Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager [EOL] vs NetApp OnCommand Insight vs SolarWinds Storage Resource Monitor comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager [EOL], NetApp OnCommand Insight, and SolarWinds Storage Resource Monitor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Dell Technologies, NetApp and others in Storage Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Storage Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The stability of the Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager is good."

More Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager [EOL] Pros →

"The machine learning features help me troubleshoot faster.""It gives visibility to the VMs.""The Performance Manager: Where we get performance statistics.""Being able to immediately look at my data. See the sizing, where I'm at on different virtual machines.""OnCommand Insight's most valuable feature is the ability to see figure applications.""The most valuable feature is the security. When we identify a vulnerability, it is easy to mitigate it. NetApp provides the solution. It's also easy to create and move volumes.""We haven't gone to the extent where we are using the anomaly detection, but from a reporting perspective and single-pane-of-glass perspective, to look at our heterogeneous infrastructure, it is doing a great job.""The most valuable feature is definitely the reports, the complete analysis of the data. We also like the scalability, since it can work with Hitachi, Isilon, etc."

More NetApp OnCommand Insight Pros →

"The initial setup is very straightforward."

More SolarWinds Storage Resource Monitor Pros →

Cons
"Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager could improve by having more parameters for storage. When you take the solution out of the box there need to be some more features built-in."

More Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager [EOL] Cons →

"I'd like it to be more stable, simpler, and get Java out of it.""Enhance SNMP monitoring in order to broaden the number of storages that can be discovered.""From 7-Mode to C mode a migration happened and many features, like FTP and SFTP, were dropped. We have been using it, but there needs to be better communication when features are dropped because there are end users using it who might find it a shock: "Oh, why was that dropped?"""NetApp OnCommand Insight is a pretty good tool, and the only concern I have with it is the price. Its price is quite high and could be improved because the licensing feature of this particular tool is on a per GB basis instead of the price being for the complete tool itself. The more you discover, the more you need to pay, and this makes NetApp OnCommand Insight more costly when compared to other tools which are available in the market.""Just make it one product, not in pieces like performance and discovery. Stop having all these individual pieces.""I would like to see better graphics. We have seen regular graphs and pie graphs. I am sure that there are better ways to show this information.""You can build those out, but initially when you bring up the dashboard, that was one thing they couldn't take away. They couldn't change that. It just looks kind of kludgy. I'd like it to look a lot more clean when I first login.""When we first went to Cluster Mode, we had a lot of problems. Setup took a few months. We had people onsite, including one of the top guys from NetApp for a while. Going from 7-Mode to Cluster Mode was rough."

More NetApp OnCommand Insight Cons →

"The solution could always be more easily scalable."

More SolarWinds Storage Resource Monitor Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Pricing by terabytes, not the end of the world, and that's okay. Stop if I want this, I have to buy that. Just release it as a single product."
  • "The cost: It is expensive as a solution. You need to be an expert to get anything out of it and we don't have that kind of expertise."
  • "For me, it is always too much. Licensing is on TBs, and I think, nowadays that is outmoded."
  • "The company has saved money by narrowing down issues faster using servers and performance."
  • "We like that it is one license and everything is bundled in together."
  • "We just made a major investment back in May of this year, so we'll have it for another four and a half or five years easily. Thus, we have a five year bumper to bumper agreement."
  • "Pricing for NetApp OnCommand Insight could be cheaper. On a scale of one to five, I would rate its price a four."
  • More NetApp OnCommand Insight Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Storage Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:OnCommand Insight's most valuable feature is the ability to see figure applications.
    Top Answer:Pricing for NetApp OnCommand Insight could be cheaper. On a scale of one to five, I would rate its price a four.
    Top Answer:OnCommand Insight is really limited compared to what Cloud Insights is doing. It lacks AI to protect against ransomware… more »
    Top Answer:The initial setup is very straightforward.
    Top Answer:I don't have any details related to cost or licensing.
    Top Answer:Some of my clients complain that their arrays are working fine, yet, in SolarWinds, they show me as unreachable as the… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Storage Management
    6th
    out of 27 in Storage Management
    Views
    450
    Comparisons
    241
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    657
    Rating
    8.5
    11th
    out of 27 in Storage Management
    Views
    253
    Comparisons
    102
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    531
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HPE Storage Essentials, HPE Storage Operations Manager
    OCI
    SolarWinds SRM
    Learn More
    Overview

    With Micro Focus Storage Essentials, you can manage complexity and growth, improve storage utilization and reduce cost, and align storage service to business needs.

    NetApp OnCommand Insight management software delivers consistent insight across your data center so you can monitor and manage your hybrid IT multivendor storage, compute, and switching infrastructures.

    The storage monitoring and capacity management software from SolarWinds gives you deep visibility into the performance of your multi-vendor storage arrays, and helps you closely watch the application stack for storage issues that affect application performance.

    Sample Customers
    Etty Hillesum Lyceum, University of Cincinnati, Lancaster Central School District
    Société Générale, TechnologyOne
    NetSuite, Youngs Seafood, APS Bank, Sven Meinks
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Energy/Utilities Company17%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Government13%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization73%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Government3%
    University3%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business6%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise86%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise82%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business7%
    Midsize Enterprise77%
    Large Enterprise16%
    Buyer's Guide
    Storage Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Dell Technologies, NetApp and others in Storage Management. Updated: March 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.