We performed a comparison between PeopleSoft, SumTotal Systems Talent Portal [EOL], and Workday based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Talent Management."It is a customizable product. We can customize it based on our needs, which is one of the features that I like about PeopleSoft. As far as financial accounting is concerned, the user interface is very good. You can also configure Chart of Accounts for all performance insights."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to use."
"PeopleSoft allows you to schedule upgrades and inform users beforehand. This gives your IT team time to manage the implementation and minimize disruption."
"The solution's scalability is good."
"Flexibility in configuration."
"The customizations allow us to come up with a lot of complex labor rules. In the Philippines, there's a lot of different kinds of rules you need to be in compliance with. The solution offers up a lot of flexibility and customization that is perfect for our region's requirements."
"I use the reporting feature occasionally to check for potential improvements in timesheets. We have integrated it with Power BI."
"The time system is what we get the most benefit from."
"System usability has improved to a large extent and our manual effort has been reduced."
"Workday is easy to use. Timesheet and resource management are also easy."
"In terms of customization, while it may not be fully customizable, you can configure the features based on the foundation that Workday offers. This allows you to take the basic features and tailor them to the specific needs of your company or business. It provides a lot of configuration flexibility."
"The most valuable feature of Workday is the ease of navigation to browse the application. The solution can hold information about the company and people with accounts can be discovered by others in the whole company."
"Workday is a holistic HR solution."
"It's actually a cloud-native solution and based on the community for development. It is a very good open architecture and able to interconnect with other systems. And it is very stable and very fast in terms of response."
"We have fewer systems, less manual data entry, and less processing."
"It's intuitive, a very usable tool and it's easy to find the data you're looking for."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the usability, learning, and compliance tools."
"Response time takes very long and requires a person to be awake night and day to benefit from it."
"PeopleSoft lacks integration capabilities."
"PeopleSoft could improve by being more user-friendly. It's somewhat awkward to navigate."
"The UI and user experience are not great, and it's not as feature-rich as today's systems. Furthermore, our implementation does not include all the components we need, like payroll or some other functions."
"Initial setup can be complex without training or use of consultants."
"On the other hand, the more recent push for standardization precludes customized approaches to certain industry requirements."
"My developers want to use more HTML instead of the specialized tool, PeopleTools because, they say, it's better from a user perspective."
"PeopleSoft can improve by having proper connectors. It's very difficult to change some interfaces with the other systems."
"Analytics is one area where this system really needs a large improvement because currently, it has only basic reporting features."
"The finance module of this solution is not great and needs improvement."
"The solution has to work a lot on financial integrations, material management and CRM modules."
"This solution could be made easier to use by continuing to release new improvements."
"The price could be lower."
"My opinion is that this solution can improve the overall integrations and add more automation. I think anything that could be on a self-serve basis would work quite well."
"The user interface could be modernized somehow."
"There is a lot of complexity in the configuration of this solution."
"It is very unique as compared to other tools in terms of the employee master data and how it is organized. That's why sometimes the information needs to sit in two different systems because, in Workday, it is organized differently. This issue is not related to benefits. It is more or so related to how you categorize employees. I don't think this is a problem that could be solved. Workday is aware of this. It is one of those kinds of situations that you just got to live with."
More SumTotal Systems Talent Portal [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points