JBoss ESB vs Mule ESB vs Oracle Service Bus comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Red Hat Logo
593 views|525 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
MuleSoft Logo
7,428 views|6,102 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
4,042 views|2,805 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between JBoss ESB, Mule ESB, and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB).
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is very easy to use. I can download the trial version and just give it a go."

More JBoss ESB Pros →

"I like that it's user-friendly. Compared to other ESBs, I find it easier to use. I like it better than other ESBs. I like the connectors, which make calling the APIs through the routers easier.""It's open source, and there are a lot of community resources. Mule ESB makes it easy to connect to other software applications.""The solution improved my company by modernizing the way we offer services and improving the user experience.""It is easily deployable and manageable. It has microservices-based architecture, which means that you can deploy the solution based on your needs, and you can manage the solution very easily.""I like that Mule ESB provides fast and good technical support.""The most powerful feature is DataWeave, which is a powerful language where data can be transformed from one form into another.""I'm not using ESB directly. It is the integration layer, so it's running under the hood. However, the conversion and transformation performance is excellent. Anypoint Enterprise Security is also solid.""The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot."

More Mule ESB Pros →

"I like the ease of deployment and the ease of implementation.""The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered.""We've been pleased with the level of technical support.""It is stable.""Service Bus is good at routing the transformation.""The ability to master the process in one location.""The interface is fine and the solution is quite robust.""The most valuable feature is the adapters."

More Oracle Service Bus Pros →

Cons
"The EPA, from what I understand, lacks a lot of features and it doesn't really know how to interface with legacy systems or how to develop APIs for legacy systems."

More JBoss ESB Cons →

"MuleSoft is not so strong in method-based integration, so they're not so functional in that regard.""The solution's setup needs to be a bit more straightforward and its support needs to respond faster.""The solution isn't as stable as we'd like it to be. There are some ongoing issues and therefore Mule has to provide frequent patches. Mule's core IP should be more stable overall.""One area that could be improved is the way that policies are propagated when APIs are moved from one environment to another. It's an issue, but when you develop and test the rest APIs in a lower environment and need to move them, there's a propagation process. This process moves certain aspects of the APIs, like the basic features. But when we move them, the policies don't always move with them. The policies should be able to move so we don't have to redo them manually. There are some APIs we use, but it's a bit tedious.""In an upcoming release, I would like to see more additional concept for exception handling, batch processing, and increased integration with other application.""It needs more samples. Also, the dependency on Maven should be removed.""Mule ESB isn't as secure as IBM. Financial companies go with IBM for that reason.""Limitation on external subscribers to listen to the messages on the bus."

More Mule ESB Cons →

"There are issues, especially if you want to create some compensation in your service bin.""The weak point of OSB is the single point of failure.""What needs improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the connectivity between adapters such as the Salesforce adapter and database adapters. The limited number of adapters compatible with Oracle Service Bus makes you want to switch to a different solution.""There are times when I select components in composite and they do not appear, and I cannot figure out why.""The inconvenient part about working with this product is that it's very heavy, requiring a lot of people and a lot of resources.""An area for improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the roadmap for its product launch. Currently, it's unclear, so Oracle should develop a roadmap for version 12c, so people can see what's coming out of that version of Oracle Service Bus. Cloud hosting is an additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Oracle Service Bus.""This solution should work better with RESTful services.""It would be ideal if they could optimize it a bit."

More Oracle Service Bus Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "This is expensive. In my next project, we had to go to other vendor."
  • "Plan your licensing model (cloud or on-premises or hybrid) that will allow seamless integration with new partners."
  • "The various features and components for this solution are no longer free."
  • "The licensing is yearly, and there are additional fees for services."
  • "This product is cheaper than some offered by other vendors, although there is a problem because you have to pay for some third-party adapters."
  • "Most of the challenges that I had with this solution were for smaller customers. There is not a good licensing model or pricing model. It is more expensive than other solutions, and that's the downside of MuleSoft. I had to be creative to be able to sell it to the business, but we did. This is something they have to work on because for large companies, it's affordable, but for small and medium businesses, it's very hard to sell."
  • "This product is expensive, but it does offer value for money."
  • "I think the price is very high. If you use TIBCO BW, the license is for the CPU usage, then the IPS, and support. I also think the license for the product is a one-time expense."
  • More Mule ESB Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of this solution is better than the subscription-based Mule ESB."
  • "This is a very expensive product and the price varies depending on factors such as the number of processors and the number of users. Our licensing fees are approximately $300,000."
  • "We have an unlimited yearly license."
  • "I'm not aware of how much Oracle Service Bus costs."
  • "The pricing is on the higher side."
  • More Oracle Service Bus Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using… more »
    Top Answer:Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the… more »
    Top Answer:The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot.
    Top Answer:The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered.
    Top Answer:The pricing is on the higher side. I would rate it ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:There is significant room for improvement in the monitoring capabilities. Enhancing this aspect of our monitoring… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    593
    Comparisons
    525
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    7,428
    Comparisons
    6,102
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    371
    Rating
    8.1
    Views
    4,042
    Comparisons
    2,805
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    459
    Rating
    7.2
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    JBossESB is the next generation of EAI - better and without the vendor-lockin characteristics of old. As such, many of the capabilities mirror those of existing EAI offerings: Business Process Monitoring, Integrated Development Environment, Human Workflow User Interface, Business Process Management, Connectors, Transaction Manager, Security, Application Container, Messaging Service, Metadata Repository, Naming and Directory Service, Distributed Computing Architecture. Plus JBossESB is part of an SOI (Service Oriented Infrastructure). However, SOA is not simply a technology or a product: it's a style of design, with many aspects (such as architectural, methodological and organisational) unrelated to the actual technology.
    For companies looking to modernize and unlock the value of existing on-premises systems and applications, an enterprise service bus (ESB) architecture serves as a critical foundation layer for SOA. When deployed as an ESB, the Mule runtime engine of Anypoint Platform combines the power of data and application integration across legacy systems and SaaS applications, with a seamless path to the other capabilities of Anypoint Platform and the full power of API-led connectivity.

    Oracle Service Bus transforms complex and brittle architectures into agile integration networks by connecting, virtualizing, and managing interactions between services and applications. Oracle Service Bus delivers low-cost, standards-based integration for mission critical SOA environments where extreme performance, scalability and reliability are critical requirements.

    Oracle Service Bus enables companies to use the values of their enterprise applications portfolio. From on-premise, to the cloud to mobile devices, Service Bus allows companies to leverage their existing investments in new ways by extending the performance and scalability leadership of Oracle SOA and API Management.

    Sample Customers
    Rancore, Sprint, ResMed, Brazil's Ministry of Health, ING Services Polska
    Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot
    MakeMyTrip Ltd., Griffith University, Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Pacfico Seguros Generales, IGEPA IT-SERVICE GmbH, Guangzhou Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau, Pacfico Seguros Generales, Bank Audi S.A.L., Rydges Sydney Airport, Intelligent Pathways, Nacional Monte de Piedad IAP
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Government14%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company46%
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Non Tech Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise74%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise54%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.