We performed a comparison between Ranorex Studio, Tricentis Tosca, and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."I like the recording function and Ranorex Spy."
"This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite."
"Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is its user-friendly interface."
"I'm from a UFT background, so Ranorex Studio has a similar feel in terms of how it handles objects. It just felt familiar even though I'd never seen it before. However, it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of UFT, but it's a pretty good start, and it's cost-effective."
"The solution is fast and includes built-in libraries that record and playback."
"Easy integration with CI Tools like Jenkins, TFS, and TeamCity."
"The most valuable features of Tricentis Tosca are the ease of use, you do not need to program if you do not want to."
"The tool's most valuable feature is Tosca Commander."
"Tricentis Tosca is well integrated with other products like Jira."
"We can also create customized functions. For example, if something isn't supported in Tricentis Tosca Commander, we can create our own function to integrate it with Tosca Commander, so we can utilize it and integrate with the macros."
"Tricentis Tosca is a really cool tool that you don't have to be technical to use it. Additionally, the solution is easy to use. The modules, libraries, and reusable are in an efficient way to update all the tests. I find it spot on with that. We also started using the design which we switched from Excel. The design was superior to Excel."
"It has helped teams within our organization become more aware of the testing requirements in terms of risk and priority."
"It's been very helpful to have connectivity with mobile. The tool also identifies some of the actual changes from the recordings on the actual testing suite. That is something that I really like."
"The technical support is good, we were satisfied."
"Customization is the most powerful feature of this product."
"We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available."
"It is a very common and strong product. A lot of support is available for this product."
"The stability has always been very good."
"The tool has highly detailed debugging features."
"Visual Studio Test Pro is super helpful for my Microsoft app work."
"The documentation is easy, and it helps us solve our problems."
"Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software."
"Ranorex is used in Windows while other solutions, for example, Katalon Studio, are cross-platform. (But in my opinion, overall, Ranorex is better)."
"The object detection functionality needs to be improved."
"There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman."
"The solution's technical support team could be responsive."
"The solution does not support dual or regression testing."
"We are mainly working for manufacturing OEMs but the integration is not available. It would be a benefit if they built one integration tool for all the Teamcenter home servers and software as the main PLM data source. It is a simple process at this time, the integration could be made easier."
"If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it."
"The automation of the SAP application could perhaps be improved to make it much simpler."
"While the initial setup was straightforward, we required assistance with the configuration to ensure that everything was done correctly."
"First, Tricentis could improve Tosca's Linux scripting. We can automate Linux scripting, but there are a few commands that Tosca doesn't support. DVS support and the object identification mechanism could also be better."
"Security, UI, and basic performance improvements could be done to the product to enhance its use."
"Making it more stable would be good because we get around 90% stability."
"In Tosca, I see that there are no user guides."
"I would like to be able to manage different projects in one repository or have better data exchange between repositories."
"The solution should work with the Linux platform. Right now, it only runs on Windows."
"Tricentis Tosca's performance could be better. Sometimes when we are remapping or when it is loading it can take a lot of time. There are free solutions that have better performance in this area."
"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."
"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its stability."
"One of the problems with this solution is you need to be highly technically skilled to operate it, it is not for everyone."
"The data flow can be improved."
"The solution's documentation could be improved for beginners."
"The solution's documentation could be improved because it keeps disappearing from the solution."
"It is not good in terms of performance. When you open Visual Studio, you have to wait for a while to process your code. It uses a lot of resources and has a lot of features. If we could disable some of the features, it would be lighter and faster to use. Nowadays, for some of the projects, we use VS Code for JavaScript or Python. VS Code is very light and easy to use, whereas, in Visual Studio, we have to wait because it takes time to compile or run a project. It has a lot of competitors in terms of performance, such as Intelligent ID. Intelligent ID is very easy to use. It has many features, and it is lighter to use than Visual Studio. In terms of error handling, sometimes, it shows an error before you finish your code, which can be improved. It would be good if it has a version for Linux. I use VS Code on Linux, but I am not sure if Visual Studio has a version for Linux."
"The server that we use is very slow so that is concerning for us."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
