Bamboo vs GoCD vs Jenkins comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Atlassian Logo
3,414 views|3,401 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Thoughtworks Logo
1,194 views|937 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Jenkins Logo
6,896 views|5,921 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bamboo, GoCD, and Jenkins based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"In my experience Bamboo is scalable.""Bamboo's integration with the rest of Atlassian's tech tools, like Jira, helps manage the end-to-end development and release process.""One of the big things that made us choose Bamboo, is it seamlessly integrates its APIs into NetSuite, which is our main ELP system.""The most valuable features of Bamboo are its performance and UI. Additionally, there are a lot of useful plugins, integration with other solutions, such as Bitbucket and Jira, and a helpful online community.""The most valuable feature of Bamboo is that it is a good tool for CI/CD integration.""It can do the CI pipeline well.""It's one of the best solutions in this line of work. We have many Atlassian products. We use Bamboo, JIRA, Service Desk, and some other Atlassian plugins. We like that it's easy to integrate into each other. It's a suite of services.""The most useful feature of Bamboo is its integration with other solutions such as Jira and BitBucket, also offered by Atlassian. It is easier to use tools all provided by one vendor."

More Bamboo Pros →

"Permission separations mean that we can grant limited permissions for each team or team member.""The most notable aspect is its user interface, which we find to be user-friendly and straightforward for deploying and comprehending pipelines. We have the ability to create multiple pipelines, and in addition to that, the resource consumption is impressive.""The UI is colorful."

More GoCD Pros →

"Has a good interface, is reliable and saves time.""The deployment of traditional Jenkins is easy.""With Jenkins, the pipeline will take your code from any versioning system like GitHub or Bitbucket. All the security scans can happen in one go and then all the tests also get run. You can just build one container in it and deploy it.""A lot of support material exists via a single web search of exactly what you're looking for.""For business needs, Jenkins is the most relevant choice because it can be self-hosted, the price is good, it’s robust, and requires almost no effort for maintenance.""I like the business logs. It's a very useful tool. Client-server communication is also very fast.""The most valuable features of Jenkins are the integration with GitHub, and the automation for deployment.""Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes."

More Jenkins Pros →

Cons
"It should be much easier to use. It shouldn't require a lot of reading to be able to use it. It should have just two or three screens rather than hundreds of screens requiring a lot of clicking. It also requires a lot of integration. It has a steep learning curve. It takes a lot of time to understand and put in the data. There is also no proper training.""The marketing strategy of Bamboo is an area of concern where improvements are needed.""It can be challenging for someone new to the system or ecosystem to grasp, making it difficult to train new people and help them understand.""Bamboo could improve by having compatibility with GitLab. It would be better to have this platform for deploying code and storing container registries. Bamboo does not have a container registry. Additionally, there could be more features added.""Bamboo can improve by providing more with scripting, such as they have with Jenkins. Bamboo is more UI-driven at this time, Jenkins is going in that direction too.""The performance around the deployment feature could be improved.""It would be great if Bamboo could introduce a more containerized deployment model.""Scalability depends on the use case. If it is really a big customer with a lot of tests, it might not be a scalable option for them."

More Bamboo Cons →

"The aspect that requires attention is the user management component. When integrating with BitLabs and authenticating through GitLab, there are specific features we desire. One important feature is the ability to import users directly from GitLab, along with their respective designations, and assign appropriate privileges based on that information. Allocating different privileges to users is a time-consuming process for us.""The documentation really should be improved by including real examples and more setup cases.""The tool must be more user-friendly."

More GoCD Cons →

"Jenkins could simplify the user interface a little bit because it sometimes creates too many features cramped in the UI.""The enterprise version is less stable than the open-source version.""Improvement-wise, I would want the solution's user interface to be changed for the better. In short, the solution can be made more user-friendly.""The documentation could be more friendly, and more examples of how to use it.""Centralized user management would be helpful.""The scriptwriting process could be improved in this solution in the future.""The solution could improve by having more advanced integrations.""The support for the latest Java Runtime Environment should be improved."

