MySQL vs PostgreSQL vs SQLite comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Logo
Read 142 MySQL reviews
10,906 views|8,720 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
PostgreSQL Logo
13,216 views|10,655 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
SQLite Logo
1,830 views|1,809 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, PostgreSQL, MariaDB and others in Open Source Databases.
To learn more, read our detailed Open Source Databases Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I am totally satisfied with MySQL.""It has a remote access feature to manage the database from a remote location. This enables in-work collaboration.""Fully scalable and stable SQL-based RDBMS, with a straightforward and easy setup.""This product is a good teaching tool for students who want to learn about networked databases.""The tool is open-source and there is no cost involved in its use.""The installation process for the most scalable solution is remarkably quick, taking only a short amount of time.""It is a scalable solution.""The solution is a small application and is very easy to deploy."

More MySQL Pros →

"PostgreSQL makes it very adaptable to several descriptions of a record. Instead of having several tables or several relations for one entity, I can adapt this entity. It can be a multiform entity. For example, here in Mexico, a company and a person can be sold to us as a physical entity or a physical person.""The performance is good.""The main value is that it is open source, which means it is free. Our organization has the initiative to go to open source to cut down on cost. Oracle costs us $6 million a year right now, which is killing us, and Postgres costs nothing. So, there is a big push to go to Postgres.""Scalable, stable, and easy to manage database system, with a straightforward installation.""The solution is open-source and free to use.""It's quite scalable.""It's a useful solution, that can be widely used.""The PostgreSQL database is similar to the SQL Server but has a slightly different technology that has similar resources as well. If the customer has the confidence using SQL Server, they will be fairly comfortable using this solution."

More PostgreSQL Pros →

"The product is lightweight and highly scalable.""Sometimes, you want data to persist within the app even when there's no internet connectivity. To avoid showing blank screens, we can use SQLite to store data locally and then sync it with the cloud database when connectivity is restored.""SQLite’s most valuable feature is the ability to store granular-level backups of databases.""I haven't encountered any problems in my use cases. So, it has been a stable product for me.""I use Flutter Technology with the JSF plugin."

More SQLite Pros →

Cons
"In terms of what I'd like to see in the next release, one thing that's always missing is dash boarding. There's no real BI tool for MySQL, like there is in Yellowfin and all the different tools that you get. They all have MySQL connectors, but there's no specific BI tool for MySQL. These open source projects have sprung up, but they're more general purpose.""At times, the autoscaling does not happen when there is a surge in load.""On the database side, it should be really lightweight, and the data structure should be like MongoDB.""We require more ease of use, scalability, and high availability. These are some of the critical features that we use and look for in a product. It should be easier to manage clusters. Scalability is very important for us because our projects and concurrency requirements are quite big. We also require high availability of the server, application, and other things. It should also have more performance-based features or enhancements from the performance point of view. When we divide a database, it should be able to handle the queries very fast.""There should be an arrangement for end-users to get trained to use the tool...Improvement-wise, a graphical interface could be added for new users, eliminating the need to memorize the complex syntax.""The workbench could be improved. In particular, error messages can be improved, which are horrific and completely unhelpful. I'd like to see improved parsing of errors. When you write SQL and it crashes, it usually is something completely irrelevant and not helpful. I've started to use GPT 3.5 for finding out how to do things. I got to do something a bit different, and that I found to be very useful. If there was some way to tie it into one of the new AI tools, that would probably be a good idea.""The tool needs to improve table visualization.""In the next release, I would like to see the scalability features improved to allow you to configure it and reduce the complexity with the configuration, making it easier for the end-user to scale. Make it as simple as it can be."

More MySQL Cons →

"There are some products out there that have a slightly different method of implementation for the SQL language. Some of those are slightly better in some areas, and PostgreSQL is slightly better in some areas. I would probably like to match all of those products together. It is just down to the functionality. For example, Oracle has a number of options within SQL that are outside of what you would class as the SQL standard. PostgreSQL misses some of those, but PostgreSQL does other things that are better than what Oracle does. I would like to merge those two products so that there is a certain amount of functionality in a single product.""They need to improve the user experience of the management.""It could be more secure.""We have to set up event API, which takes a lot of events from the user.""If it was free to use, it would be the perfect solution.""The interface could be much better.""The pricing could be better.""When you get a large number of records in a database and start doing various queries, it can adversely impact the performance of the live running systems. That's an area we continue to look at and mean to improve, but it is not only because of PostgreSQL. It is also because of the way the schemas are put together, and certain events are triggered. So, it is because of both parties."

