We performed a comparison between Array AG Series, Citrix Gateway, and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Citrix, Ivanti and others in SSL VPN."What I appreciate most about the Array AG Series, and what our clients value as well, is its exceptional stability."
"What I find most valuable about this solution, is that it runs seamlessly."
"The solution is stable."
"The stability of the solution is perfect."
"The solution is very stable. If I were to rate it out of ten, I would give stability a nine."
"Its ease of use and how everybody can easily work through it are the most valuable features."
"Providing our organization the ability to work remotely was the most valuable feature of Citrix Gateway. I also enjoy that they are always adding features."
"The solution has very flexible configuration."
"The session monitoring capability is good."
"We like is how they integrate nicely with the Oracle PeopleSoft application."
"The combination of ADC and WAN is good."
"The F5 interface is easy to use."
"It is a very good, flexible solution. It helps us to catch up on flaws in our partner solutions on top of its load balancing feature."
"The Local Traffic Manager (LTM) provides a simple low balance and SSL decryption, in addition to some TCP parameters, for incoming and outgoing traffic to redirect appropriate traffic patterns to appropriate servers."
"The setup is pretty easy."
"We are fond of the load balancing feature for DNS and servers."
"The configuration and integration into the AWS environment was pretty easy."
"The main area for improvement with Array AG Series is its support services."
"I would like to see improved logging because it doesn't keep much information for the session monitoring or historical sessions."
"If there is an increase in the customer infrastructure, it is not stable."
"We are currently looking at automation. It would be good if there is some way to automate it in a fast way. It should be easy to automate. It also has some security issues."
"As an organization, our initiative is to move to the cloud, Citrix Gateway needs to improve its cloud capabilities and make the cloud solution more robust."
"The initial setup could be made easier."
"If the solution had a more advanced DNS, it would be an improvement."
"While connectivity is not something that is under Citrix's control, if the connectivity is spotty, it can be difficult."
"Sometimes the input-output has issues."
"I would like to see better integration."
"The synchronization does works fairly well. However, if I were to make changes, I would make it easier to start the sync process."
"In terms of native integrations, there is a lot of instability. Also, integration is not robust with F5."
"Security enhancement should be more user friendly."
"To improve the product, they could add more load balancing solutions in Kubernetes."
"Certificate management needs improvement. I would like automated deployment of new certificates without manual intervention to be in the next release of this product."
"My only point of contention would be that it is a little pricey."
"There are issues with F5 BIG-IP but they are minor issues not affecting production and services. Sometimes the operations and the facility systems fail. However, there is an alert action from the windows. An ordeal for the manager."
More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Pricing and Cost Advice →