We performed a comparison between Cassandra, Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, and Neo4j Graph Database based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."Cassandra is good. It's better than CouchDB, and we are using it in parallel with CouchDB. Cassandra looks better and is more user-friendly."
"I am getting much better performance than relational databases."
"The most valuable features are the counter features and the NoSQL schema. It also has good scalability. You can scale Cassandra to any finite level."
"The most valuable feature of Cassandra is its fast retrieval. Additionally, the solution can handle large amounts of data. It is the quickest application we use."
"Can achieve continuous data without a single downtime because of node to node ring architecture."
"The technical evaluation is very good."
"We can add almost one million columns to the solution."
"I am satisfied with the performance."
"With a cluster available, you can manage the security layer using the shared SDX - it provides flexibility."
"I don't see any performance issues."
"It is helpful to gather and process data."
"It has the best proxy, security, and support features compared to open-source products."
"We experienced many issues when we started working with Hadoop 3.0 in the Cloudera 6.0 version, so there are a lot of things that need to improve. I believe they are working on that."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the enterprise data platform."
"The search function is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"Customer service and support were able to fix whatever the issue was."
"Creates the ability to visualize outputs."
"Enables people to understand what the business problem is and how the technology helps."
"As a graph database, I am surprised at their performance and response time."
"The solution doesn't have joins between tables so you need other tools for that."
"The solution is not easy to use because it is a big database and you have to learn the interface. This is the case though in most of these solutions."
"Maybe they can improve their performance in data fetching from a high volume of data sets."
"Depending upon our schema, we can't make ORDER BY or GROUP BY clauses in the product."
"Fine-tuning was a bit of a challenge."
"There could be more integration, and it could be more user-friendly."
"There were challenges with the query language and the development interface. The query language, in particular, could be improved for better optimization. These challenges were encountered while using the Java SDK."
"Cassandra can improve by adding more built-in tools. For example, if you want to do some maintenance activities in the cluster, we have to depend on third-party tools. Having these tools build-in would be e benefit."
"It could be faster and more user-friendly."
"The governance aspect of the solution should be improved."
"Without the big data environment, we cannot store all of this data live. We have billions of records and terabytes of storage to be used. It's not an option actually for us to have a big data environment."
"Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is not always completely stable in some cases, which can be a concern for big data solutions."
"They should focus on upgrading their technical capabilities in the market."
"The tool's ability to be deployed on a cloud model is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It would be useful if Cloudera had more tools like SQL Engines that offer the traditional relational database. We have to do a lot of work preparing the data outside Cloudera before getting it into the platform."
"The dashboard could be improved."
"There are concerns about performance and whether the tool can necessarily scale to provide the solution."
"So far, we have not had any issues and are happy with the product in general."
More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →
