Jira vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Atlassian Logo
Read 254 Jira reviews
26,976 views|18,379 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
8,911 views|3,853 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Parasoft Logo
200 views|154 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Jira, OpenText ALM / Quality Center, and Parasoft Development Testing Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The adaptability of the Scrum and Kanban boards for other uses, with careful use of the customization features.""The features that we find most valuable are the Workflow, Scrum workflow, and Dashboards.""All of the tracking features are the most valuable because it allows me to see where we stand today and every day.""It is a good defect tracking tool. It has a lot of capabilities and functionalities. There are a lot of graphs and a lot of tracking. It can be sprint-driven if you want.""Jira's collaborative features, such as comments, notifications, and real-time updates, facilitate better communication.""The informatics is the most valuable feature. It captures what we need.""Jira is easy to use and there are a lot of tools that are integrated with it.""This is a user friendly solution."

More Jira Pros →

"Business process management is the most valuable feature of the solution.""ALM is a well-known product and is one of the pioneers in providing test management facilities with a 360 degree view of requirements.""The setup is pretty straightforward.""What they do best is test management. That's their strong point.""The integration with UFT is nice.""The most valuable Quality Center feature, I find, is the solution's integration with some of our automation tools. For us, the ability to capture and record and the ease of use from a user perspective, are all key.""From reporting to team management, everything is better now.""It is a tool, and it works. It has got good linkage and good traceability between the test cases and the defects. It has got lots of features for testing."

More OpenText ALM / Quality Center Pros →

"It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams.""The most valuable feature is code coverage."

More Parasoft Development Testing Platform Pros →

Cons
"I think that there is some ease of use that could be brought in to improve certain things.""Workflows can be improved. We don't use workflows because we can't handle that much complexity. Its interface could be more intuitive for workflows.""Ease of administration and customization. It is really clunky in this area.""For a non-technical person to use, Jira is not intuitive.""Lacks field-level permission in the cloud version.""The reports in Jira can be improved, especially for test reports. I find it difficult to customize and integrate for different testing purposes.""it would be helpful to have a better tutorial for learning and to have a better understanding of what the features are and what they do.""There's been the odd amount of JIRA downtime (not self hosted) and sometimes tickets that can't be accessed."

More Jira Cons →

"They should specify every protocol or process with labels or names.""If the solution could create a lighter, more flexible tool with more adaptability to new methodologies such as agile, it would be great.""There's room for improvement on the reporting side of things and the scheduling, in general, is a bit clunky.""Micro Focus is an expensive tool.""We operate in Sweden, and there are not so many Swedish people that know the product.""The UFT tests don't work very well and it seems to depend on things as simple as the screen resolution on a machine that I've moved to.""There's room for improvement in the requirements traceability with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center. That could use an uplift.""Sometimes I do run my queries from the admin login. However, if I want to reassess all my test cases, then I am still doing this in a manual manner. I write SQL queries, then fire them off. Therefore, a library of those SQL queries would help. If we could have a typical SQL query to change the parameters within test cases, then this is one aspect I can still think that could be included in ALM. Though they would need to be analyzed and used in a very knowledgeable way."

More OpenText ALM / Quality Center Cons →

"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time.""The solution's speed has room for improvement."

More Parasoft Development Testing Platform Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is very cheap if you forego the local instance and stick to the cloud."
  • "The licensing model is annoying. They nickel and dime you."
  • "It does not cost that much."
  • "Almost everybody uses JIRA nowadays because it is the most cost-effective solution."
  • "I understand JIRA is quite expensive."
  • "We feel that the product is a good value for the cost."
  • "Licensing is on a monthly basis, and it is based on what you use."
  • "To try this solution, use their cloud offering to get familiar. After that, it's in my view worth the money."
  • More Jira Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I'd rate the pricing as 3/10 as it's very expensive."
  • "If you have more than five users, a concurrent licensing model should be considered."
  • "For pricing, I recommend to buy a bundled package. Check the HPE site for more details."
  • "The full ALM license lets you use the requirements tab, along with test automation and the Performance Center. You can also just buy the Quality Center edition (Manual testing only), or the Performance Center version (Performance Testing only)."
  • "HPE has one of the most rigid, inflexible, and super expensive license models."
  • "Sure, HP UFT is not free. But consider what you get for that cost: A stable product that is easy to use; the kitchen sink of technology stack support; decades of code (which in many cases actually is free); a version that is a stepping stone to an easier Selenium design; and a support base that is more that just the kindness of strangers."
  • "Seat and concurrent licensing models exist; the latter is recommended if a large number of different users will be utilizing the product."
  • "I feel that the licenses are expensive. ​"
  • More OpenText ALM / Quality Center Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Hi Netanya Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below… more »
    Top Answer:Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and… more »
    Top Answer:HP ALM and Jira can be easily integrated with the aid of a third-party Integration Solution To help you select the… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is the ST Add-In. It's a Microsoft add-in that makes it much easier to upload test cases into… more »
    Top Answer:It was expensive for us. For the first two weeks, we had to employ people now and then as the system needed to be more… more »
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in the scalability and stability of the solution.
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is code coverage.
    Top Answer:The solution's speed has room for improvement.
    Top Answer:We use the Parasoft Development Testing Platform to verify code coverage for static analysis in our unit tests.
    Ranking
    Views
    26,976
    Comparisons
    18,379
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    489
    Rating
    7.8
    Views
    8,911
    Comparisons
    3,853
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    429
    Rating
    7.4
    Views
    200
    Comparisons
    154
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    217
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Jira Software
    Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM
    Parasoft Concerto, Parasoft DTP
    Learn More
    Overview

