We performed a comparison between IBM Rational Functional Tester, OpenText UFT One, and ReadyAPI Test based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."
"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."
"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."
"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."
"The most valuable feature is that it is fast during test execution, unlike LoadRunner."
"The ease of record and playback as well as descriptive programming are the most valuable features of UFT (QTP)."
"The initial setup is relatively easy."
"The high-level security, high standard and compatible SAP are great."
"It is very simple to use, and the scripting language is even easier."
"Hidden among the kitchen sink of features is a new Data Generation tool called the Test Combinations Generator."
"With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources."
"It's easy to use for beginners and non-technical people."
"The utmost importance lies in the performance of the application."
"The solution offers excellent integration capabilities."
"The solution scales well."
"The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on."
"Using SoapUI's automation suites to run all our test cases saved us a lot of time. Running 300 test cases takes about three to four days. When you automate all that, it takes only two to three hours."
"SoapUI Pro is a good tool when it comes to API design and orchestration. Additionally, it is beneficial for functional and for performance testing."
"The most valuable features are that it is user-friendly, it's easy to use and easy to teach to others."
"We used to write our own solutions, from small scripts to task web services, so this saves us thousands of hours."
"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."
"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."
"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."
"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."
"I'd like to see test case-related reports included in the solution."
"Perhaps more coverage as far as different languages go. I'm talking more about object identification."
"I would like to have detailed description provided to test the cloud-based applications."
"[Tech support is] not a 10 because what happens with some of our issues is that we might not get a patch quickly and we have to hold on to an application until we get a proper solution."
"The UA objects are sometimes hard to recognize, so the coverage should be increased. Open-source alternatives have a broad scope. Also, it's sometimes difficult to make connections between two of the components in the UFT mobile center. It should be easier to set up the wireless solution because we have to set both. We directly integrate Selenium and APM, so we should try to cover all the features they have in APM and Selenium with the UFT mobile."
"Sometimes, the results' file size can be intense. I wish it was a little more compact."
"I would want to see a significant improvement in the tool's features. The most significant enhancements are support for panel execution and integration with DevSecOps."
"It should consume less CPU, and the licensing cost could be lower."
"I find that I'm fighting with the opportunities to order requests."
"The current interface is unsatisfactory."
"SoapUI Pro could improve by having dashboards."
"We tried automation but it's not easy to integrate with the synching and some of the mission tools that we use for automated testing of APIs."
"SoapUI Pro is a little heavy due to the number of features. Previously it was not that heavy. Now the tool is too heavy, they should work on fixing this issue because until your system has lots of resources, you won't be able to use it seamlessly. The performance of the application itself could improve."
"If the load and bare minimum could be defined, I would give this solution a higher rating."
"I would like more documentation, training, tutorials, etc. Also, I don't particularly appreciate that I have to save everything. It takes up a lot of space on my laptop, but I have to install the WSDL again If I don't save it."
"Could integrate the graphing module for load testing."
More IBM Rational Functional Tester Pricing and Cost Advice →
