IBM ECM vs IBM FileNet vs OpenText Content Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
880 views|761 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
4,953 views|2,995 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
1,921 views|881 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM ECM, IBM FileNet, and OpenText Content Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The scalability is a valuable feature, that we're able to display our documents to so many people.""The tool is a very stable solution with high availability and no information leakage. It has built-in API integration on-site. You can integrate with other components and applications like SAP, Microsoft, Oracle, etc.""The vertical scalability, as we can use it across some of our applications.""The content management is all about you as you can make the same content for minimal purpose solutions applications."

More IBM ECM Pros →

"The product is very stable.""It has increased our productivity.""It allows for multiple people to access content simultaneously.""The important features to me are that it is stable, scalable, and the integration between this platform and the other platforms is very good.""Stability is really good. We fairly recently upgraded a version of it and have not been having any problems. The resources seem to be really good with this version; it is a little easier to troubleshoot issues.""The standout feature for us is undoubtedly the Google-like search functionality, which allows us to search for documents within the system effortlessly. Instead of just querying the document database, this feature retrieves all relevant documents, akin to searching on the internet. It is very easy to use.""It puts governance in place around the content and processes. Access levels can be set to certain parts of the document based on role level.""The most useful feature is its persistent storage. Also, the full-text search and attribute searching are valuable."

More IBM FileNet Pros →

"The tool's implementation has made life easier for customers. It is sold by SAP. The integration between SAP and the solution is good, making it easy to access the documents. It is widely recognized as a market leader in enterprise document management.""I did not face issues with the product's scalability...The solution's technical support is good.""An advantage is integration with your IP directory.""The product can be integrated with different solutions.""We like how the solution allows us to have retention of records and workflows, as well as its fire plan.""It has a robust search but has often been difficult for people to learn."

More OpenText Content Manager Pros →

Cons
"The development platform is not local. For example, you need 100 days in IBM, whereas other platforms, like ServiceNow, need only 20 days.""I would like to see seamless application integration.""I would recommend not going with ECM 8 and going with FileNet instead. It seems like that is the future of the lower-volume repository. It seems like they are moving away from ECM 8.5 so I think we're going to have some challenges coming up, getting off of that technology.""I think it's already getting away from Java applets. A lot of our users struggle with keeping up to date with Java versioning, so a lot of the functions they're doing, like printing, emailing, and even some of the viewing, they're struggling with."

More IBM ECM Cons →

"Simplifying both training and maintenance would be an improvement.""IBM has a lot of documentation but the kind of information in a lot of the documents can be confusing to our clients. It would be easier if they used video tutorials. Right now, the information is too hard to understand, and there is a lot of it. If they used videos I think FinalNet would be easy to use for an end-user.""The usability is fair. It could be a bit better. It could be better designed. They could put more effort into the user experience and do a better job of integrating other components, like Datacap, to be a bit more seamless.""A little better control into the ACLs of FileNet and databases.""I would like to see in FileNet integrated with Watson, which can read something and send it without any human contact or interaction.""The new user interface is not easy to set up, so some improvements along these lines would be good.""We'd like to use the docker, to have it containerized.""I would like to see expanded search features, like content search."

More IBM FileNet Cons →

"Due to very limited use in the industry, vendor and contract support are hard to find.""OpenText Content Manager needs to improve its user interface. Its installation process is difficult and can be made easier.""The product could improve its scalability.""The stability of the solution is an area of concern where improvements can be made.""The ease of use should be addressed.""Support could be enhanced. The first line of support consists of individuals who lack experience with some key aspects. When you create a support ticket, the time to resolve the issue may be prolonged because the first person may not understand the system or the solution."

