Aurea CX Messenger vs Mule ESB vs Oracle Service Bus comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea Logo
325 views|93 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
MuleSoft Logo
7,428 views|6,102 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
4,042 views|2,805 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger, Mule ESB, and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB).
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all.""The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need.""The Messenger Broker is a really good feature.""SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required.""The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages.""The solution offers excellent stability."

More Aurea CX Messenger Pros →

"The cloud and integration abilities are most useful allowing us to use applications such as Salesforce and DataWeave.""The most valuable feature is the Salesforce integration.""What Mule provides out-of-box is a sufficient product.""It is easily deployable and manageable. It has microservices-based architecture, which means that you can deploy the solution based on your needs, and you can manage the solution very easily.""The most valuable features of Mule ESB are its ease of use, documentation, ease to adapt to newer security and vulnerabilities, and a lot of help available. Additionally, there is a lot of flexibility, many patches available, and they provide APIs. They are a market standard.""The solution offers multiple deployment options.""It's open source, and there are a lot of community resources. Mule ESB makes it easy to connect to other software applications.""The most valuable feature is that it's programmer-friendly, so it's very easy to develop APIs."

More Mule ESB Pros →

"This product is not complicated and very easy to learn.""Supports multiple protocol technologies and web services.""The most valuable feature of this solution is that you can connect with different applications.""I am a part of the software developing team and I mainly use this solution for the integrating applications.""The communication between applications is already defined, which means that you don't have to redefine your service infrastructure at the lower level.""We've been pleased with the level of technical support.""The solution is quite stable overall. We haven't witnessed any performance issues so far.""Its ease of use is valuable. It's very easy to use. It's no code/low code. Oracle Middleware products are also rich in adapters."

More Oracle Service Bus Pros →

Cons
"The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services.""I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included.""It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc.""The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API.""You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely.""Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"

More Aurea CX Messenger Cons →

"One area that could be improved is the way that policies are propagated when APIs are moved from one environment to another. It's an issue, but when you develop and test the rest APIs in a lower environment and need to move them, there's a propagation process. This process moves certain aspects of the APIs, like the basic features. But when we move them, the policies don't always move with them. The policies should be able to move so we don't have to redo them manually. There are some APIs we use, but it's a bit tedious.""It would be great to see implementing security modules as a feature.""It would be much more beneficial if the solution included AI and business process management.""Mule ESB isn't as secure as IBM. Financial companies go with IBM for that reason.""I would like to see support for BPM in the next release of this solution.""It should have some amount of logging.""From the product perspective, it was sometimes hard to manage the dependencies. When we had to add dependencies on a couple of different packages, it was sometimes confusing. It was hard to update them with Anypoint Studio, as well as with MuleSoft. There were challenges with that. So, that's one of the areas that could be improved.""The stability could be improved."

More Mule ESB Cons →

"Security needs to be more integrated.""We have faced a problem with the heap memory side, but that is stable now.""This solution would benefit from having more cloud-based adapters.""The initial setup is likely complex for many organizations.""The connectivity with the solution is an area that needs to be improved. On occasion, requests are lost due to losing connectivity.""There are issues, especially if you want to create some compensation in your service bin.""It's very complex and hard to learn. There's a steep learning curve.""This solution should work better with RESTful services."

More Oracle Service Bus Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Much better than Oracle SOA Suite."
  • "You pay nothing for licensing, because the commercial model is a subscription. Other environments, such as QA and Development, are included in the subscription"
  • "The pricing is not so high."
  • More Aurea CX Messenger Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This is expensive. In my next project, we had to go to other vendor."
  • "Plan your licensing model (cloud or on-premises or hybrid) that will allow seamless integration with new partners."
  • "The various features and components for this solution are no longer free."
  • "The licensing is yearly, and there are additional fees for services."
  • "This product is cheaper than some offered by other vendors, although there is a problem because you have to pay for some third-party adapters."
  • "Most of the challenges that I had with this solution were for smaller customers. There is not a good licensing model or pricing model. It is more expensive than other solutions, and that's the downside of MuleSoft. I had to be creative to be able to sell it to the business, but we did. This is something they have to work on because for large companies, it's affordable, but for small and medium businesses, it's very hard to sell."
  • "This product is expensive, but it does offer value for money."
  • "I think the price is very high. If you use TIBCO BW, the license is for the CPU usage, then the IPS, and support. I also think the license for the product is a one-time expense."
  • More Mule ESB Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of this solution is better than the subscription-based Mule ESB."
  • "This is a very expensive product and the price varies depending on factors such as the number of processors and the number of users. Our licensing fees are approximately $300,000."
  • "We have an unlimited yearly license."
  • "I'm not aware of how much Oracle Service Bus costs."
  • "The pricing is on the higher side."
  • More Oracle Service Bus Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The Messenger Broker is a really good feature.
    Top Answer:The pricing is not so high. I will rate it a seven out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the highest. There are… more »
    Top Answer:The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services because the earlier version is not using web… more »
    Top Answer:I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using… more »
    Top Answer:Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the… more »
    Top Answer:The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot.
    Top Answer:The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered.
    Top Answer:The pricing is on the higher side. I would rate it ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:There is significant room for improvement in the monitoring capabilities. Enhancing this aspect of our monitoring… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    325
    Comparisons
    93
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    456
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    7,428
    Comparisons
    6,102
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    371
    Rating
    8.1
    Views
    4,042
    Comparisons
    2,805
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    459
    Rating
    7.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ
    Learn More
    Aurea
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

    For companies looking to modernize and unlock the value of existing on-premises systems and applications, an enterprise service bus (ESB) architecture serves as a critical foundation layer for SOA. When deployed as an ESB, the Mule runtime engine of Anypoint Platform combines the power of data and application integration across legacy systems and SaaS applications, with a seamless path to the other capabilities of Anypoint Platform and the full power of API-led connectivity.

    Oracle Service Bus transforms complex and brittle architectures into agile integration networks by connecting, virtualizing, and managing interactions between services and applications. Oracle Service Bus delivers low-cost, standards-based integration for mission critical SOA environments where extreme performance, scalability and reliability are critical requirements.

    Oracle Service Bus enables companies to use the values of their enterprise applications portfolio. From on-premise, to the cloud to mobile devices, Service Bus allows companies to leverage their existing investments in new ways by extending the performance and scalability leadership of Oracle SOA and API Management.

    Sample Customers
    Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage
    Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot
    MakeMyTrip Ltd., Griffith University, Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Pacfico Seguros Generales, IGEPA IT-SERVICE GmbH, Guangzhou Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau, Pacfico Seguros Generales, Bank Audi S.A.L., Rydges Sydney Airport, Intelligent Pathways, Nacional Monte de Piedad IAP
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Insurance Company6%
    Government5%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company46%
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Non Tech Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise54%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.