CyberArk Identity vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] vs Keeper comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CyberArk Identity, IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL], and Keeper based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO).
To learn more, read our detailed Single Sign-On (SSO) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Identity are its ability to control access to administrative staff.""The solution helps with auditing, and monitoring, and integrates with Splunk for log analysis. User activity logs are captured in CyberArk Identity and sent to external tools like Splunk for analysis and monitoring.""The initial setup of CyberArk Identity was straightforward.""The initial setup is straightforward. It takes me up to an hour and a half.""CyberArk Identity is a mature product.""I found the solution to be stable.""I like the RBAC (Role-Based Access Control). It basically involves defining various roles, and then simply assigning those roles to users.""The feature that we find most valuable is the ability to integrate multiple IDs for on-premises Active Directory."

More CyberArk Identity Pros →

"The integration effort with the end application is quite straightforward and easy.""OAuth 2 is now the de facto standard for API protection and scoped authorized delegation. IBM TAM now supports OAuth 2 and can act as fully compliant OAuth 2 authorization server.""The Verify feature: A push method which customers are going for.""SAML 2.0.""Single Sign-On functionality is valuable because the core purpose of the product is to allow universal (or bespoke) SSO for application suites."

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Pros →

"I can access my passwords from any Internet connected device.""We can access our sign-ins and passwords on up to five devices per user. This means I can access a given site and my login and password for that site from my home and office computers as well as my phone and iPad.""I like the tool's keyword editor and SSO.""It has a secure password generator that incorporates random creation tools and good security practices, which allows for an easy, quick, organized update and sharing with a work team.""i have only one password to remember, which is the one to get me into Keeper.""I like Keeper's mobility and its accessibility.""Available for Windows platforms and also Mac OS and Linux systems.""Keeper Bridge."

More Keeper Pros →

Cons
"They could improve their UI and make everything more user-friendly.""The solution could be easier to use and I found it to be very complex involving many steps.""CyberArk Identity's GUI is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement.""In terms of a governance platform, it's worth noting that CyberArk doesn't offer a particularly strong one.""The OpenID features could improve in CyberArk Identity.""The user interface could be improved.""In terms of general user feedback, the more security you put in front of a user, the more they complain. So usability and the user experience are always a challenge. So there's always room for improvement.""The product needs to leverage the cloud more, especially in the financial sector, where cloud adoption might be limited. Proper reporting within the cloud is essential. The tool should be more user-friendly to expedite access for users. The current agent-based system poses challenges if a user loses access to the server, making tasks difficult to perform. It should also improve technical support."

More CyberArk Identity Cons →

"An Amazon Machine Image (AMI) for the newer appliance versions for hosting the virtual appliances on AWS will help.""The profiling element is incredibly robust, but also equally as complex, it requires an off-site course to be able to understand the context or the plethora of options available.""Looking at their roadmap, they have a broad grasp of the security features which the industry needs.""The self-service portal needs improvement.""Multi-factor authentication with social integration needs to improve."

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Cons →

"I would like to see a way to store files and photos in the next update​. If it already does this, I have yet to explore it.""The stability of the solution can be improved.""Keeper does not provide password management for mobile apps.""The technical support has no experience.""Its aesthetic needs improvement.""Room for improvement in my eyes would be being able to share my credit cards and other types of information. The only thing they really share is passwords, and you can only do it with one password at a time. When you're trying to share it out or trying to remove it from being shared, you can't do multiple selections.""It would be nice to see this great tool integrate with other tools out there.""Ability to set up password profiles that can predefine custom fields and password complexity."

More Keeper Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."
  • "There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed."
  • "I would rate the tool’s pricing a seven out of ten. The product’s pricing is expensive and is on a yearly basis. You will need to pay around 10,000 GBP for 500 users."
  • "The pricing of CyberArk Identity is competitive."
  • "There could be some additional costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution when you want to develop connectors in CyberArk Identity."
  • "In terms of pricing, BeyondTrust and CyberArk tend to be more expensive, with CyberArk receiving an eight out of ten, in this regard."
  • "CyberArk Identity is an expensive solution."
  • "It's not that affordable compared to Delinea or other products. They're less expensive and allow more customization. For the cost, it is expensive."
  • More CyberArk Identity Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The IBM prices are, as ever, extortionate, even with a business partnership, and high levels of discounts."
  • More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The more users, the better the price. Always opt for the live support."
  • "Free works unless the paid is absolutely necessary."
  • "Pricing might be a little less, but with promo codes and family plan - best offer"
  • "It's definitely worth it and affordable. Their sales team can definitely help scale your needs on licensing and provide pricing options."
  • "Just buy the yearly subscription."
  • "Its cost is relative to the value of the information stored in Keeper."
  • "ROI is hard to know, but it has to be several times the expense of the product."
  • "We chose their optional annual subscription; I believe we paid monthly — I thought it was a good deal."
  • More Keeper Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I like the RBAC (Role-Based Access Control). It basically involves defining various roles, and then simply assigning… more »
    Top Answer:It's not that affordable compared to Delinea or other products. They're less expensive and allow more customization. For… more »
    Top Answer:CyberArk Identity could improve by allowing federation directly or seamlessly, without the need for an Identity… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:I like the tool's keyword editor and SSO.
    Top Answer:Keeper does not provide password management for mobile apps.
    Ranking
    9th
    Views
    989
    Comparisons
    828
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    480
    Rating
    7.9
    Unranked
    In Single Sign-On (SSO)
    Views
    3,067
    Comparisons
    2,948
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    220
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Idaptive
    Tivoli Access Manager, IBM Security Access Manager
    Keeper Security
    Learn More
    Keeper
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

    CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

    • Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
    • Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
    • Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
    • Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

    According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

    IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.

    IBM Tivoli Access Manager is a robust and secure centralized policy management solution for e-business and distributed applications. IBM Tivoli Access Manager WebSEAL is a high performance, multi-threaded Web server that applies fine-grained security policy to the Tivoli Access Manager protected Web object space. WebSEAL can provide single sign-on solutions and incorporate back-end Web application server resources into its security policy.

    Keeper Security is transforming the way businesses and individuals protect their passwords and sensitive digital assets to significantly reduce cyber theft. As the leading password manager and digital vault, Keeper helps millions of people and thousands of businesses substantially mitigate the risk of a data breach. Keeper is SOC 2 Certified and utilizes best-in-class encryption to safeguard its customers. Keeper protects industry-leading companies including Sony, Chipotle, and The University of Alabama at Birmingham. Keeper partners with global OEMs and mobile operators to preload Keeper on smartphones and tablets. Learn more at https://keepersecurity.com.

    Sample Customers
    MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido
    Essex Technology Group Inc.
    At&t, Wells Fargo, Disney, GM, Chase, Honeywell, Samsung, Dow
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Computer Software Company30%
    Insurance Company10%
    Consumer Goods Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Insurance Company8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Insurance Company25%
    Government25%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    REVIEWERS
    Insurance Company13%
    Religious Institution13%
    Engineering Company13%
    Healthcare Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise37%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise65%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise62%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business54%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise29%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Single Sign-On (SSO)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.