Automic Workload Automation vs IBM Workload Automation vs Rocket Zena comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Workload Automation, IBM Workload Automation, and Rocket Zena based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Workload Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We use it with automation, getting more speed to solve business processes.""Automic is perfect to work with for a lot of job loads.""We have a lot of governance and compliance requirements as a bank that we can fulfill with this product.""Automic Workload Automation is a highly complex yet versatile tool.""Stability has been great. My team, we call ourselves "the invisibles" because things run so well that sometimes you almost feel like you have to try to break something to actually get acknowledged.""It is 100% stable. We have no downtime. We have 24/7 production throughout the year.""The most important and critical process business in the bank, including COB, closed or business, which has to run on a daily basis, is automated.""We are able to control and change our processes when necessary."

More Automic Workload Automation Pros →

"The most important feature is the creation of folders. It's a really great feature because you can organize the process with naming conventions.""The project we worked on involved the running of nearly 24,000 job instances in a single day, so I would say that the solution is stable.""Jobs can be triggered in multiple nodes.""Jobs can be triggered in multiple nodes.""The support from Cisco is very good. I was with them as a company for 40 years""The whole product is valuable because it is a tool for batch automation.""I have supported this product in literally 100s of different environments and its unmatched in its ability to scale to any size.""Technical support from IBM is very good."

More IBM Workload Automation Pros →

"In the latest upgrade, Zena added a web-based client. The more I use it, the more I like it. It's an excellent interface. They do a good job of steadily improving the solution to make it more useful.""From a Linux configuration point of view, Rocket Zena is straightforward. It's fairly easy to set up the server and agents once you know how to do it.""You can click Ctrl-G and bring a diagram view. You're able to view in a diagram format. The view that it provides is easy, and you can move to the left, up, or down. You can double-click on a certain process. It'll drill into that process and all of its underlying components. You can double-click on an arrow or a component, and it'll bring up a screen that'll have all the variables that are assigned to that particular piece, as well as the values at run time. So, the diagram feature of it, at least for me, is pretty valuable.""The most valuable feature is the FTP file transfer.""I have found the scheduling feature the most valuable. I can map dependencies by using ASG-Zena. It gives a nice, quick visualization as to where things are.""We haven't had any problems since we installed it. It runs as expected, we haven't had any critical problems. It helps keeps the business running 24/7.""I have used other tools with similar capabilities; it's the ease of use.""I like the whole product, but specifically, I like the license part. It's very easy to acquire a license for this product."

More Rocket Zena Pros →

Cons
"Every time we have an upgrade for a new version, we have stability problems, because the versions are not as good as they should be.""There are some monitoring features that could be added.""From my point of view, the current product needs more stability.""The search is sometimes a little bit slow.""We would like some advantages, which we had with the Java UI, with the automation engine.""There has to be a better way to visualize things in the application without having so many windows open.""Our recent experience with technical support has not been good, because it took a couple of months to get feedback. Traces and reports were sent, but were not analyzed for at least two months before providing feedback, and they did not give the right traces. This took two months to find out, so that was not too good.""I would like to see the event engine in the next release."

More Automic Workload Automation Cons →

"Slow down on the releases a bit. I fully understand that IWA functionality is increasing at an amazing rate, but trying to keep up with the upgrades is rough.""The configuration of IBM Workload Automation has some challenges. We have a difficult time customizing it, but it is similar to other solutions.""It is missing some features and can improve in areas where the competition is somewhat better like linking job dependencies.""Scalability-wise, it can be a little bit challenging.""It would be helpful to have a mobile app that could be used to follow the job schedule.""The performance of the previous versions could be better.""The schedule refreshes daily and that's a challenge for us.""This solution does have bugs and could be improved in this regard. However, these bugs are resolved relatively quickly."

More IBM Workload Automation Cons →

"Rocket Zena is a mainframe-based job scheduler. I would like it to be more open so that we can use it on a distributed platform.""In the web interface, it stacks the tasks across the top, and they accumulate until you close or clean those out. That seems a little cumbersome. You must right-click and close all tabs constantly to keep the console clean and manage your views.""In the next release, I would like the user experience to be improved. The user interface should be more appealing to gen-z.""Another one that is probably a little bit bigger for me is that when there is an issue or there's an error, it writes on a different screen. I have to find the actual process name and go to a different screen to view the alert that got generated. On that screen, everyone's processes, not just the processes of the folks in my department, are thrown. It takes me a while to find the actual error so that I could go in there and look at the alert. It could be because of the way it was set up, but at least for me, it isn't too intuitive.""The documentation has room for improvement.""One area where it could be improved is communication between the different servers. Sometimes there are processes that have already been completed but we get a status notification that they're still active.""The UI is not intuitive, and it would be nice if there was a web interface.""In the next release, I would like to have an alert feature to indicate when an agent is down. Rocket Zena is not capable of sending alerts that the agent is down. As of now, you have manually monitor to see when the agent is down."

