Amazon RDS vs Google Cloud SQL vs Oracle Database as a Service comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
9,454 views|7,642 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Google Logo
5,843 views|5,283 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
2,870 views|2,360 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon RDS, Google Cloud SQL, and Oracle Database as a Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, MongoDB and others in Database as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed Database as a Service Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product's installation phase is easy.""The product is very, very easy to use.""It is stable, scalable, and easy to deploy.""I found it to be a stable solution.""The Amazon RDS features I found most valuable are snapshots and automatic backups.""Amazon RDS handles database backup mechanisms and patch management.""Amazon RDS is very easy to use.""Relational databases excel in extensive normalization, eliminating data redundancy and efficiently structuring tables which leads to a clear and efficient relationship between tables using primary keys."

More Amazon RDS Pros →

"The valuable feature of Google Cloud SQL is its high availability option. The product is stable.""I found its storage and security to be the most valuable. It was a good experience. It is also very stable and scalable, and its support is perfect.""The setup was straightforward. Just a couple of clicks, and we were done.""Ease of management and the ability to oversee the statistics of your SQL.""The most valuable features are that it's easy to use, simple, and user-friendly.""It supports different databases, like Postgres and MySQL.""It's SQL. SQL is so easy if you know something about databases. It's easy to learn.""It is not the cool features that I find valuable, it is the stability of Google Cloud Platform."

More Google Cloud SQL Pros →

"The most valuable feature of Oracle Database as a Service is the object types. The object types are not available in other databases, such as SQL and Postgres. Additionally, the security is very good.""Oracle DBaaS performs well. It's similar to the MS Store.""The initial setup is not too difficult, and on a scale from one to ten with one being the most difficult and ten being the easiest, I'd rate it at eight. The initial deployment can be done in an hour.""Not only does it provide a mature, reliable solution for DR. It also helps if application owners need to look into data which is a couple of hours old, using Flashback Database on the standby database.""I would rate this solution as an eight out of ten because the stability and performance are good and the solution does not need to be maintained a lot.""It is very easy to use.""The most valuable features of Oracle Database as a Service are the power, security, and performance.""The most valuable feature of Oracle Database as a Service is the stopwatch."

More Oracle Database as a Service Pros →

Cons
"Sometimes the interface has many moving parts, which is a concern.""Some of the features will not be there. For example, some on-premises things we want to set up will not be supported there. There are some challenges that they are fixing.""One notable improvement that could enhance the database management experience, particularly during migration scenarios, is the accessibility of the root user.""The product must add more older versions of the database engines.""There are some advanced monitoring queries that we cannot execute because Amazon doesn't give admin privileges to the end users.""I feel Amazon RDS should have a lot of functionalities to make monitoring within the database easier.""Currently, we are using Fargate. Instead of that, we are planning to use EC2 instances, but we are facing some problems, and we are unable to enable NAT gateway for Elastic Load Balancer. When we enable auto-scaling, the instance count increases, and we get IP addresses dynamically. We need to whitelist the IPs of these instances, but there is no option to whitelist those IPs in Amazon RDS. We need one static IP that we can assign to ELB so that we can whitelist this IP.""Currently, speaking of Microsoft SQL on RDS, you don't have a full option to be able to use it directly on RDS. So, it needs improvement."

More Amazon RDS Cons →

"To create a seamless data integration, the title integration of these databases with the data integration platforms is essential. This is what we would like to have in a future release.""For data analysis, the AI area of the product has certain shortcomings where improvements are required.""Google's technical support is good, but they tend to never reopen a case and to send us snippets from the publicly available documentation. It's not as helpful as you would expect, not just for Google Cloud SQL but for all of Google Cloud products.""The only thing that could be better is the pricing.""Google Cloud SQL still needs better connectivity to outside, existing data sources.""The purging of the data could be better.""The customer support should be improved.""The monitoring part could be better."

More Google Cloud SQL Cons →

"I have had a hard time finding some documentation. There should provide easier accessible documentation for Oracle Database as a Service.""On the cloud services, they need to improve some console-level items, including the logging of the databases on the console level.""Improvement in Oracle DBaaS could focus on enhancing performance monitoring and reporting tools.""Oracle Database as a Service could improve the performance when monitoring.""In the next release, I would like to see a framework for memory management.""The solution’s price could be reduced.""The product is very expensive.""Oracle Database as a Service could improve by reducing the price."

