We performed a comparison between Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL], Mule Anypoint Platform, and Oracle BI Applications based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware."There were no concerns with the stability. This product is very good from a stability perspective."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"It can scale."
"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."
"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."
"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."
"The flexibility has been great overall."
"Calculations are a little bit faster. It can do the on-the-run calculations much better than other reporting platforms. You don't need any other specific tool. You can use Microsoft Office to start doing things with these reports."
"It has a very robust dashboard and ad-hoc reporting."
"It's web-based so that I can have multiple users accessing the same data. It provides ease of use and its formatting means we can use the data, export it to Excel, and we manipulate the data afterward if we need to."
"The most valuable features are the reporting and the graphics."
"I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME)."
"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."
"The compatibility with vendors can be improved. Microsoft Azure heavily uses single software."
"We would like an entire DevOps in place in this particular solution."
"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."
"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."
"The price could be improved."
"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."
"The initial setup was difficult because not all the information was included in the implementation model."
"It is very cumbersome and slow for making any changes. It doesn't have that many visuals to show different graphs and charts. It should have more visuals. It also doesn't support HTML5, which is useful for interactive sessions and reporting with dashboard etc. We are phasing it out because we need a newer platform that provides us more flexibility and more designs. Our use case is just to get the utility type of monthly reports, and we need visuals, customizations, columns, and certain sections on the report to show performance and other things. They are not updating their BI Publisher product, which was known as XML Publisher before Oracle bought it. It could be because they don't have that many clients using it. We are using it because we have this solution for years."
"The initial setup was complex and it took a lot of time to set up the infrastructure."
Earn 20 points