    Jira is a powerful cloud- and subscription-based application lifecycle and issue management solution. It is designed to aid users both in project management and in resolving any issues that arise at any point in the software development process. It is especially concerned with easing the ability of developers to collaborate. 

    Jira Benefits

    Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Jira include:

    • DevOps lifecycle visibility and planning. Jira provides application developers with tools that enable them to track and visualize where they are in the development process. This means that a DevOps team can measure their progress at all times. Jira’s roadmapping feature also enables a DevOps team to work more efficiently by setting goals for their projects, keeping them on track. Additionally, they are able to track whether they are meeting the goals that they set for their projects.
    • Regular product updates. Atlassian is constantly updating Jira so that it is continuously evolving into an ever more powerful and user-friendly solution. Users can be sure that the product that they are using is always being tweaked so as to provide them with the best possible project management solution. 
    • Flexibility. Jira enables users to customize their workflows and dashboard so that the solution is operating in a way that best matches their needs. Jira can also integrate with more than 3,000 other applications and integrations. Organizations can use it to expand their project management and DevOps capabilities in many different ways. 

    Jira Features

    • Security capabilities. Jira is equipped with a number of useful security features. It gives administrators the ability to restrict access to certain tools so that only users who are authorized to complete certain tasks have access to the tools related to the completion of that task. Users can also set default permissions so that only particular users can work on new projects or particular projects.
    • Real-time notification feature. Users can set Jira so that it offers them notifications that contain critical information in real time. It can send users email notifications when pressing issues have been updated. They can also set it to notify them about tasks that may be due, or other similar events.

    • Activity log. Jira has the ability to track any and all changes that are taking place within the software framework. Users can keep a close eye on everything that is going on. This promotes a high level of visibility and can be leveraged to aid developers in their collaboration efforts. 

    Reviews from Real Users

    Jira is a powerful solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its workflow engine and its highly customizable dashboard. 

    Bharath R., the tool implementation and project management lead at a financial services firm, writes, “I feel the strongest feature of Jira is its workflow engine. It empowers us to automate our workflows within our organization. It's the one characteristic of Jira which I think can help any organization, be it in any domain.”

    Uday J., a staff engineer at a computer company, says, “Another thing that I like a lot about Jira is that in the dashboard, you can plug the modules that you want. You can enable certain sections. For example, you can show trend history, open Jira tickets, etc. Some of the managers have created a dashboard for each engineer.” 

    OpenText ALM/Quality Center serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps you govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes.

    Parasoft DTP aggregates the results from across testing practices, providing intelligent and continuous monitoring of the testing outcomes for greater visibility into what is working — and what isn’t.  Includes:

    - Comprehensive Reports & Dashboards

    - Preconfigured compliance reporting

    - Customized Advanced Analytics

    - Interactive Navigation of Results

    - Traceability

    Sample Customers
    Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.
    Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)
    General Motors, Lockheed Martin, Qualcomm, AAI Textron, Boeing, Fidelity, Johnson & Johnson, CIBC, Penske, Thales, Dell, 
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Insurance Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization42%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Computer Software Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Insurance Company9%
    Healthcare Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization54%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Computer Software Company5%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise47%
    Large Enterprise43%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business7%
    Midsize Enterprise57%
    Large Enterprise36%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.