and recommend trying open source tools as an alternative.

• "I am not involved much with the pricing but the bundle offering is good."
• "Our clients complain about the cost of Microsoft Defender for Cloud."
• "The tool is pretty expensive."

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is used for a variety of purposes across different industries and company sizes. It is primarily used for identifying vulnerabilities and loopholes in the system, network security, managing customers' server vulnerability assessments, providing security scores, improving security posture, scanning for vulnerabilities, managing cloud security, and enforcing regulatory compliance. It is also used for incident security, threat analysis, and managing overall product compliance. The solution offers recommendations and security alerts, integrates with other Microsoft security products, and is deployed on multiple clouds, including hybrid and on-premises. It is a centralized solution that can be leveraged for infrastructure, platform as a service, or database as a service.

Some customers rate Microsoft Defender for Cloud technical support as good and responsive, while others criticize the lack of direct contact with Microsoft employees and dislike having to escalate issues to get proper solutions. A few users reported slow response and resolution time. Customers with a higher level of support or enterprise agreements with Microsoft report better experiences. Customers have found Microsoft's documentation to be helpful.

Deploying Microsoft Defender for Cloud is generally straightforward, with most reviewers reporting that it does not require much maintenance after deployment. The deployment time varies depending on the size of the company and. its requirements, but it is generally fast because Defender is a cloud-native tool. The solution is easy to enable and disable using the Azure app, and the agents are already present. Some reviewers noted that the setup process can be more complex if it involves older operating systems or if employees have no prior training.

The scalability of Microsoft Defender for Cloud is excellent and it can accommodate large environments without any issues. It is easy to use and manage, and it can be extended to multiple regions and on-premises. The solution is highly scalable and can be integrated with as many subscriptions as possible. The scalability potential is one of the biggest aspects that users like about the solution and it is designed to scan resources regardless of the volume every 30 minutes. However, increasing scalability can result in additional costs. The solution is very scalable and can accommodate all user requirements.

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is highly stable, with very minimal downtime and few reported issues. Some users have experienced slow performance, but this could be related to other factors such as internet connectivity. The solution's stability is praised by most users, with some rating it an eight out of ten. However, there are some areas for improvement, such as the need for better support for certain features and services.