More OpenText Content Manager Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Reach out to local IBM partners.​"
  • More IBM ECM Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The biggest issue is the cost of the FileNet, because the license cost is very high. If a customer doesn't have good technical guides that are aware of the license calculation, they will pay too much. FileNet's license calculation depends on the processor and number of users. So my advice to a new customer is to be very careful with your calculations before purchasing FileNet."
  • "It is still a leading ECM solution provider, however the cost to implement and maintain are higher than other solutions."
  • "FileNet is not cheap, but you absolutely get what you pay for. ​"
  • "For small scale industries, they allow different options. They can do open source. It is the complexity of the data security that they should think about before they choose."
  • "For the medium scale or large scale, I would recommend FileNet. FileNet is free of licensing expenses, thus good for the money. It is not expensive, but worth for the money, especially for medium scale and large scale industries."
  • "​There are lots of components to the product. Make sure before you invest that you know which components you need.​​"
  • "1. It will be more expensive than estimated to setup. 2. You will need to double the staff while you are running the old system and installing the new system. 3. Depending on the number of documents to be migrated, make sure you understand the potentially massive amount of time and effort required to migrate the existing content to the new platform."
  • "The physical space that we have gained back pays for the service. Therefore, it has reduced our operating costs overall. We have definitely seen ROI. I would estimate $30,000 a year."
  • More IBM FileNet Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I would suggest that you do a thorough evaluation of all competing products and look for support for these products in your local area."
  • "The fees incurred are for the licensing and maintenance."
  • "I rate the product price an eight or nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The solution is expensive."
  • "The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money. You have to pay a one-time cost and support costs."
  • More OpenText Content Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool is a very stable solution with high availability and no information leakage. It has built-in API integration… more »
    Top Answer:The product is expensive and has a perpetual license.
    Top Answer:The development platform is not local. For example, you need 100 days in IBM, whereas other platforms, like ServiceNow… more »
    Top Answer:The product is robust and can process a lot of documents for enterprise content management.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive. The price was 30% higher than what we needed to pay for IBM. I rate the product’s pricing a… more »
    Top Answer:The user interface of IBM content management, including the ability to customize screens without the need for coding… more »
    Top Answer:An advantage is integration with your IP directory.
    Top Answer:The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money… more »
    Top Answer:Support could be enhanced. The first line of support consists of individuals who lack experience with some key aspects… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    880
    Comparisons
    761
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    348
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    4,953
    Comparisons
    2,995
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    408
    Rating
    7.6
    Views
    1,921
    Comparisons
    881
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    410
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Content Manager, HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM Content Foundation on Cloud

    IBM Content Foundation on Cloud allows organizations to deliver extensive enterprise content management capabilities to their users very quickly. IBM Content Foundation is powered by the FileNet content and process platform and IBM Content Navigator user experience. This cloud offering can be leveraged for a variety of use cases including collaborative document management, imaging solutions, social content management, archiving, and more. It also offers a platform for developing Enterprise Content Management (ECM) solutions in the cloud.


     IBM Case Manager on Cloud

    IBM Case Manager on Cloud is a solution platform that engages people with business content, provides contextual insight through real-time analytics, and enhances teamwork through collaboration tools and flexible workflow. Enables Business and IT to work together to create solutions across the enterprise that enables an organization to make smarter decisions for better business outcomes, while balancing the need for security and compliance in a world of heightened risk.

                                   

    IBM FileNet is a leading IBM enterprise content management product family. IBM FileNet is one of the ECM solutions that can change the way a company does business by enabling users to capture, activate, socialize, analyze, and govern content throughout its lifecycle.

    There are many IBM FileNet products available, all of which are integrated and based on the FileNet P8 Platform.

    OpenText Content Manager, formerly Records Manager, is a governance-based enterprise content management system designed to help government agencies, regulated industries and global organizations manage their business content from creation to disposal. Regardless of how you create and collaborate on your content, Content Manager gives you the ability to leverage accurate, contextual, and complete information throughout its lifecycle. Managing your content in this way helps you significantly improve services to your customers, business decisions and insight for future strategy.

    Sample Customers
    KeyBank, Standard Chartered Bank, Union Bank, Sistema Tecnol‹gico de Monterrey, Illinois Department of Human Services, UnitedHealth Group
    Suncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions.
    Missouri State Courts
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm53%
    Insurance Company20%
    Religious Institution7%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Insurance Company10%
    Government10%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Insurance Company16%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government10%
    Insurance Company10%
    REVIEWERS
    Government58%
    Non Profit8%
    Non Tech Company8%
    Sports Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business6%
    Large Enterprise94%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise35%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise55%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.