We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, PeopleSoft, and SYSPRO based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP."We do a straight forward, simple plug and play installation so there are no problems technically now."
"Access and visibility of different business processes on a single UI."
"With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are financial reporting, procurement, and project management."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perfect for our reporting for the management, workflow, and procurement workflow."
"Its user interface and ease of navigation are valuable."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are the flexibility of the configuration, it is highly configurable. It is not rigid as other solutions, such as SAP. They have recently added a custom workflow approach and approval workflows."
"It is easy to inquire about any account in our company."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to use."
"The integration between Human Capital Management (HCM) and PeopleSoft is an important feature."
"We use a lot of typical cases from PeopleSoft, for example, solutions for security, business performance, monitoring processes, and a lot of training."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is having the sources so that you're able to adapt the product to your needs. That was a big benefit."
"The most valuable feature is ERP application information."
"The solution's scalability is good."
"Peoplesoft is the best payroll software in the market."
"PeopleSoft is resilient and has the flexibility for us to customize it."
"The Financial Accounting module, in general, is quite good. It is quite simple but powerful. Similarly, the Manufacturing functionality, including a multiple level bill of materials, is also quite useful."
"They need to improve the logs and need to write some sort of script that clears logs after so many days."
"Financial side could be expanded by bringing in things like the IMS."
"Treasury management is typically used in forex, loans, trade management and property management is not available. The solution could improve if they added them."
"Needs better integration with IoT solutions."
"Lacking in certain areas of support."
"From the operation perspective, it could offer more functionality for the APIs."
"The only issue with the solution that it yet to consider improvements in its price."
"The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics."
"My developers want to use more HTML instead of the specialized tool, PeopleTools because, they say, it's better from a user perspective."
"One aspect where PeopleSoft could see improvement is in its level of customization."
"The implementation of PeopleSoft is quite complex and is not as easy as other cloud products such as SuccessFactor or Workday."
"On the other hand, the more recent push for standardization precludes customized approaches to certain industry requirements."
"Stability is an area where the solution lacks and needs to be improved."
"Agile system configurations to accommodate business dynamics."
"There can occasionally be complexity in the initial setup."
"The Time and Labor module is not that flexible."
"SYSPRO at the moment is lacking on the project side. There's a module called Projects and Contracts, and it's a poorly designed module. One of my clients is a project-based organization, and they're finding it extremely difficult to manage their business using SYSPRO, to the point that they're looking at alternative solutions. The Projects and Contracts module is not a very useful tool. It does project accounting reasonably well, but in terms of putting in proper structures, like a work breakdown structure and so forth, it's actually quite poor. Their design or their architecture for the Projects module isn't good enough. They need to redesign it and redevelop it. They have made improvements. However, the problem is that if you're building on a bad foundation, then your building isn't going to be very strong. That's principally their problem. Any heavy equipment company would have a requirement to keep their equipment available for production. In that sense, SYSPRO has no maintenance management functionality. There's also no functionality for field services management. These two functionalities are critical for places like mines or for heavy equipment manufacturers who service the aftermarket and so forth. From a product perspective, this obviously isn't a good place to be because they are sort of taking themselves out of the market for quite a number of industries. They are constrained to manufacturing and distribution."
Earn 20 points
