What is your primary use case for Microsoft Project Server?

We use the solution for centralized project management for departments seeking to consolidate project dependencies, manage master projects, manage resource planning, handle incomplete tasks, and more.

The solution was used to prepare documentation and manage the project timelines and schedules. We used the tool for documentation control and project management. We can manage and create budgets, timelines, and schedules. We can know when we are lagging, when we are on time, when we have to change the resources, or when we have to manage our resources differently. We can get all the reports from the software. We used the solution to manage multiple projects.

Most of the servers from Microsoft are used because of internal stakeholders' demands. With Dynamics 365, my company used an ERP tool. My company uses Microsoft Project Server as a tool to run various projects.

The main use case was related to task management, involving the assignment of tasks across departments. It provided visibility into individual performance, allowing for team member invitations, and monitored key performance indicators.

We often require customization of our checklist, which is not web-based. We have also integrated it into mobile devices. This serves both clinical and Social Security functions, as well as management information systems.

New resources working on the development site as project managers need to deploy some services and install the project on Microsoft Project Server. And I go to the yeah. They can use the online portal or the desktop version of the solution through an email login.

I use Microsoft Project Server for basic product deployments involving API.

I've spent the last five years as the Director of Consultations for a firm that specializes in Microsoft project implementation. Our clients include significant corporations from all throughout Russia. During this time, my daily responsibilities were around project oversight and working as a project manager, particularly for implementation projects. I also served as the architect for these solutions. We have been using the latest version, both on-premises and cloud which is particularly famous in Russia.

I primarily use the solution for plans and projects. I use it to handle timelines and scheduling. It's primarily used for project implementation. We use it to improve and keep track of project status.

When it comes to enterprise projects, we need a consolidated environment where we can interlink all project management activities, including the cost, resources, timeline, and the whole landscape of project management and portfolio management. We needed enterprise resource planning, and we implemented this for the organization.

I am using Microsoft Project Server for managing projects, such as all the tasks-related activities are tracked.

Currently, we are helping a government entity with their PMO portfolio. They have many departments and streams. The main Microsoft Project Server use case for them is managing the planning for all the projects within the workflows, monitoring the projects inside the dashboards of the PMO and processing all the workflows for the project initiation, charter, and deliverables.

Everyone in the company has projects, and everyone needs approvals from everyone in the company. They need to handle approvals, rejections, cost estimates, project timelines, et cetera. This is an investment company, and all of the projects and related items are handled by Microsoft Projects and Power BI. This solution allows the CEO to see what's happening in subsidiaries in the company.

We are basically using it for project monitoring, scheduling, and resource utilization. We have some custom reports, in which we have used SQL server reporting services.

We use this solution for project management for the whole company different teams in different locations.

We mainly use this solution for project management planification. I'm an external consultant and manager in enterprise transformation.

We use Microsoft Project Server for everything to do with projects management, such as portfolio and program management.

We are not providing this solution, we use it. Microsoft Project Server helps us to manage our project plan.

We are using it for building Research and Development Project labs.

My clients are mostly using Microsoft Project Server for infrastructure-type projects management as a scheduling tool.

I am a Project Server Administrator and BI Analyst. I work extensively with Microsoft Project Server. We are currently on the 2013 on-prem version, which is currently two versions back. We are in the process of migrating to Project Online, which will in the Microsoft cloud. We use Project Server to track enterprise-level projects and implement projects. As a financial institution or credit union service organization, we have over 1,800 member credit unions. We use Project Server to manage our enterprise projects where we're building, modifying, and maintaining products, which are then implemented by our implementations teams. They use Project Server for their checklists and for their project management during implementations. We also use it to track costs in our enterprise projects.

We are currently using the 2001 version. We use the solution for projects, with the goal of it being shared with more users, who can employ it as a single tool.

We use this solution for reports for our project and program management.

My organization handles IT consulting and services. That's primarily how the organization is managed. The use case for this solution was to set up the resource development unit and manage the investment cost, scheduling, budgeting, and some of those new initiatives that were supposed to happen in the R&D division. That was why we were looking for a portfolio management product. We found that Project Server could be a way to visualize and govern the entire program for the client.

We primarily use the solution to manage the project lifecycle. Generally the lifestyle starts at demand phase. We design a workflow according to customer's needs. The workflow starts with project ideation and project selection, if the project fits company criteria it will move onto the project management phase. Let's say you have 10 projects and you don't know which ones to move into actual project management phase. Customers use the portfolio and analysis feature of Project Server, and decide which project to do according to capacity planning(if they have the resources) and budget. If the company has enough resources then its the projects with most benefit that gets selected. For the selected projects lifecycle will continue. As it moves forward, you will get more project detail pages, more things to work with. This will also produce some reports as well.

We primarily use the solution to track milestones on our project.

We primarily use the solution based on its mobility. I can use it online or via mobile phones or anywhere I can get internet access.

We use it for master project scheduling, that is, the first schedule of each project.

We primarily use the solution to plan our projects.

We primarily use the solution purely for project management. Basically, we use it to do project plans or schedules for our smaller or medium-sized projects.

* Project metrics * Document management * Financial reporting * Resource management. We use the data collected to manage project data, create and manage assignments and schedule via MS Project connectivity. We also track the current and future assignments for our resource to determine their availability and workload for current and future endeavors.

Our primary use case of this solution is as a portfolio of projects. It helps us keep track of the private projects.

Our primary use case would be to reset out projects online during the process and be able to use the Project Pro to run or exhibit projects which are already planned as part of the process of project management.

We use it for managing our internal projects, for tracking the status and progress of our projects in terms of schedules - that they are delivered on time - and that the expenditure is controlled.