• Home
  • Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs. OpenText UFT One

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs OpenText UFT One vs SmarteSoft Testing Suite comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Read 6 Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] reviews
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo

OpenText UFT One

Read 89 OpenText UFT One reviews
11,332 views|6,976 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
SmarteSoft Logo

SmarteSoft Testing Suite

103 views|84 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Service Test [EOL], OpenText UFT One, and SmarteSoft Testing Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night.
We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night.
Kishore Kandula
UFT One supports AI features to automate web and mobile applications
In some of our recent customer requirements, we have proposed the OpenText UFT One tool. The primary reason behind this is that a customer may have... Read more →
Use SmarteSoft Testing Suite?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly."
  • "The licensing and pricing model is confusing."
  • "It's an expensive solution."
  • "For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand."
  • "The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue."
  • "The way the pricing model works is that you pay a whole boatload year one. Then, every year after, it is around half or less. Because instead of paying for the new product, you are just paying for the support and maintenance of it. That is probably one of the biggest things that I hear from most people, even at conferences, "Yeah, I would love to use UFT One, but we don't have a budget for it.""
  • "The pricing fee is good. If someone makes use of the solution once a day for a half hour then the fee will be more expensive. For continuous use and application of the solution to different use cases, the fee is average."
  • "The price is one aspect that could be improved."

    • More OpenText UFT One Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
    Top Answer:We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing MicroFocus… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?
    Top Answer:My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.
    Read all 35 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?
    Top Answer:The product wasn't easy for developers to learn and pick up in the area revolving around scripting for automation, and… more »
    Read all 34 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Functional Testing Tools
    2nd
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    11,332
    Comparisons
    6,976
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    694
    Rating
    7.9
    42nd
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    103
    Comparisons
    84
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Service Test, HPE Service Test
    Micro Focus UFT One, UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
    Learn More
    OpenText
    OpenText
    SmarteSoft
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

    Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications. Read white paper
    SmarteSoft Testing Suite brings a highly extensible integrated quality assurance platform to complement team's quality and productivity efforts, driving improvements in project efficiency, end-user experience and business outcomes. SmarteSoft's patented script-less testing technologies reduce time for test case scripting, testing cycles and let you increase both QA/ALM and production efficiencies. Testing Suites include the following: Functional Testing, Performance Testing, Validation Testing, Regression Testing, ALM & Healthcare.
    Sample Customers
    John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
    Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services
    Humanitarian Aid Organization, Columbian Financial Group (CFG), Proxibid, Fremont Investment & Loan, Indiana Pension Systems, Posera
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Insurance Company10%
    Healthcare Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise75%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.