2018-06-19T08:17:00Z

What needs improvement with Endevor?

Julia Miller - PeerSpot reviewer
  • 0
  • 9
PeerSpot user
11

11 Answers

DC
Real User
Top 20Leaderboard
2023-10-03T09:20:11Z
Oct 3, 2023

The product’s implementation process is complicated and restrictive. It is difficult to find file programs and use a different tool for the setup as the compilation process is all locked up, at least in our implementation. We might switch to MySQL for the same reason.

Search for a product comparison
HB
Real User
Top 20Leaderboard
2023-09-04T12:44:00Z
Sep 4, 2023

The main challenges are its limited interface and the complexity of the customization. The user interface may seem outdated and affect user experience.

Efrén Yanez - PeerSpot reviewer
Real User
Top 10Leaderboard
2023-05-09T20:04:00Z
May 9, 2023

If I had to comment on an area of ​​improvement or something new in the next or future version, I would like to see AI-assisted coding and impact analysis for mainframes. It is actually a fairly complete product. It is robust with a solid history and is always growing in functionality. It has a high level of maturity, which benefits the users and the administrators. This tool, with its group of options, facilitates the integration with other business processes, which allows you to take advantage of other solutions by incorporating automatic functions.

MB
Real User
Top 20Leaderboard
2023-05-08T09:10:05Z
May 8, 2023

Endevor can improve parallel development.

LS
Real User
Top 20Leaderboard
2023-04-10T12:22:12Z
Apr 10, 2023

The scalability of Endevor could improve.

GD
Real User
Top 20Leaderboard
2023-03-08T14:22:55Z
Mar 8, 2023

Concurrent development has room for improvement. The cost of the solution has room for improvement. The initial setup can be less complex and has room for improvement.

Find out what your peers are saying about Endevor vs. Visual Studio Team System and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
JS
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
2023-01-18T18:29:14Z
Jan 18, 2023

The solution is very good and prevalent in larger organizations, but the solution can be improved by integrating more smoothly with the open world.

Michael Burgun - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant
Top 20Leaderboard
2022-10-12T07:36:57Z
Oct 12, 2022

The solution can improve its parallel development, unlike more distributed source management systems like GIT or PVCs. It is more oriented towards single control of the source.

GP
Real User
2022-01-31T17:29:13Z
Jan 31, 2022

There should be better integration between CA Endevor Software Change Manager and Zowe.

SG
Real User
2021-02-10T09:04:15Z
Feb 10, 2021

I would like to have better integration with other products. It's impossible to work in parallel mode with the source. For example, we have one check for many banks and you can't change the parallel source for different projects.

JB
Real User
2018-06-19T08:17:00Z
Jun 19, 2018

One feature of Endevor is its Backout feature. If there is a problem, it can back out the executables. The only problem with that is that it will not back out the source in Endevor. For example, you can do a back out and it will back out the executable to the previous version, but it doesn't back out the source version in Endevor. It would make it much better if when you did a back out of Endevor, it would back out both the source and the executable and keep them in sync. Right now, if you do a back out and you leave it out, you have to sync the source code back in Endevor. That can be a challenge.

Endevor vs. Visual Studio Team System comparison
Find out in this report how the two Software Configuration Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Download Endevor vs. Visual Studio Team System comparison ReportRead more