We performed a comparison between IBM Integration Bus, Mule ESB, and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."I have found IBM Integration Bus is very useful because it can integrate multiple backend applications."
"The product is a user-customized tool so that you can adjust it to your specific needs pretty well with little trouble."
"I have found the inbound and outbound adapter confirmations valuable."
"I really like SQL integration nodes, HTTP nodes, event handling, event monitoring, the performance of the solution."
"IBM Integration Bus has a complete set of tools that are implemented between rules when it comes to run time, but it's not easy to understand."
"This solution is very reliable and it is easy to learn."
"I am into microservices using Java Spring Boot, but if we are using legacy systems, IBM Integration Bus is very good for them. They have their own computational logic called EC12, their own proprietary language. You can do any kind of complex logic and can implement other ESVs that I have seen."
"The stability is mostly pretty good."
"The product offers a community edition that is free of cost."
"We can use Java expressions anywhere in the flow."
"The most valuable features of Mule ESB are its ease of use, documentation, ease to adapt to newer security and vulnerabilities, and a lot of help available. Additionally, there is a lot of flexibility, many patches available, and they provide APIs. They are a market standard."
"Mule ESB has a user-friendly design, and everything is in one place. The API and architecture are popular right now. Also, MuleSoft has a large and supportive online community."
"The most valuable feature is the Salesforce integration."
"The solution offers multiple deployment options."
"It was pretty fast to develop APIs on this platform, which is something I liked about it. So, the time to value was pretty good."
"I like that it's user-friendly. Compared to other ESBs, I find it easier to use. I like it better than other ESBs. I like the connectors, which make calling the APIs through the routers easier."
"It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine)."
"When it comes to the user interface, I'm already really used to it. I cannot say anything against it. For me, it's easy to use."
"Given that you have one integration API in place, it takes very minimal effort to scale it to any other application that might want to use the same. Its flow-based development environment is a breeze and makes it really easy to re-use most of the existing components and build up a new API."
"Broker and UM are the best features."
"The most valuable feature of the webMethods Integration Server is the built-in monitoring, auditing, RETS, and SOAP services."
"We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting."
"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."
"All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value."
"The version of the technology and current knowledge is a bit outdated."
"The solution needs to improve it's security and its proactive notification of security issues."
"The performance needs to be enhanced when working with the Toolkit."
"I would rate the support from IBM Integration Bus a seven out of ten. They are very helpful but sometimes it takes too long for them to respond."
"Sometimes migration takes too long."
"I would like to be able to run and install this solution on different platforms."
"IBM doesn't really have a very strong community surrounding the product. Most of its direct competitors are open source solutions, and those have an excellent and well-developed community around the tech to help users navigate the ins and outs of the product. IBM is lacking in this area."
"Session management can sometimes hand forcing server reboots."
"There are limitations with the subscription model that comes with the product."
"It would be much more beneficial if the solution included AI and business process management."
"The current version will not be supported for much longer."
"The solution isn't as stable as we'd like it to be. There are some ongoing issues and therefore Mule has to provide frequent patches. Mule's core IP should be more stable overall."
"The price of Mule ESB could improve."
"It needs more samples. Also, the dependency on Maven should be removed."
"MuleSoft isn't as mature as some other integration technologies out there like IBM WebSphere. There's room for growth, and MuleSoft is working toward that."
"The payment system needs improvement."
"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData."
"The product must add more compatible connectors."
"Version control is not very easy. The packages and the integration server are on Eclipse IDE, but you can't compare the code from the IDE. For example, if you are working on Java code, doing version control and deployment for a quick comparison between the code isn't easy. Some tools or plug-ins are there, such as CrossVista, and you can also play with an SVN server where you have to place your package, and from there, you can check, but you have to do that as a separate exercise. You can't do it from the IDE or webMethods server. You can't just right-click and upload your service."
"The initial setup of the webMethods Integration Server is not easy but it gets easier once you know it. It is tiresome but not difficult."
"We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable."
"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."
"For code version control, you need to use some external software."
"Rapid application development has to be considered, especially for UI, where user interference is crucial."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →