We performed a comparison between Bizagi, webMethods Integration Server, and WebRatio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."Bizagi is a very useful tool because it does not require you to program. The user logic is very easy to understand even for people who are not engineers or developers."
"Bizagi is flexible. I can share things with other consultants because it is the most commonly used software in my community. It has been a great and good resource for us in making sure that we adhere to the process."
"The initial setup is super simple."
"What I find most valuable is the flexibility, I find it very easy to use and very flexible for my purpose. I can use it without any particular problem, and it's very intuitive and easy to understand."
"I like the integration part, and I also like how they use the database, such as the data when they implement all the data side, and how you can easily integrate it with their widgets."
"It is quite a stable solution."
"The main feature of Bizagi is the speed to which we can automate processes and how we can modify them without a strong impact on the end users."
"I like all of the features. I like that you can simulate the processes and add the time standard."
"Broker and UM are the best features."
"What I like best about webMethods Integration Server is its portfolio of connectors."
"What I found most valuable in webMethods Integration Server is that it's a strong ESB. It also has strong API modules and portals."
"The ease of mapping... is the single largest feature. It gives us the ability to craft anything. A lot of single-purpose technologies, like Mirth, are good for healthcare messages, but we use webMethods not only for healthcare messages but for other business-related purposes, like integrations to Salesforce or integrations to Office 365. It's multi-purpose nature is very strong."
"The solution's ease-of-use is its most valuable feature, in which complex issues may be resolved."
"webMethods Integration Server is an easy-to-use solution and does not require a lot of coding."
"It frankly fills the gap between IT and business by having approval and policy enforcement on each state and cycle of the asset from the moment it gets created until it is retired."
"The most valuable feature is stability."
"The initial setup isn't too complex."
"Bizagi doesn't have integrations with other solutions, such as ERP systems. In the industry and your company, you have a lot of systems with which you need to integrate, but Bizagi doesn't have such integrations, which makes it very difficult. Its scalability can also be improved. It is good for a startup, but when you need something more complex, it is not good."
"Sometimes, when your process is big with multiple lanes, the product will freeze the issue noticed on multiple laptops, not a single PC."
"I'm not really satisfied with the reporting aspect."
"I would like to see simulation as a free feature again. In version 3.3 it was free, but in 4.0 it isn't."
"The performance could use improvement. We couldn't connect the processes to on one file. The performance is an issue for us."
"Its price can be improved. The price is high for the application as well as for maintaining and developing applications. When you develop, for example, a BPM, you need to pay a lot for Bizagi."
"One thing that I don't like very much is related to integration: we have to develop some connectors... I would need a connector that connects to a REST service and that uses client ID in secret... They provide the means to develop a connector and use it, but they should implement this because REST services are among the most used protocols for web services."
"I think that they could improve their update process. Some of the process mining techniques could be added to Bizagi. I think that they can improve their simulation abilities to include more elements of the BPMN."
"We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics."
"The stability of the various modules of the product suite have been a bit of a concern lately. Though their support team is always easy to reach out to, I would prefer it not come to that."
"The solution has big instances when deployed under microservices or in a containerized platform. They need to improve that so that it is competitive with other integration solutions, like Redis and Kafka. Deployments under microservices with those solutions are much more lightweight, in the size of the runtime itself, compared with Software AG."
"Rapid application development has to be considered, especially for UI, where user interference is crucial."
"The Software AG Designer could be more memory-efficient or CPU-efficient so that we can use it with middle-spec hardware."
"As webMethods Integration Server is expensive, that's its area for improvement."
"Forced migration from MessageBroker to Universal Messaging requires large scale reimplementation for JMS."
"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."
"The maintenance aspect is too heavy."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
