We performed a comparison between Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL], Mule Anypoint Platform, and SAP Process Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware."There were no concerns with the stability. This product is very good from a stability perspective."
"When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."
"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."
"It's easy to develop APIs."
"The community manager is the standout feature of the Mule Anypoint Platform, as it provides a platform to showcase your API to external parties. It is exceptionally user-friendly and enables external parties to easily utilize and consume the APIs."
"The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."
"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."
"The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."
"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."
"The monitoring is one of the greatest features in Process Orchestration because it is user-friendly and easy for somebody who is not experienced."
"Great monitoring tools and has its own alert framework."
"The solution is stable."
"It is strategically focused to forecast a global integration platform for our business."
"The monitoring tools are the most valuable feature."
"Process Orchestration fulfils the need for middleware to mediate types of connectivity."
"The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable."
"The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity."
"I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME)."
"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."
"MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having better integration with MDM. There are challenges when doing the interaction at this time."
"In order to set up a storefront, we currently rely on a third-party solution. It would greatly enhance our operations if this feature was integrated into their existing solution."
"Mule should have better B2B integration."
"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."
"It has different types of subscriptions. For platinum or lower subscriptions, there are not too many things that can be done. We don't see many features. They should release a basic version that has logging and monitoring features. These features should come with Mule Anypoint Platform for free instead of making customers pay separately for these features. Its dashboard can be improved to have a lot of charts so that it is easy to visualize information. The utilization part can be improved. The dashboard is good currently, but it can be better. Other solutions like Elastic have a good dashboard, and they allow you to administer the product from the UI. Currently, for RTF, there is a different dashboard or utility. It would be good to include the same utility in the cloud solution. It would be good if there is a centralized repository that includes the links to the information about various troubleshooting issues. The documentation is there currently, and it is good, but the troubleshooting information is too scattered. We have to go to different links to find troubleshooting information. This kind of centralized repository would be helpful for new customers who are implementing this solution. It will be helpful to see different kinds of issues that can occur."
"The usability is an area where it can be improved upon."
"In terms of technical support, it would be helpful if they handled the tickets a bit faster when queries are sent to them."
"The older version of the solution will no longer be supported."
"It's very difficult to find errors in a simple way."
"I think the main area that SAP PO should improve on is offering pre-delivered content like they do when you use SAP Cloud Platform Integration (CPI). SAP should not forget that they still have a lot of customers using Process Orchestration and they should focus more on providing pre-delivered content in SAP PO."
"The cloud capability features need improvement."
"The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved."
"SAP Process Orchestration could improve from an API standpoint. This is not an API management tool, which is one of its drawbacks. However, SAP has released an SAP Cloud Platform Integration which has all of the features, such as API management along with process integration to replace what they had previously."
Earn 20 points
