Amazon RDS vs Google Cloud SQL vs Google Cloud Spanner comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
9,454 views|7,642 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Google Logo
1,590 views|1,253 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Google Logo
5,843 views|5,283 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon RDS, Google Cloud Spanner, and Google Cloud SQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, MongoDB and others in Database as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed Database as a Service Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution's customer service is excellent.""The dashboard and performance are the most valuable features of Amazon RDS.""Amazon RDS is very easy to use.""Relational databases excel in extensive normalization, eliminating data redundancy and efficiently structuring tables which leads to a clear and efficient relationship between tables using primary keys.""The time to install or set up a database environment is very fast.""Being able to change the size of an RDS MySQL instance is amazing.""Amazon RDS gives us the ability to select as many tools, replicas, regions, and zones as we want.""It is easy to use, flexible, and powerful."

More Amazon RDS Pros →

"Google Cloud Spanner is stable.""We can scale the solution if we need to.""The most valuable feature of the solution is its scalability. Scalability comes with two options, among which Google Cloud Spanner can scale horizontally, compared to other relational databases that scale vertically.""The application deployment in the cloud is the best feature of the infrastructure."

More Google Cloud Spanner Pros →

"The solution is easy to use. I am impressed with the tool's features and functionality.""I found its storage and security to be the most valuable. It was a good experience. It is also very stable and scalable, and its support is perfect.""The valuable feature of Google Cloud SQL is its high availability option. The product is stable.""The initial setup is straightforward.""Ease of management and the ability to oversee the statistics of your SQL.""It supports different databases, like Postgres and MySQL.""Its most valuable feature is that it's scalable. I can start off with a base of a lot of data and move as much as I want and it's the same as if asked to do a lot of infrastructure changes.""It's SQL. SQL is so easy if you know something about databases. It's easy to learn."

More Google Cloud SQL Pros →

Cons
"Amazon has a policy of automatically restarting the server every seven days.""The product must add more older versions of the database engines.""When you are using it for the first time, it is a little bit hard to configure. The first-time configuration is not very easy. It should be easier to configure. Its installation should also be simpler. Currently, its installation is very complex. With SQL Server, we have access to the SQL Server analysis services and reporting services, but such services are not available with Amazon RDS.""There are some advanced monitoring queries that we cannot execute because Amazon doesn't give admin privileges to the end users.""I would like to see improvements in the tool's automatic restart.""Sometimes the interface has many moving parts, which is a concern.""They should add a feature for manual SQL patching in RDS.""Currently, speaking of Microsoft SQL on RDS, you don't have a full option to be able to use it directly on RDS. So, it needs improvement."

More Amazon RDS Cons →

"The tool needs to improve horizontal scaling.""The cost can be a bit high.""Google came up with something called Cloud Spanner Emulator, which fails to work like the real product if I want to develop some code and run a database locally on my machine.""I want to improve the deployment of cameras and surveillance infrastructure."

More Google Cloud Spanner Cons →

"Google's technical support is good, but they tend to never reopen a case and to send us snippets from the publicly available documentation. It's not as helpful as you would expect, not just for Google Cloud SQL but for all of Google Cloud products.""Google Cloud SQL still needs better connectivity to outside, existing data sources.""The most vulnerable problem with Google SQL is that while you can customize your access control list, it provides you with a public IP address.""In the case of Google, they need to work on a more easy interface for users.""The monitoring part could be better.""For data analysis, the AI area of the product has certain shortcomings where improvements are required.""I am yet to explore a lot of features that are present in this solution. However, it would be good if more documentation is available for this solution. This would help us in preparing for the certification exam and understand it better. Currently, we don't have much documentation. We do the labs for 20 or 25 minutes, but we can't capture and download anything.""I would like to see better availability of the product in different regions. It should also improve the security with encryption."

More Google Cloud SQL Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "By using a combination of Reserve Instances and On-Demand pricing, you can reduce the cost."
  • "The cost of using this solution is similar to that of having your own data center."
  • "The price could be better."
  • "It is less expensive than SQL Server. We pay based on the usage on a monthly basis."
  • "We are paying for a service license."
  • "Licensing fees are paid on an annual basis."
  • "if you don't know how to optimize and use your tool properly, the cost might hurt you."
  • "Amazon RDS could improve by reducing the price."
  • More Amazon RDS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is expensive."
  • "Google Cloud Spanner is an expensive solution."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • More Google Cloud Spanner Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is very much an important factor as to why we use this solution."
  • "It's really cheap. It wouldn't be more than, I believe it's around 50 euro per month for running a cloud SQL."
  • "From a financial perspective, Google Cloud SQL is on the cheaper side."
  • "You need to pay extra costs for backup and replication."
  • "The solution is affordable."
  • "It is not expensive, especially considering the significant reduction in database management time."
  • More Google Cloud SQL Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's installation phase is easy.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive. If Cisco needs two servers, Amazon uses four.
    Top Answer:The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required.
    Top Answer:Google Cloud Spanner has all the features of a traditional relational database, including schemas, SQL queries, ACID… more »
    Top Answer:The implementation part of the product was easy.
    Top Answer:It is not expensive, especially considering the significant reduction in database management time.
    Top Answer:The most challenging part is dealing with legacy data from your old systems and migrating it into the new setup, but… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    Views
    9,454
    Comparisons
    7,642
    Reviews
    33
    Average Words per Review
    373
    Rating
    8.5
    8th
    Views
    1,590
    Comparisons
    1,253
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    384
    Rating
    9.0
    4th
    Views
    5,843
    Comparisons
    5,283
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    422
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    RDS
    Google Spanner
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.

    Cloud Spanner is the first and only relational database service that is both strongly consistent and horizontally scalable. With Cloud Spanner you enjoy all the traditional benefits of a relational database: ACID transactions, relational schemas (and schema changes without downtime), SQL queries, high performance, and high availability. But unlike any other relational database service, Cloud Spanner scales horizontally, to hundreds or thousands of servers, so it can handle the highest of transactional workloads. With automatic scaling, synchronous data replication, and node redundancy, Cloud Spanner delivers up to 99.999% (five 9s) of availability for your mission critical applications. In fact, Google’s internal Spanner service has been handling millions of queries per second from many Google services for years.

    Google Cloud SQL is a fully-managed database service that makes it easy to set up, maintain, manage, and administer your relational PostgreSQL and MySQL databases in the cloud. Google Cloud SQL offers high performance, scalability, and convenience. Hosted on Google Cloud Platform, Cloud SQL provides a database infrastructure for applications running anywhere.
    Sample Customers
    Edmodo
    Streak, Optiva, Mixpanel
    BeDataDriven, CodeFutures, Daffodil, GenieConnect, KiSSFLOW, LiveHive, SulAm_rica, Zync
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Government14%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Retailer12%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Retailer9%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Database as a Service
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, MongoDB and others in Database as a Service. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.