More Oracle Database as a Service Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "By using a combination of Reserve Instances and On-Demand pricing, you can reduce the cost."
  • "The cost of using this solution is similar to that of having your own data center."
  • "The price could be better."
  • "It is less expensive than SQL Server. We pay based on the usage on a monthly basis."
  • "We are paying for a service license."
  • "Licensing fees are paid on an annual basis."
  • "if you don't know how to optimize and use your tool properly, the cost might hurt you."
  • "Amazon RDS could improve by reducing the price."
  • More Amazon RDS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is very much an important factor as to why we use this solution."
  • "It's really cheap. It wouldn't be more than, I believe it's around 50 euro per month for running a cloud SQL."
  • "From a financial perspective, Google Cloud SQL is on the cheaper side."
  • "You need to pay extra costs for backup and replication."
  • "The solution is affordable."
  • "It is not expensive, especially considering the significant reduction in database management time."
  • More Google Cloud SQL Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The licensing is a nightmare. Tons of options which need to be licensed individually, and no real offering for VMware or other Hypervisors."
  • "There should be a standard way to license the database in a virtual environment (e.g. VMware) and there should be a low-end version (like Standard Edition One) again."
  • "The price depends on the solution you choose: standard, enterprise, or high performance. For example, enterprise can start between 0.4 an hour up to 1,800. Additional fees also depends on what package you choose. Your feels will be different if you choose the standard, enterprise, high performance, or extreme package. You will pay in relation to what option you ask for. The price is very good if you compare it to other databases."
  • "The pricing may seem expensive, but the value corresponds to the quality of the product."
  • "The pricing is a little bit expensive."
  • "The price of Oracle Database as a Service could be better."
  • "I do not know firsthand about the price of Oracle Database as a Service, but it is known that Oracle solutions tend to be priced higher than competitors."
  • "For on-premises, a perpetual license is a standard $17,500 plus 22% for one year of support."
  • More Oracle Database as a Service Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's installation phase is easy.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive. If Cisco needs two servers, Amazon uses four.
    Top Answer:The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required.
    Top Answer:The implementation part of the product was easy.
    Top Answer:It is not expensive, especially considering the significant reduction in database management time.
    Top Answer:The most challenging part is dealing with legacy data from your old systems and migrating it into the new setup, but… more »
    Top Answer:It has significantly enhanced our application development process by introducing substantial time savings and… more »
    Top Answer:It is an expensive product. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten.
    Top Answer:Improvement in Oracle DBaaS could focus on enhancing performance monitoring and reporting tools. A more streamlined… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    Views
    9,454
    Comparisons
    7,642
    Reviews
    33
    Average Words per Review
    373
    Rating
    8.5
    4th
    Views
    5,843
    Comparisons
    5,283
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    422
    Rating
    8.0
    5th
    Views
    2,870
    Comparisons
    2,360
    Reviews
    45
    Average Words per Review
    330
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    RDS
    Oracle DBaaS, Oracle Database Cloud
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.

    Google Cloud SQL is a fully-managed database service that makes it easy to set up, maintain, manage, and administer your relational PostgreSQL and MySQL databases in the cloud. Google Cloud SQL offers high performance, scalability, and convenience. Hosted on Google Cloud Platform, Cloud SQL provides a database infrastructure for applications running anywhere.

    Oracle Database Cloud Service combines the power of Oracle Database, with the unique capabilities of the Oracle Cloud. The service provides a secure, automated data management platform that leverages on demand Oracle Cloud Infrastructure services via a simple web based user interface and RESTful API. Oracle Database Cloud Service provides elastic database services for development, test, and production environments of custom and packaged online transaction processing (OLTP), data warehousing, and mixed workload applications. It enables businesses to reap all Oracle Platform as a Service (PaaS) benefits including subscriptionbased, self-service access to reliable, scalable, and elastic cloud environments and accelerates time to value by simplifying the provisioning and administration of Oracle databases.

    Sample Customers
    Edmodo
    BeDataDriven, CodeFutures, Daffodil, GenieConnect, KiSSFLOW, LiveHive, SulAm_rica, Zync
    Solution-Soft, DX Marketing, Suredell and Partners, Frontiers, SettleOurEstate.com, Demand Analysis Ltd, endlich IT & Projekt Service OHG
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Government14%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Retailer9%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise66%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise45%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Database as a Service
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, MongoDB and others in Database as a Service. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.