More Rocket Zena Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Automatic is heavily integrated in our organization. The cost to change would be a huge factor for us, and we have not found any other product that is better out there."
  • "Do your own proof of concept. Make sure you know what you want. Be clear about what you want the product to do for you. Go out and meet with the vendor, then test it."
  • "The cost of arrays is high. If you want to buy an array for an application, and see value from it, you need about half a million dollars. That is too expensive."
  • "It costs to scale. While, it is scalable, the add-ons are expensive."
  • "It has helped us reduce costs."
  • "You do not need any humans to start jobs, so you can save a lot of money."
  • "We have received a lot of time and cost efficiencies from using the product."
  • "We cannot use all the functions because they are too expensive."
  • More Automic Workload Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "To my knowledge, IWA is the only WLA product that will provide "parallel tracking" capability to assist in upgrading from one platform to IWA."
  • "It is about one-third of the cost of a controller."
  • "The contract is with the customer with whom we are working, so IBM is not directly involved in this."
  • "We transitioned from a server license to per job license, and that saved us a lot money."
  • "Pricing depends on the number of agents that you install."
  • More IBM Workload Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I don't know the exact cost, but I believe that it is approximately $150 to $180,000.00 Singapore dollars per year. This would be approximately $100 to $120,000 USD per year."
  • "The pricing and the licensing are good. It is affordable and can be used to improve and optimize productivity."
  • More Rocket Zena Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is easy to manage complex workloads and use electronic workflow automation.
    Top Answer:The solution was flexible in terms of pricing. We're moving away from it, not due to price, but rather based on our… more »
    Top Answer:The AI capabilities and predictive modeling aren't very good. I don't see a future for that. It's very basic. That's… more »
    Top Answer:Sometimes we have issues with the solution's stability. So, stability can be improved. Reporting and visibility of the… more »
    Top Answer:We are using IBM Workload Automation to run batch operations. The development teams batches, and the team that makes a… more »
    Top Answer:In the latest upgrade, Zena added a web-based client. The more I use it, the more I like it. It's an excellent… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing and the licensing are good. It is affordable and can be used to improve and optimize productivity.
    Top Answer:In the web interface, it stacks the tasks across the top, and they accumulate until you close or clean those out. That… more »
    Ranking
    7th
    out of 49 in Workload Automation
    Views
    4,737
    Comparisons
    2,486
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    661
    Rating
    8.3
    13th
    out of 49 in Workload Automation
    Views
    5,157
    Comparisons
    3,509
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    8.0
    12th
    out of 49 in Workload Automation
    Views
    2,486
    Comparisons
    1,473
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    999
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Automic Dollar Universe
    IBM Tivoli Workload Scheduler, IBM TWS
    ASG-Zena
    Learn More
    Rocket Software
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Broadcom's Automic Workload Automation (AWA) stands out as a robust and advanced solution in the field of workload automation and orchestration. Designed for complex enterprise environments, it enables organizations to automate, manage, and optimize their IT workflows and business processes. This solution is particularly beneficial for IT professionals and business executives seeking to enhance operational efficiency, reduce manual workload, and drive digital transformation.

    Automic Workload Automation offers a unified platform for managing diverse tasks across various environments and applications. This centralization simplifies the orchestration of workflows, enhancing visibility and control. IT professionals appreciate this feature as it allows for streamlined management and more efficient resource utilization. AWA's architecture is designed to scale with the growing demands of businesses. It supports a broad range of applications and platforms, making it a versatile tool for different IT environments.

    AWA's analytics and reporting capabilities provide deep insights into workflow performance and potential bottlenecks. This aspect is particularly valuable for data-driven decision-making, helping organizations to optimize processes and improve overall efficiency. The ability to integrate seamlessly with a wide array of applications, databases, and systems, facilitates smooth and automated workflows across various IT landscapes, crucial for enterprises that utilize a mix of legacy and modern applications.

    Automic Workload Automation users on PeerSpot.com have highlighted several strengths; IT professionals frequently commend its robust scheduling capabilities, noting that it handles complex dependencies and scenarios with ease. The intuitive user interface is also frequently mentioned, simplifying the task of managing and monitoring automated workflows. Business executives, on the other hand, appreciate the solution's contribution to strategic business initiatives, such as digital transformation and cloud migration, due to its advanced automation capabilities.

      IBM Workload Automation is a complete solution for batch and real-time workload management, available for distributed mainframe or hosted in the cloud. Use it to drive business and IT workloads on hosted servers, with virtually no cost of ownership for your central server. Increase your productivity with powerful plan- and event-driven scheduling, and run and monitor your workloads wherever you are. This includes interfaces dedicated to application developers and operators, providing them both autonomy and precise governance.

      Zena enables you to optimize business process flows with advanced workload automation that reduces manual intervention, system downtime, and processing errors. You can easily define processes and tasks, making them repeatable so you can focus on other priorities.

      Zena gives you the power to simplify management of complex cross-platform processes while making it easier to manage challenging hybrid IT operations environments. It speeds time-to-market while reducing the ongoing total cost of ownership associated with workload automation and enterprise application processing.

      With Zena, IT leaders have the power to visualize and manage the execution of thousands of workloads across end-to-end Operational processes, while increasing the quality, velocity, and efficiency of their delivery.

