We performed a comparison between Laserfiche Rio, Oracle Content Management, and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."This is a very complete and powerful solution."
"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"SharePoint enabled the staff to share documents and work on a document simultaneously."
"I do like the collaboration around documents. The versioning history has proven useful in some instances as well."
"It is very stable."
"Information is much more readily available."
"It offers an easy way to store unstructured content (.pdf, .doc, .xls, images) and to tag them with metadata."
"The search feature is valuable."
"The most valuable features of SharePoint Online are content management, document management, and approval processes. Additionally, there are a number of features that provide integration with multiple Office services and external services."
"It has made us faster and more efficient."
"We would like to see more features for RPA and AI."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
"The product could be improved in a lot of way. It is so frustrating to get things to work as advertised."
"It will fully use your system resources."
"I would like a simpler, more cost-effective solution for connecting data sources with workflows and BI tools, or data mining tools."
"It should have more user-friendly customization, as it still requires developers to get engaged and build sites."
"More hints and make it more user-customizable."
"The initial setup process is not intuitive."
"Using SharePoint is difficult."
"It has worked very well for me. It seems like they've improved everything. I don't have any cons about it as such, but I don't think they have a talk-to-text, speech-to-text, or speech-to-type. That would be cool for accessibility."
Earn 20 points