IT Program Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
2023-11-02T17:22:08Z
Nov 2, 2023
Alluvio AppResponse should improve its ability to expand across multiple operating systems. Alluvio AppResponse should include the ability to monitor Linux servers.
If Alluvio AppResponse reduces its cost, it will be more beneficial for customers to monitor their application and network performance. Additionally, integrating more features for application monitoring and focusing more on security threat monitoring would be even better.
Senior Performance and Architecture Analyst at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2021-06-16T19:37:18Z
Jun 16, 2021
The AI features should be addressed in respect of the analysis and intelligence that must be supported and delivered in the tool to predigest the large amounts of data.
Solutions Expert at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Reseller
2020-10-14T06:37:00Z
Oct 14, 2020
I'm not sure if I see room for improvement at this point. It works quite well for us. I'm not sure what other vendors offer, so it's hard for me to look at it and see things that may be missing from the offering. The pricing is on the higher side of things. If they could lower it, that would be ideal.
We often have problems when it comes to integration with products from other vendors. With the products we sell, we are often looking to build holistic solutions. Technical support needs to be more responsive.
Find out what your peers are saying about Riverbed, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
There is always room for improvement. I would say improving the user interface is the most important. Also, faster support for some new security features and support for the secure key exchange. There have been a lot of changes in the last few years with the names in Riverbed. SteelCentral used to be called Cascade. Every two years they change the name of the products. Somebody who is new, or even not so new, needs time to remember the names. This is not something crucial to do and when something is good and working well, why should they just rename it?
Alluvio AppResponse should improve its ability to expand across multiple operating systems. Alluvio AppResponse should include the ability to monitor Linux servers.
If Alluvio AppResponse reduces its cost, it will be more beneficial for customers to monitor their application and network performance. Additionally, integrating more features for application monitoring and focusing more on security threat monitoring would be even better.
Integration between NPM and APM solutions would improve efficiency. There is no agent on the server site related to AppResponse.
The AI features should be addressed in respect of the analysis and intelligence that must be supported and delivered in the tool to predigest the large amounts of data.
I'm not sure if I see room for improvement at this point. It works quite well for us. I'm not sure what other vendors offer, so it's hard for me to look at it and see things that may be missing from the offering. The pricing is on the higher side of things. If they could lower it, that would be ideal.
We often have problems when it comes to integration with products from other vendors. With the products we sell, we are often looking to build holistic solutions. Technical support needs to be more responsive.
There is always room for improvement. I would say improving the user interface is the most important. Also, faster support for some new security features and support for the secure key exchange. There have been a lot of changes in the last few years with the names in Riverbed. SteelCentral used to be called Cascade. Every two years they change the name of the products. Somebody who is new, or even not so new, needs time to remember the names. This is not something crucial to do and when something is good and working well, why should they just rename it?