The pricing for Jira is reasonable, although I think they can bring it down because the plugins cost extra. Jira Align, for example, is available at an additional charge. Jira should understand that there are now competitors in the market, and they should lower their prices to expand the user base. As sales volumes increase, the price should naturally be brought down. In this case, people are more likely to retain their licenses instead of switching to a more cost-effective solution.
I don't know the price of all the setups. Our clients pay for the setup, so our Jira users are covered by them. Of course, the price could always be cheaper.
Programme Manager - Major Programmes Office at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
2022-01-04T21:13:00Z
Jan 4, 2022
We pay a yearly licensing fee for an enterprise-level license. It's quite similar to the pricing that they have on their website. It's quite transparent from their site. They have a package that charges per user, however, they have some scalable packages, for zero to 10 users, from 10 to 20, from 20 to 50, and so on. You can choose, depending on the size of your company or the number of users. The costs are quite transparent. While everything is included in that package, the integration or the customization is a different fee. There's a project apart from the integrator, which may vary in cost.
ITBridging the gap between business and IT at a engineering company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
2021-10-29T15:12:59Z
Oct 29, 2021
The price at the moment for Jira is okay. I'm absolutely not amused with the plans to try to drive us to the cloud or to other licensing models. For the very simple reason that we are a company in the defense sector where cloud is problematic in a number of the domains. We are now approximately 60 users and the new policy will actually confront us with an upscale to approximately 500 users. I find it unacceptable, and may potentially lead us to look for another solution. They need to think about industries, which are for compliance reasons are not capable of moving to the cloud, and that they don't put a knife on our throats with excessive prices.
I don't deal with pricing, billing, or licensing. I can't speak to the exact cost of the solution. We likely pay a licensing fee as we have more than ten people using the solution, however, I can't say what the exact cost is.
IT Service Manager at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
2021-06-25T17:01:06Z
Jun 25, 2021
If you are using just Jira, it is cheap, but if you start to use it and you feel you need some more services or more functions, then you have to buy add-ons, which can make it expensive.
Software Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2021-06-03T17:06:59Z
Jun 3, 2021
There is an annual subscription fee based on the number of users. You can get a subscription for just 10 users, for small teams, and if you want more you can buy more. They have a standard and premium license.
Partner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Real User
2021-05-17T14:22:45Z
May 17, 2021
One of my customers told me that they were receiving better pricing for a similar tool from Microsoft. Specifically, the total cost of ownership was cheaper with Microsoft.
I can't speak to how much a license costs or the process behind setting one up and renewing it. I just use the solution. I don't handle sales or billing.
Start with requirement. If requirement requires tight security and confidentiality, it is highly recommended to employ expert assistance. Whereas if the requirement is agile in nature and is at very initial stages, it is best to start leveraging open source to some extent.
Consultant at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2020-10-26T12:35:59Z
Oct 26, 2020
The pricing is fair. Right now, I'm using the solution for my small projects. For example, I'm using the Jira Cloud and Confluence Cloud, which are pretty nice. For small teams, it's a very, very interesting option.
I don't have an opinion on the pricing or licensing. It's not really a main concern of mine. I don't have access to any information about what the company pays.
Senior Quality Assurance at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
2019-05-09T13:13:00Z
May 9, 2019
Licensing is on a monthly basis, and it is based on what you use. There is a base cost and then as you include other items, the cost rises. Our last payment was perhaps $1600, which includes both user licenses and add-ons. There are no additional costs beyond the licensing fees, and it covers support.
It should be very clear about the plan that you want to implement and what number of users will use it. In this way, you will pay for what you really need and will cover your needs since this software is based on the number of users implementing the same plan.
Jira is a powerful cloud- and subscription-based application lifecycle and issue management solution. It is designed to aid users both in project management and in resolving any issues that arise at any point in the software development process. It is especially concerned with easing the ability of developers to collaborate.
Jira Benefits
Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Jira include:
DevOps lifecycle visibility and planning. Jira provides...
I use a monthly subscription. We can opt for an annual subscription if we go through a reseller.
The tool's pricing is reasonable.
Compared to the value Jira provides, it’s not that expensive. It has an yearly licensing cost.
It's not very cheap. It's also not very costly. I'd rate it a five out of ten in terms of pricing.
It is subscription-based, and we probably pay yearly. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of price.
The pricing for Jira is reasonable, although I think they can bring it down because the plugins cost extra. Jira Align, for example, is available at an additional charge. Jira should understand that there are now competitors in the market, and they should lower their prices to expand the user base. As sales volumes increase, the price should naturally be brought down. In this case, people are more likely to retain their licenses instead of switching to a more cost-effective solution.
There is an annual subscription to use Jira.
