The solution is very expensive. It is a part of my enterprise database. I am paying a subscription for it. It doesn't cost for hardware but for other tools to use.
The main problem with this solution is collaboration between teams. If you want to involve the other teams you'll have to buy Project Light servers or enable the project team members to collaborate inside the plan itself. This is an extra cost to the standard license. We also have a license for the planner and the teams, but we need some integration between all of them. The professional and premium licenses are quite expensive.
Senior Manager at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
2022-09-01T15:26:50Z
Sep 1, 2022
A different department handled the licensing. I can't speak to exact costs. There is expense in the case of maintenance. If you need some person to maintain it, since it's an on-prem solution, that's a cost. You can't measure it, however, it's a cost. It's also expensive to scale.
The price of the Microsoft Project Server could improve, it is expensive here in Africa. When comparing Microsoft Project Server to Oracle Primavera for us, Microsoft Project Server is quite cost-effective.
Project Manager at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
2021-08-27T21:09:12Z
Aug 27, 2021
I'm not quite sure about the licensing costs. We're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of about 80,000 to 90,000 a year for our current on-prem because we handle our own licensing. As far as Project Online is concerned, we're still trying to get a good handle on that. It looks like it is going to be in a neighborhood of about 120,000 to 150,000 a year, but we're getting a lot more capability out of it. We have an enterprise agreement. We've got a pretty large enterprise using the whole suite of Microsoft products. We have probably somewhere in the neighborhood of 2,600 to 2,800 people who are using either Microsoft OS, Microsoft Office, Microsoft Exchange, or something along that line.
The solution offers a subscription-based pay-as-you-go model. Now that everyone has moved to the online version, it is my understanding that the approximate cost comes to around $350 to $400 USD per month. I see or close to $4,000 to $5,000 USD per annum.
IT Project Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2021-02-06T03:12:03Z
Feb 6, 2021
I don't have any experience with the pricing or licensing of the solution. I'm not sure what the costs are. It's not a part of my job to worry about the licensing.
While the solution is less expensive than Broadcomm's Clarity, it more expensive than Planview. That said, I'm unsure of the exact pricing or how often we pay licensing.
SAP FI Consultant; Project Management Consultant at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Consultant
2020-08-26T07:13:23Z
Aug 26, 2020
The pricing of the solution is reasonable. It's not outrageously expensive. Our finance department handles the billing, therefore, I'm unsure as to if we pay monthly or yearly and what the overall costs are.
Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
2020-08-05T06:59:27Z
Aug 5, 2020
We're Microsoft customers. We don't have a business relationship with the company. The solution is only a single cost per seat. There isn't a monthly or yearly subscription. It's only a few hundred dollars. It's pretty inexpensive. There aren't any costs in addition to the standard fees.
Project Manager at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
2019-03-04T14:34:00Z
Mar 4, 2019
Engage an experienced and highly rated vendor to help in the discovery and planning of the implementation. Project Server is better priced than many of the higher-end project management solutions.
Microsoft Project Server 2013 is a flexible on-premises solution for project portfolio management (PPM) and everyday work. Team members, project participants, and business decision makers can get started, prioritize project portfolio investments and deliver the intended business value from virtually anywhere. Requires SharePoint 2013, sold separately.
The solution is very expensive. It is a part of my enterprise database. I am paying a subscription for it. It doesn't cost for hardware but for other tools to use.
The product is expensive.
The technical assistance is expensive but the solution is an open source software.
We pay an annual licensing fee for the solution.
There are some payments related to the licensing cost of Microsoft Project Server.
It is an inexpensive product. We purchase its yearly license.
I would rate the price a six out of ten.
The pricing is affordable. It's not overly expensive.
The pricing is moderate. Something like Primavera is more expensive.
The main problem with this solution is collaboration between teams. If you want to involve the other teams you'll have to buy Project Light servers or enable the project team members to collaborate inside the plan itself. This is an extra cost to the standard license. We also have a license for the planner and the teams, but we need some integration between all of them. The professional and premium licenses are quite expensive.
Microsoft Project Server is more expensive than other solutions on the market. We purchase the license annually.
A different department handled the licensing. I can't speak to exact costs. There is expense in the case of maintenance. If you need some person to maintain it, since it's an on-prem solution, that's a cost. You can't measure it, however, it's a cost. It's also expensive to scale.
There is a subscription model for different types of users for different types of roles.
There is an annual license required for this solution.
It's not subscription-based, we purchased the on-premises version. Everything can always be cheaper.
The price of the Microsoft Project Server could improve, it is expensive here in Africa. When comparing Microsoft Project Server to Oracle Primavera for us, Microsoft Project Server is quite cost-effective.
I'm not quite sure about the licensing costs. We're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of about 80,000 to 90,000 a year for our current on-prem because we handle our own licensing. As far as Project Online is concerned, we're still trying to get a good handle on that. It looks like it is going to be in a neighborhood of about 120,000 to 150,000 a year, but we're getting a lot more capability out of it. We have an enterprise agreement. We've got a pretty large enterprise using the whole suite of Microsoft products. We have probably somewhere in the neighborhood of 2,600 to 2,800 people who are using either Microsoft OS, Microsoft Office, Microsoft Exchange, or something along that line.
I cannot comment on the price as I was not responsible for purchasing the solution.
There is a licensing cost.
The solution offers a subscription-based pay-as-you-go model. Now that everyone has moved to the online version, it is my understanding that the approximate cost comes to around $350 to $400 USD per month. I see or close to $4,000 to $5,000 USD per annum.
I don't have any experience with the pricing or licensing of the solution. I'm not sure what the costs are. It's not a part of my job to worry about the licensing.
While the solution is less expensive than Broadcomm's Clarity, it more expensive than Planview. That said, I'm unsure of the exact pricing or how often we pay licensing.
It is on the expensive side.
The pricing of the solution is reasonable. It's not outrageously expensive. Our finance department handles the billing, therefore, I'm unsure as to if we pay monthly or yearly and what the overall costs are.
We're Microsoft customers. We don't have a business relationship with the company. The solution is only a single cost per seat. There isn't a monthly or yearly subscription. It's only a few hundred dollars. It's pretty inexpensive. There aren't any costs in addition to the standard fees.
Engage an experienced and highly rated vendor to help in the discovery and planning of the implementation. Project Server is better priced than many of the higher-end project management solutions.
It may be considered expensive, but it has features that cannot be bought by other rivals, so cost does not matter.
The licensing was procured before my involvement.