We performed a comparison between Dell AppSync, Dell RecoverPoint, and NetApp SnapMirror based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, IBM, Dell Technologies and others in Copy Data Management."This solution is very helpful and easy to use."
"I believe one of the advantages we saw was that the configuration was manageable."
"When it works, it is the best product that is available."
"The tool's most valuable feature is stability."
"The most valuable feature we have found in RecoverPoint is its ability to provide the lowest RPO."
"The solution is now Flash-based, which is better. they moved away from Java."
"It is amazing because it is very easy to test with many alternative bookmarks."
"RecoverPoint's most valuable feature is the automatic failover."
"It can replicate data from a distant location and it can scan it as well. It has continuous data replication with almost no data loss."
"The solution provides continuous data protection."
"The most valuable feature is the data replication tool. There is also a lot of ability for data migration."
"This solution is easy to implement and easy to use."
"Overall, the product is very good. It's an easy to use tool."
"NetApp is one of the best products in this field of storage solutions."
"NetApp SnapMirror's ease of use and reliability are valuable features."
"With SnapMirror, the solution is the feature itself that is most valuable. It just replicates the data. It's very difficult to speak about, in the sense that it's similar to the features of a wheel. It is round and it's a part of an automobile."
"There are a lot of features that are excellent. The data compression during the transfer, for example, is good. The replication is great. The durability of the solution and the speed of the data moving from one site to another is impressive."
"The tool seamlessly moves data over the network without putting pressure on the network."
"I would like to have the ability to bit the same system with multiple AppSync replications would definitely be beneficial to us. And general flexibility enhancements."
"It would be helpful if this product has features for transferring to the cloud."
"It is worth mentioning that this solution is no longer supported, primarily because it doesn't replicate between two different storage systems anymore."
"Considering the speed Dell RecoverPoint can recover data, it would be good if we could replicate data from on-premise to the cloud with this solution."
"Other hypervisors should be integrated with this system. Other hypervisors should be able to get the benefits of this solution."
"The cost of the solution is pretty high. The licensing costs may affect a company's ability to scale."
"The support is horrible."
"RecoverPoint's WAN optimization could be improved."
"Integration with VMware is the only thing we need to improve. Another feature I'd like to see is the ability to convert management to HTML. And the integration should also be done on the same level."
"I am waiting for block replication with VirtualBox."
"The new coursework models need to be improved. The bandwidth monitoring could also be better."
"The price needs to be improved."
"It is not as efficient as it needs to be. It doesn't compress the data really well when it is forwarded to a secondary site. The download performance could be better."
"We must be able to integrate Flash Pool with SnapMirror."
"We have different families of storage, such as the E-Series and Flash systems, but NetApp cannot be set up between them."
"The solution's dashboard and reporting could be improved."
"There is probably some limitations when it comes to the scalability of the solution."
"In the next release, I would like to see Data reduction included and WAN optimization."