More Jenkins Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is a subscription required to use Bamboo."
  • "If Bamboo could provide more flexibility on pricing, that would help. On the agent side, if you want to increase the number of agents it should be less expensive. If they can provide some better pricing model, it will help, whether we are going to use it or are already using it."
  • "The server products for small teams used to offer excellent pricing. However, Atlassian has since changed the offering and the pricing is more expensive. I do still think the solution offers good value for money."
  • "The price of Bamboo is reasonable."
  • "I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten."
  • More Bamboo Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's an open-source and free tool."
  • "This is an open-source solution and it is inexpensive."
  • More GoCD Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is a free product."
  • "Jenkins is open source."
  • "​It is free.​"
  • "Some of the add-ons are too expensive."
  • "It's free software with a big community behind it, which is very good."
  • "I used the free OSS version all the time. It was enough for all my needs."
  • "Jenkins is open source and free."
  • "There is no cost. It is open source."
  • More Jenkins Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    A biased and subjective comparison of Bamboo and Jenkins as CI servers for mobile development, based on practical experience with both. Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (Delivery, Distribution) has been around for quite a while. But surprisingly enough on a global scale it pretty much just got into its teen years in regards to mobile development. Well, subjectively, of course. You can see all levels of mobile CI these days. Some would still install builds from Xcode, others would have a quickly patched up build server under their desk. Xcode Bots meet the needs of yet another group of people. Travis CI is good and for open source projects it’s probably the best option. And guess what, I know few successful iOS development companies that develop apps for enterprise clients, and have no CI at all. The advanced level of CI would include distributed build systems with multiple build nodes, support for automated unit and UI tests, running tests on simulator and physical devices, automatic deployment to TestFlight, Hockey App, Over the Air, and much more. It becomes not just mobile development, but spans into areas like DevOps and others. Etsy’s blog post is somewhat outdated but still a very good example of where this path can take you. If you decide to take mobile CI under your total control, you have to pick a build server to start with. I personally have worked with Bamboo for 1.5 years and I’m dealing with Jenkins right now, so I have few insights… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Bamboo's integration with the rest of Atlassian's tech tools, like Jira, helps manage the end-to-end development and… more »
    Top Answer:I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten.
    Top Answer:The tools and capabilities of the system are extensive. It can be challenging for someone new to the system or ecosystem… more »
    Top Answer:The most notable aspect is its user interface, which we find to be user-friendly and straightforward for deploying and… more »
    Top Answer:GoCD could cover the authentication aspect. Currently, we are handling an in-house development that needs this… more »
    Top Answer:When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your… more »
    Top Answer:Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    3,414
    Comparisons
    3,401
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    542
    Rating
    7.7
    8th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    1,194
    Comparisons
    937
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    631
    Rating
    8.3
    2nd
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    6,896
    Comparisons
    5,921
    Reviews
    39
    Average Words per Review
    386
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    GitLab logo
    Compared 43% of the time.
    GitHub Actions logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Harness logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Microsoft Azure logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    GitLab logo
    Compared 31% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Microsoft Azure DevOps logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    GitHub Actions logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    AWS CodePipeline logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    GitLab logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    AWS CodePipeline logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    IBM Rational Build Forge logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Harness logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Adaptive ALM, Thoughtworks Go
    Learn More
    Overview
    Bamboo is a continuous integration and delivery tool that ties automated builds, tests and releases together in a single workflow. It works great alongside JIRA and Stash providing a fully traceable deployment pipeline.
    GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers businesses a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility. It was designed for continuous delivery and the concepts essential to this practice are built in at the core.

    Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

    Sample Customers
    Neocleus, MuleSoft, Interspire
    Ancestry.com, Barclay Card, AutoTrader, BT Financial Group, Gamesys, Nike, Vodafone, Haufe Lexware, Medidata, Hoovers
    Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company40%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Marketing Services Firm10%
    Non Tech Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Retailer11%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company23%
    Media Company9%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.