We performed a comparison between Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL], Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware."There were no concerns with the stability. This product is very good from a stability perspective."
"The interface has a great look and feel, and the functionality is so easy."
"The OAuth feature is the most valuable feature for authentication."
"The interface is really good."
"The application integration will give you more flexibility when dealing with APIs."
"The tool's visual features are attractive."
"It's easy to develop APIs."
"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."
"The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."
"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs."
"The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."
"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration."
"The solution's deployment and proxy processes are very good."
"I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME)."
"There's no direct way to connect to Amazon APIs from Informatica Cloud."
"There could be a lot more application integration."
"The setup is complex."
"The pricing model is problematic."
"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."
"It has different types of subscriptions. For platinum or lower subscriptions, there are not too many things that can be done. We don't see many features. They should release a basic version that has logging and monitoring features. These features should come with Mule Anypoint Platform for free instead of making customers pay separately for these features. Its dashboard can be improved to have a lot of charts so that it is easy to visualize information. The utilization part can be improved. The dashboard is good currently, but it can be better. Other solutions like Elastic have a good dashboard, and they allow you to administer the product from the UI. Currently, for RTF, there is a different dashboard or utility. It would be good to include the same utility in the cloud solution. It would be good if there is a centralized repository that includes the links to the information about various troubleshooting issues. The documentation is there currently, and it is good, but the troubleshooting information is too scattered. We have to go to different links to find troubleshooting information. This kind of centralized repository would be helpful for new customers who are implementing this solution. It will be helpful to see different kinds of issues that can occur."
"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."
"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."
"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."
"In order to set up a storefront, we currently rely on a third-party solution. It would greatly enhance our operations if this feature was integrated into their existing solution."
"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."
"It should give better control over account management."
Earn 20 points