We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, SAP ERP, and SYSPRO based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP."I have found the solutions best features to be financial procurement, inventory, and manufacturing."
"We find the ease of use, customization, and user interface valuable."
"The product can scale."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perfect for our reporting for the management, workflow, and procurement workflow."
"I think it is strong in sales, inventory, and pricing."
"The product has been stable so far."
"Flexibility is the most valuable aspect of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne because it allows customization."
"The solution can scale."
"The most valuable features of SAP ERP are that its robust, user-friendly, and secure."
"It gives us full control over each change, to the level of the individual field in a master record, including certificates."
"The solution has far more features, processes, and functionalities than we previously had."
"SAP is a very process controlled application. It does not allow users to manage the data. Once the initial process is set, it works smoothly."
"The transactional integration of operations is the best-recommended feature of this product. It provides integration of all operational modules."
"It has a lot of integrity of data, and it is fast. All the users feel that they can trust this data. So, data integrity is the most important value of SAP."
"SAP ERP is one of the most well-integrated solutions with all of the applications in my company, making it one of the most advantageous traits of the product."
"It automates transactional processes."
"The Financial Accounting module, in general, is quite good. It is quite simple but powerful. Similarly, the Manufacturing functionality, including a multiple level bill of materials, is also quite useful."
"From the operation perspective, it could offer more functionality for the APIs."
"If they can research and make the installation part easier or more user-friendly, it would be nice."
"They have the interface with Hubble and other reporting, however, we just want that to be a part of JD Edwards."
"They have been improving it every day, but it could have more automation."
"They need to improve the logs and need to write some sort of script that clears logs after so many days."
"The only issue with the solution that it yet to consider improvements in its price."
"It does not submit the inquiry as requested. We have to close the application and restart the computer."
"I would like the user experience to be more user-friendly."
"It could always be cheaper. There is no doubt about it."
"It could be more flexible, and the company should be able to adapt the system. Not the other way around. It's very rigid and difficult to change. Reporting could also be better."
"Reporting is why most companies need to acquire business intelligence add-on solutions, and when it comes to SAP ERP, they could improve the reporting graphical representation of the data."
"The user interface could be improved. For example, sometimes you're missing some data and can't complete a task. There should be some built-in support and suggestions on how to solve your problem. I would also like the interface to be optimized to work better with mobile devices like tablets and smartphones."
"We will not make any major changes, and we are not expecting any enhancements or new features from SAP because they already have a new solution. No development is happening on SAP ERP because SAP has come up with a new version called SAP S/4HANA, which is memory-based technology. We are planning to upgrade to SAP S/4HANA, but we don't know when it will happen. We are in the preparation phase."
"Lacks sufficient technical support with slow response times."
"I would like to see more integration with other partners. Some of our customers already use specific or in-house applications for their business processes. They do not want to replace those applications."
"I believe there's room for improvement in terms of user experience."
"SYSPRO at the moment is lacking on the project side. There's a module called Projects and Contracts, and it's a poorly designed module. One of my clients is a project-based organization, and they're finding it extremely difficult to manage their business using SYSPRO, to the point that they're looking at alternative solutions. The Projects and Contracts module is not a very useful tool. It does project accounting reasonably well, but in terms of putting in proper structures, like a work breakdown structure and so forth, it's actually quite poor. Their design or their architecture for the Projects module isn't good enough. They need to redesign it and redevelop it. They have made improvements. However, the problem is that if you're building on a bad foundation, then your building isn't going to be very strong. That's principally their problem. Any heavy equipment company would have a requirement to keep their equipment available for production. In that sense, SYSPRO has no maintenance management functionality. There's also no functionality for field services management. These two functionalities are critical for places like mines or for heavy equipment manufacturers who service the aftermarket and so forth. From a product perspective, this obviously isn't a good place to be because they are sort of taking themselves out of the market for quite a number of industries. They are constrained to manufacturing and distribution."
Earn 20 points