More PostgreSQL Cons →

"The performance could be better.""I primarily use SQLite for small-scale applications due to its limitations in storing large amounts of data. For larger-scale projects, I typically opt for MySQL or other alternatives. Storing a large number of dates in SQLite can significantly impact its performance.""It could have a user-friendly GUI and better intelligence features.""There are some difficulties on the server side. When syncing data with databases like SQL Server or Oracle, SQLite requires a kind of double effort.""A potential drawback is that the database file stored within the application's local storage could be accessible to users."

More SQLite Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "When you know the setup will continue to grow, make sure you have the paid support."
  • "​Enterprise editions and support are definitely needed for the heavy users who need direct support. ​"
  • "MySQL Enterprise Support is not cheap, though might still be cheaper than Oracle or SQL Server. They may not have local support depending on where you’re based, but there are many smaller agencies out there that will readily provide support. You’ll need to spend some time looking around."
  • "Can range from free to quite expensive, depending on the environments and requirements, so better to really set goals ahead of setting it up."
  • "I am using the Community Edition, which is available free of charge."
  • "This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."
  • "It's an open-source database management system that can be used free of charge."
  • "Microsoft licensing for SQL Server is probably ten times more expensive. I used to work for the government, and I remember when we were looking into upgrading to the enterprise version of SQL Server 2019, the licensing was going to cost 350,000. To get the equivalent in the cloud, it was going to be about four grand to get the same processing power and everything else. With MySQL, it was going to be about 300 for the same licensing. Cost-wise, for sure, there is a huge difference. Would you prefer to pay 300 a month or 3,000 to have the same amount of data resources? You might lose a few options that you need, but it isn't worth the price difference."
  • More MySQL Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Affordable solution."
  • "It is free. There is no license on it."
  • "It is also open-source so it is free."
  • "PostgreSQL is a free and open-source database."
  • "It is free, but if you need support, you can go for the commercial version called EnterpriseDB. They provide paid support, and they can even do hosting for you if you want standby and support."
  • "It is open-source. If you use it on-premise, it is free. It also has enterprise or commercial versions. If you go for the cloud version, there will be a cost, but it is lower than Oracle or Microsoft."
  • "The solution requires a license."
  • "We do not pay for licensing."
  • More PostgreSQL Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I rate the product’s pricing a six out of ten."
  • "The tool is open-source."
  • "It's a good value."
  • "It's not expensive."
  • More SQLite Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you… more »
    Top Answer:I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions… more »
    Top Answer:One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it… more »
    Top Answer:PostgreSQL was designed in a way that provides you with not only a high degree of flexibility but also offers you a… more »
    Top Answer:We often use PostgreSQL for operations monitoring because we are a manufacturing company.
    Top Answer:I use Flutter Technology with the JSF plugin.
    Top Answer:I primarily use SQLite for small-scale applications due to its limitations in storing large amounts of data. For… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    Views
    10,906
    Comparisons
    8,720
    Reviews
    29
    Average Words per Review
    421
    Rating
    8.6
    2nd
    Views
    13,216
    Comparisons
    10,655
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    381
    Rating
    8.8
    9th
    Views
    1,830
    Comparisons
    1,809
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    305
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Firebird SQL logo
    Compared 26% of the time.
    MariaDB logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Teradata logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    LocalDB logo
    Compared 1% of the time.
    Firebird SQL logo
    Compared 36% of the time.
    MariaDB logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    YugabyteDB logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Chroma logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Firebird SQL logo
    Compared 47% of the time.
    MariaDB logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Oracle Berkeley DB logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    LanceDB logo
    Compared 1% of the time.
    Learn More
    PostgreSQL
    Video Not Available
    SQLite
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    MySQL is an open-source relational database management system (RDBMS) owned by Oracle. Before Oracle acquired the product, it was completely free for users. After the merge, the solution started offering paid services with more features, alongside a free version. MySQL can easily integrate with a wide variety of programming languages, which makes it one of the most flexible and reliable products among its competitors. This cost-effective solution helps users deliver high-performance and scalable database applications through several products. They include:

