IBM B2B Integrator vs OpenText Trading Grid vs SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
1,736 views|843 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
608 views|427 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
SPS Commerce Logo
66 views|39 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM B2B Integrator, OpenText Trading Grid, and SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.
To learn more, read our detailed Business-to-Business Middleware Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We pay an annual fee based on the number of VPUs. It's fairly reasonable. We're in the middle of analyzing other products, and they're all pretty much in the same range."
  • "The solution is priced at $20,000 to $30,000 per year with no extra costs."
  • "The pricing is based on how many cores are used and the type of cores."
  • "Licensing depends upon the package you opt for within the solution. The solution is a bit costly compared to the other integration tools in the market."
  • "The price of IBM B2B Integrator is too high. However, IBM may be willing to give a discount if there are negotiations. If they see that there is a good opportunity for them they can provide a discount."
  • "The product costs more than 40K."
  • More IBM B2B Integrator Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
  • "It is expensive to my liking but there is a value attached to having peace of mind that they will help you out if you need their support."
  • More SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:IBM B2B Integrator is a great tool, robust, reliable, low-maintenance, and ideal solution.
    Top Answer:API integration could be improved. The legacy system could be on the cloud.
    Top Answer:The solution is easy to implement.
    Top Answer:The pricing is moderate. I'd rate the solution three out of five in terms of affordability.
    Top Answer:If you are on Trading Grid and you're trying to fetch the data, for example, the IDoc from SAP or the transfer data… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    1,736
    Comparisons
    843
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    450
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    608
    Comparisons
    427
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    783
    Rating
    8.0
    4th
    out of 17 in EDI
    Views
    66
    Comparisons
    39
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Gentran Integration Suite
    Trading Grid, GXS Trading Grid
    Fulfillment (EDI), Trading Partner Integration Center
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM B2B Integrator helps you securely integrate complex B2B processes with your partner communities. It provides a single, flexible B2B gateway that enables your organization to meet a wide range of B2B integration needs. The solution can improve business processes beyond enterprise boundaries and increase visibility into and across supply and demand chains.

    OpenText Trading Grid (formerly GXS) is a unique global integration platform that enables and streamlines cross enterprise business processes. With extreme flexibility and a service-oriented, business-to-business e-commerce platform, the Grid helps companies automate global trading communities by shielding complexity from rapidly changing standards, eliminating manual and duplicative efforts and enabling a new level of process integration and business intelligence.

    With SPS Commerce Fulfillment, you'll have an entire team of trusted advisors ready to help you gain more from your EDI and achieve 100% compliance and ongoing success with your retailer, grocer and distributor trading partners. Our full-service solution is fast, reliable and scalable and can handle your most complex fulfillment requirements for any trading partner, across any channel, including stores, e-commerce and marketplaces.

    Sample Customers
    Bonnie Plants, Toshiba Europe, Florida Hospital
    Autoliv, Hella, Hutchinson, Michelin
    Pet Supplies Plus, Royce Leather, J.R. Watkins Co., Zumba, Deva Concepts, River of Goods, Brooks Sports Inc., Crocs Inc., Redcat Racing, THOS. BAKER, Rugs Direct, WMH Tool Group
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Transportation Company13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Logistics Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Retailer9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Retailer10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Retailer12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Wholesaler/Distributor10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business-to-Business Middleware
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.