I don't know the price of all the setups. Our clients pay for the setup, so our Jira users are covered by them. Of course, the price could always be cheaper.
The price of Jira is reasonable.
The licensing model for enterprise users is costly. We have more than 2000 users and it is becoming expensive to use.
We are on an annual license to use Jira.
We pay a yearly licensing fee for an enterprise-level license. It's quite similar to the pricing that they have on their website. It's quite transparent from their site. They have a package that charges per user, however, they have some scalable packages, for zero to 10 users, from 10 to 20, from 20 to 50, and so on. You can choose, depending on the size of your company or the number of users. The costs are quite transparent. While everything is included in that package, the integration or the customization is a different fee. There's a project apart from the integrator, which may vary in cost.
Pricing of licensing is too high.
We don't pay for licensing because we are using the Open Source version.
The price at the moment for Jira is okay. I'm absolutely not amused with the plans to try to drive us to the cloud or to other licensing models. For the very simple reason that we are a company in the defense sector where cloud is problematic in a number of the domains. We are now approximately 60 users and the new policy will actually confront us with an upscale to approximately 500 users. I find it unacceptable, and may potentially lead us to look for another solution. They need to think about industries, which are for compliance reasons are not capable of moving to the cloud, and that they don't put a knife on our throats with excessive prices.
There are other solutions that are free making this solution seem expensive in comparison.
The ballpark figure is about $100 a month.
Its price is good and similar to other products. It is about five or six dollars per user.
I'm not involved in the licensing aspect.
I don't deal with pricing, billing, or licensing. I can't speak to the exact cost of the solution. We likely pay a licensing fee as we have more than ten people using the solution, however, I can't say what the exact cost is.
We currently have ten users, and it is free for ten users. However, we hope to increase usage.
If you are using just Jira, it is cheap, but if you start to use it and you feel you need some more services or more functions, then you have to buy add-ons, which can make it expensive.
I am not in a position to comment on licensing costs.
We pay an annual licensing fee.
There is an annual subscription fee based on the number of users. You can get a subscription for just 10 users, for small teams, and if you want more you can buy more. They have a standard and premium license.
We have an enterprise license that includes cloud service and support.
One of my customers told me that they were receiving better pricing for a similar tool from Microsoft. Specifically, the total cost of ownership was cheaper with Microsoft.
Its price is fine, but we would like it to be less expensive. We are paying on a yearly basis.
I can't speak to how much a license costs or the process behind setting one up and renewing it. I just use the solution. I don't handle sales or billing.
While, of course, in general, we always want the pricing to be lower, it's pretty reasonable. The costs aren't too bad.
For up to 10 users, the solution is free but above that there are licensing costs.
We are using the Community license for Jira since we are a not-for-profit organization.
We are using the enterprise license which is nice because it ensures that we always have the latest versions of Jira software.
We've found the pricing to be quite good. It's not overly expensive. It's very reasonable and affordable for companies to implement.
As a company, we get a subsidized price, and it's lower than what's quoted on their website.
I use the free version of the solution. We don't pay for it at all.
I don't deal with the financial aspect of the product. I cannot comment on if it is overly expensive or not as I don't handle billing or payments.
It is not too expensive. It is just comparative to other tools like Microsoft Teams.
Start with requirement. If requirement requires tight security and confidentiality, it is highly recommended to employ expert assistance. Whereas if the requirement is agile in nature and is at very initial stages, it is best to start leveraging open source to some extent.
Right now the price is fair but once they move to the cloud, that model may not be attractive anymore.
The cost of Jira is okay. It's better than Azure DevOps. We don't have any licensing fees that I know of.
The pricing is fair. Right now, I'm using the solution for my small projects. For example, I'm using the Jira Cloud and Confluence Cloud, which are pretty nice. For small teams, it's a very, very interesting option.
I don't have an opinion on the pricing or licensing. It's not really a main concern of mine. I don't have access to any information about what the company pays.
I am not involved in the pricing. We have a sales team to procure our licenses. I don't feel that price is an issue.
The solution is quite expensive. I'm not sure of the exact pricing, however, I know it's not cheap.
I don't handle the finance side of our relationship with Jira.
To try this solution, use their cloud offering to get familiar. After that, it's in my view worth the money.
Licensing is on a monthly basis, and it is based on what you use. There is a base cost and then as you include other items, the cost rises. Our last payment was perhaps $1600, which includes both user licenses and add-ons. There are no additional costs beyond the licensing fees, and it covers support.
We feel that the product is a good value for the cost.
It should be very clear about the plan that you want to implement and what number of users will use it. In this way, you will pay for what you really need and will cover your needs since this software is based on the number of users implementing the same plan.