    • MySQL HeatWave: This is an in-memory query accelerator for MySQL. It is a parallel, columnar, hybrid query-processing engine with algorithms for distributed query processing. This database service is used for transactions, analytics, and machine learning (ML). It offers simplified, secure real-time analytics. It can be deployed on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Amazon AWS, Azure, and users' data centers.

    • My SQL Enterprise Edition: This edition of the solution includes the most comprehensive set of advanced features, technical support, and management tools. The combination functions achieves security, scalability, reliability, and uptime, while reducing risk, cost, and complexity, in managing MySQL applications.

    • MySQL Standard Edition: This edition utilizes industrial-strength performance and reliability to help users deliver high-performance and scalable Open Transaction Processing (OLTP) applications.

    • MySQL Classic Edition: This is an embedded database for independent software vendors (ISVs), original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), and value-added resellers (VARs), that are developing applications using the MyISAM storage engine.

    • MySQL Community Edition: This is the free version of the product, which is supported by a large active community of open-source developers.

    • MySQL Cluster CGE: This is a distributed database that combines linear scalability and high availability. It offers in-memory real-time access across partitioned and distributed databases.

    • MySQL Embedded: This product offers MySQL as an embedded database and is most widely used by ISVs, OEMs, and VARs. It is utilized for making applications, hardware, and appliances more competitive by bringing them to market faster while lowering their cost of goods sold (COGs).

    My SQL Features

    The characteristics of each MySQL edition differ depending on what it offers and what clients it is catered towards. But the main features of the product include the following:

    • Internals and portability: These capabilities allow MySQL to work on multiple platforms and provide transactional and non-transactional storage engines. This set of features is tested with Purify, Vilgrind, and a broad range of different compilers.

    • Data types: Due to the flexibility of the data types feature of MySQL, the product is compatible with a very wide variety of data types, including fixed-length and variable-length string types.

    • Statements and functions: This feature allows MySQL full operator and function support. It supports a wide variety of functions and allows users to refer to tables from different databases in the same statement.

    • Security: The security features of MySQL provide users with a flexible privileged password system that enables host-based verification. The product offers encryption of all password traffic when users connect to a server.

    • Scalability and limits: MySQL supports large databases with up to approximately 50 million records and up to 64 indexes per table.

    • Connectivity: The connectivity features of the product allow clients to connect to MySQL using several protocols, providing them with freedom of choice in terms of which ones to use.

    • Localization: Through this feature, the product offers availability to users in many languages. The server time zone can be changed dynamically and allows clients to specify their own time zone for their convenience.

    • Clients and tools: The product includes several client and utility programs among its capabilities.

    MySQL Benefits

    MySQL brings many benefits to organizations that use it for their data. The most common ones include:

    • Due to its initial open-source nature, MySQL is an easy to understand and beginner-friendly product.

    • The solution still supports an open-source version as well, which means users can download, use, and modify it based on their requirements.

    • MySQL ensures the consistency of data by storing it efficiently and minimizing redundancy.

    • This is considered one of the fastest solutions on the market, a fact which is backed by many benchmark tests.

    • MySQL is very flexible and supports a large number of embedded applications.

    • The solution is compatible with many operating systems.

    • This product offers clients the option to roll back transactions, as well as commit, and crash recovery.

    Reviews from Real Users

    According to a database engineer at a retailer with more than 10,000 employees, MySQL is a great open-source product that offers great scalability and compatibility.

    Yong S., a solutions specialist, system integration, appreciates this product because it has different licensing options and is easy to set up.

    PostgreSQL is a versatile and reliable database management system commonly used for web development, data analysis, and building scalable databases. 

