We performed a comparison between Galen Framework, IBM Rational Functional Tester, and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."What I like most about Galen Framework are its advantages, particularly its spec language and the spec file feature."
"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."
"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."
"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."
"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."
"The initial setup isn't too difficult."
"It has helped teams within our organization become more aware of the testing requirements in terms of risk and priority."
"Multiple scanning engines to automate many different applications."
"The tool's most valuable feature is Tosca Commander."
"The Model-Based Test Automation is the most valuable feature, where you can create reusable components. Even though we are using a scriptless automation tool, there still needs to be an understanding of how to create reusable components and how to keep refactoring and how to keep regression, the test scripts, at an okay level. We are coupling Tosca with some other risk-based testing tools, as well, but automation is primarily what we're using Tosca for, the scriptless, model-based technology which is driving automation for us."
"With one click, it will scan all the elements on the screen, so that the user can select the required elements for automation tests."
"The most valuable feature of Tricentis Tosca is the Tosca Commander. Functionality is another thing I find most valuable in the solution."
"Very user-friendly and the low code automation is really helpful."
"There don't seem to be functions available for automatically generating Galen values based on the specifications in the spec file, and this could be a potential improvement for Galen Framework."
"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."
"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."
"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."
"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."
"Tricentis Tosca's performance could be better. Sometimes when we are remapping or when it is loading it can take a lot of time. There are free solutions that have better performance in this area."
"Tricentis Tosca currently does not support any mobile testing and can be improved."
"The UI does not have the option of automating the scroll bars."
"Making it more stable would be good because we get around 90% stability."
"The reporting function was lacking in usability and detail."
"I would like to see better integration with other testing tools."
"I think the downside would be licensing costs which are very high."
"Tricentis Tosca’s technical support could be improved."
More IBM Rational Functional Tester Pricing and Cost Advice →