      Rocket Zena Features

      Rocket Zena offers the following features:

      • Optimization of process flows: Rocket Zena allows you to optimize complex business process flows across your hybrid IT infrastructure, spanning from mainframe to cloud. It provides full visibility into your operations processes end-to-end.

      • Simplification of operations: The solution simplifies the management of complex cross-platform processes, making it easier to handle challenging hybrid IT operations environments.

      • Advanced workload automation: Rocket Zena offers advanced workload automation capabilities for operations. It reduces manual intervention, system downtime, and processing errors by enabling you to define processes and tasks that are repeatable.

      • Visualization and management of workloads: IT staff can visualize and manage the execution of thousands of workloads across end-to-end operational processes. It enhances the quality, velocity, and efficiency of delivery.

      • Maximize workload automation flexibility: Zena features a graphical process whiteboard for task definition, minimizing redundant definitions and maximizing flexibility in designing workflows.

      • Integration with ease and at scale: The solution seamlessly integrates workload management on multiple platforms and facilitates the integration of critical applications with newer technologies, eliminating manual scripting and reducing overall costs.

      • Centralized scheduling management: It enables centralized scheduling management through a console with dashboard capabilities. Zena provides predefined and customizable views and reports to meet individual user needs.

      • Production statistics and reports: Zena simplifies monitoring and intervention by providing customizable dashboards. It offers drill-down capability to quickly navigate to problem areas and take necessary action.

      • Improved operational excellence: The solution helps optimize business process flows through advanced workload automation, increasing productivity and scalability. It also reduces operational complexity and ensures high process completion by automating complex processes with reliability and repeatability.

      • Integration with applications and platforms: Zena connects with a range of applications and platforms such as Microsoft SQL Server, Docker, Amazon Web Services, Oracle, Micro Focus, SAP, PeopleSoft, and more, allowing seamless integration within your workflows.

      • DevOps and value stream management: Users have access to design-time configuration of DevOps value streams, enables the use of variables for reusable and customized workflows, and provides monitoring and management of run-time execution of value streams.

      • Branching and condition management: Zena allows specifying critical branching for tasks with infinite conditions to ensure automation flows meet business requirements.

      • Mainframe and hybrid cloud support: The solution has the capability to span mainframe to cloud environments, distributing work across the entire IT ecosystem, including hybrid cloud environments and sysplex awareness on mainframes.

      Rocket Zena Benefits

      Some of the benefits of using Rocket Zena are:

      • Optimization of operational business flows

      • Simplification of complex cross-platform processes

      • Reduction of manual intervention, system downtime, and processing errors

      • Speeding up time-to-market

      • Lowering the total cost of ownership associated with workload automation

      • Enhanced visibility and management of workloads across end-to-end operational processes

      • Maximizing workload automation flexibility

      • Seamless integration with multiple platforms and applications

      • Centralized scheduling management with customizable views and reports

      • Improved operational excellence and reliability

      • Reviews from Real Users

        Akash Vishwakarma, a RPA Developer at a consultancy observes: "Its FTP feature is very good, as is scheduling any process or task with the Zena client. I have found it to be very helpful. If a task fails, it gives you a prompt."

        Gus Calero, a Sr. IT Product Manager at a healthcare company shares his view: “You're able to view in a diagram format. The view that it provides is easy, and you can move to the left, up, or down. You can double-click on a certain process. It'll drill into that process and all of its underlying components.”

        Bridgette Friedman, a System administrator at a wholesaler shares her experience: "In the latest upgrade, Zena added a web-based client. The more I use it, the more I like it. It's an excellent interface. They do a good job of steadily improving the solution to make it more useful."


      Sample Customers
      ING, Adidas, 84.51, ESB
      Standard Life Group, Banca Popolare di Milano, A*STAR, ArcelorMittal Gent
      Fraternidad Muprespa
      Top Industries
      REVIEWERS
      Financial Services Firm29%
      Manufacturing Company13%
      Insurance Company11%
      Retailer11%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm22%
      Computer Software Company11%
      Manufacturing Company10%
      Retailer6%
      REVIEWERS
      Financial Services Firm26%
      Manufacturing Company16%
      Computer Software Company11%
      University5%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm34%
      Computer Software Company8%
      Insurance Company8%
      Manufacturing Company8%
      REVIEWERS
      Financial Services Firm38%
      Government25%
      Healthcare Company13%
      Wholesaler/Distributor13%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm27%
      Insurance Company17%
      Computer Software Company11%
      Manufacturing Company10%
      Company Size
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business17%
      Midsize Enterprise17%
      Large Enterprise67%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business13%
      Midsize Enterprise12%
      Large Enterprise75%
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business7%
      Midsize Enterprise3%
      Large Enterprise90%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business11%
      Midsize Enterprise7%
      Large Enterprise82%
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business30%
      Large Enterprise70%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business13%
      Midsize Enterprise5%
      Large Enterprise82%
      Buyer's Guide
      Workload Automation
      March 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation. Updated: March 2024.
      765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.