    It offers advanced features like indexing, replication, and transaction management. Users appreciate its flexibility, performance, and ability to handle large amounts of data efficiently. Its robustness, scalability, and support for complex queries make it highly valuable. 

    Additionally, PostgreSQL's extensibility, flexibility, community support, and frequent updates contribute to its ongoing improvement and stability.

    SQLite is an open-source, serverless, reliable, and flexible, SQL database engine. It is particularly favored in the realm of embedded database solutions and small to medium-sized projects. Unlike traditional database systems that operate on a client-server model, SQLite is a serverless database engine, meaning it runs directly within the application it powers. This unique architecture makes SQLite an ideal choice for applications where simplicity, efficiency, and minimal configuration are paramount.

    SQLite is an embedded database engine, which means it operates directly within the application that uses it, without requiring a separate server process. It is designed to be cross-platform, supporting multiple operating systems, and is is compatible with a wide range of programming languages, such as C, C++, Python, Java, and more. This makes it highly portable and suitable for a wide range of applications, from mobile devices to desktop software and web applications.

    The key advantages of SQLite is its reliability, the lightweight nature and efficient performance. It has a small footprint, typically requiring only a few megabytes of disk space, and can operate entirely in memory if needed. It is designed to be reliable and robust, with built-in features such as atomic commit and rollback, which ensure data integrity even in the event of system crashes or power failures. Finally, the SQLite solution requires no configuration or setup, making it easy to use and deploy. It can be embedded directly into applications without the need for complex installation or configuration procedures.

      SQLite Functionality

      • SQL Compliance: SQLite supports a substantial portion of the SQL standard, including features like transactions, triggers, views, and indexes.
      • File-based Storage: SQLite stores its entire database as a single cross-platform file on the host machine's file system.
      • ACID Compliance: SQLite fully supports ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) transactions, ensuring data consistency and integrity in concurrent access scenarios.

      SQLite is an open-source project distributed under a public domain license, which means it can be used, modified, and distributed freely, without any licensing costs or restrictions.

      To summarize, SQLite is widely used in various applications, including web browsers (e.g., Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome), mobile applications (e.g., Android, iOS), embedded systems, and desktop software. Its simplicity, portability, and efficiency make it a popular choice for developers who require a lightweight and reliable database solution, especially in resource-constrained environments or applications with modest data storage needs.

      Sample Customers
      Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.
      1. Apple 2. Cisco 3. Fujitsu 4. Instagram 5. Netflix 6. Red Hat 7. Sony 8. Uber 9. Cisco Systems 10. Skype 11. LinkedIn 12. Etsy 13. Yelp 14. Reddit 15. Dropbox 16. Slack 17. Twitch 18. WhatsApp 19. Snapchat 20. Shazam 21. SoundCloud 22. The New York Times 23. Cisco WebEx 24. Atlassian 25. Cisco Meraki 26. Heroku 27. GitLab 28. Zalando 29. OpenTable 30. Trello 31. Square Enix 32. Bloomberg
      Oracle, Bloomberg, Bentley, Mozilla
      Top Industries
      REVIEWERS
      Computer Software Company22%
      Financial Services Firm11%
      University10%
      Comms Service Provider9%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company16%
      Comms Service Provider10%
      Financial Services Firm10%
      Manufacturing Company6%
      REVIEWERS
      Computer Software Company14%
      Comms Service Provider13%
      Financial Services Firm9%
      University8%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company15%
      Comms Service Provider12%
      Financial Services Firm10%
      Manufacturing Company7%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company20%
      Comms Service Provider17%
      Manufacturing Company8%
      University7%
      Company Size
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business45%
      Midsize Enterprise19%
      Large Enterprise37%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business26%
      Midsize Enterprise15%
      Large Enterprise59%
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business45%
      Midsize Enterprise20%
      Large Enterprise35%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business27%
      Midsize Enterprise14%
      Large Enterprise60%
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business56%
      Midsize Enterprise11%
      Large Enterprise33%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business28%
      Midsize Enterprise16%
      Large Enterprise55%
      Buyer's Guide
      Open Source Databases
      March 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, PostgreSQL, MariaDB and others in Open Source Databases. Updated: March 2024.
      768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.