We performed a comparison between PeopleFluent Talent Management, PeopleSoft, and PeopleStrong based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Talent Management."This solution is extremely flexible and the automation capabilities are great."
"The breadcrumb approach to navigation in PeopleSoft is good. nVision is also a good supplement."
"Stability-wise, it is a good tool."
"I often say that PeopleSoft's greatest feature is how customizable it is."
"I use the reporting feature occasionally to check for potential improvements in timesheets. We have integrated it with Power BI."
"Flexibility in configuration."
"This solution integrates very well with other products which is helpful."
"It is a customizable product. We can customize it based on our needs, which is one of the features that I like about PeopleSoft. As far as financial accounting is concerned, the user interface is very good. You can also configure Chart of Accounts for all performance insights."
"The recruiting is most valuable. It saves time in having easy and fast applicants tracking as well as candidates' contact plus pipeline management."
"The mobile responsiveness is strong."
"The UI and UX are fantastic."
"The hiring process is good. It will create a process-oriented procedure in terms of hiring, promotion, the movement of people, and other related HR tasks."
"The product has valuable flexibility for customization, user interface, and search capabilities."
"Some of the most valuable features are the onboarding experience of new employees, the employee service portal, and the entire performance management system."
"PeopleStrong Alt is flexible because it allows customization and the user's experience is very good."
"The integration capabilities could be improved."
"We have already deployed it and we have had it for several years but we are switching to a modern HCM SaaS cloud product."
"The biggest disadvantage with things like PeopleSoft is that they do continuous support and fixes and upgrades. You get to choose when you want to implement that upgrade. However, in order to keep up, you have to upgrade."
"I would like to see improvement in the UI."
"There can occasionally be complexity in the initial setup."
"PeopleSoft lacks integration capabilities."
"The area that could be improved is the upgrade process, it's not the easiest. Oracle stopped supporting our version. So we have to move either to the cloud or work in a non-supported situation. That was certainly a disadvantage. That's also the reason why we decided not to stay with Oracle. Now we are moving to SAP."
"PeopleSoft can improve by having proper connectors. It's very difficult to change some interfaces with the other systems."
"I think the inventory part it should be simplified. There is the GR, or good receipt note, which is the time that the materials comes in, and the work days, etc. There is a lot of shuffling through pages, which creates a lot of problems for our users. They don't know which page to go to, where to create a GR, or where to create a stock entry. In other words, all the information is very daunting. It's very easy for people to understand and get a better clarity over it."
"They could improve talent management capabilities."
"They had challenges getting the performance management system up and integrated with our systems."
"The solution's workflow can improve by adding more customization at the organizational level."
"It would be helpful if you could work offline because sometimes, we have problems with internet connectivity."
"They could include a sort of collaborative platform where employees are able to work together with a chat mechanism like WhatsApp and video chat."
"The global scalability and support could improve."
More PeopleFluent Talent Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points