Digital.ai Release vs Jenkins vs TeamCity comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Digital.ai Logo
774 views|419 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Jenkins Logo
6,896 views|5,921 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
JetBrains Logo
3,373 views|2,977 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Digital.ai Release , Jenkins, and TeamCity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of Digital.ai Release is its ability to communicate with various deployment systems, such as XLD and batch deployments, as well as integrate with tools, such as Flyway and Bamboo. We use Bamboo as our build orchestrator, and Digital.ai Release also integrates with Jira, another Atlassian solution. These capabilities make it a powerful tool for managing workflow, test automation, and other processes.""The orchestration, building the release, and then just executing it and managing that pipeline — the orchestration capabilities are great for that.""The solution can apply one template across multiple applications."

More Digital.ai Release Pros →

"Jenkins optimizes the CI/CD process, enhances automation, and ensures efficiency and management of our build and deployment pipeline.""I like the business logs. It's a very useful tool. Client-server communication is also very fast.""The deployment of traditional Jenkins is easy.""Jenkins integrates with multiple tools like Bitbucket and makes life easier. We don't have to write a lot of code since a lot of libraries are available.""The solution is scalable and has a large number of plugins that can help you scale it to your needs.""Has a good interface, is reliable and saves time.""We really appreciate that this solution is plug and play. When coding in the version control system, this product completes the build process automatically.""The initial setup is pretty simple."

More Jenkins Pros →

"The integration is a valuable feature.""I have not yet implemented the remote build feature, but this will be a big plus. We want to be able to build legacy products on a build agent without developers needing to have obsolete tool sets installed on their local PC.""TeamCity is very useful due to the fact that it has a strong plug-in system.""The flexibility of TeamCity allows it to fit in workflows that I have yet to imagine.""Using TeamCity and emailing everyone on fail is one way to emphasize the importance of testing code and showing management why taking the time to test actually does saves time from having to fix bugs on the other end.""We would like to see better integration with other version controls, since we encountered difficulty when this we first attempted.""TeamCity's GUI is nice.""VCS Trigger: Provides excellent source control support."

More TeamCity Pros →

Cons
"The solution is a little bit expensive.""The backfill could be improved, we could automate that. Right now it's subjective — it's up to the lead developer's memory to remember to backfill.""Digital.ai Release could improve by having a better plugin that works with Guardian that we use for mainframe migrations. If there could be an interface or plugin for Guardian that would be beneficial."

More Digital.ai Release Cons →

"A more user-friendly UI for creating pipelines would be helpful.""There are a lot of things that they can try to improvise. They can reduce a lot of configurations. It is currently supporting Groovy for scripting. It would be really good if it can be improvised for Python because, for most of the automation, we have Python as a script. It would be good if can also support Python. We have a lot of Android builds. These Android builds can be a part of Jenkins. It can have some plug-ins or configurations for Android builds. There should also be some internal matrix to check the performance. We also want to have more REST API support, which is currently not much in Jenkins. We are not able to get more information about running Jenkins. More REST API support should be provided.""We would like to see the addition of mobile simulators support to this solution, as part of its open-source offering. We currently have to carry out manual testing for these platforms.""In our case, we have several products built using Jenkins. It is quite difficult to navigate into the latest stable build in a given OS.""Jenkins is an open-source solution, and people tend to stay on the same version for a long time. When you look for an answer on Google, you often find something that doesn't relate to your implementation. The plugins are both the aspect of Jenkins and also one of the worst because the plugins can have different versions, so it's hard to figure out how to solve the problems.""For this solution to be a 10, it has to be a lot more stable. Maybe the public version of Jenkins is stable, but in our case it's not stable.""It could be cheaper.""It can be improved by including automated mobile reporting integrations."

More Jenkins Cons →

"The UI for this solution could be improved. New users don't find it easy to navigate. The need some level of training to understand the ins and the outs.""I need some more graphical design.""Last time I used it, dotnet compilation had to be done via PowerShell scripts. There was actually a lot that had to be scripted.""REST API support lacks many features in customization of builds, jobs, and settings.""We've called TeamCity tech support. Unfortunately, all their tech support is based in Europe, so we end up with such a big time crunch that I now need to have one person in the US.""If there was more documentation that was easier to locate, it would be helpful for users.""Integrating with certain technologies posed challenges related to time and required support from the respective technology teams to ensure smooth integration with TeamCity.""I would suggest creating simple and advanced configurations. Advanced configurations will give more customizations like Jenkins does."

More TeamCity Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Overall, the price is just too high; especially considering we're in the middle of a pandemic."
  • "The solution's license includes all features."
  • More Digital.ai Release Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is a free product."
  • "Jenkins is open source."
  • "​It is free.​"
  • "Some of the add-ons are too expensive."
  • "It's free software with a big community behind it, which is very good."
  • "I used the free OSS version all the time. It was enough for all my needs."
  • "Jenkins is open source and free."
  • "There is no cost. It is open source."
  • More Jenkins Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Start with the free tier for a few build configs and see how it works for you, then according to your scale find the enterprise license which fits you the most."
  • "The licensing is on an annual basis."
  • More TeamCity Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis nowadays. The biggest difference upon initial inspection is that TeamCity is far more focused on validating individual commits rather than certain types of tests. Jenkins’ front page presents information that is simply not useful in a non-linear development environment, where people are often working in vastly different directions. How many of the previous tests passed/failed is not really salient information in this kind of situation. Running specific tests for individual commits on TeamCity is far more trivial in terms of interface complexity than Jenkins. TeamCity just involves clicking the ”…” button in the corner on any test type (although I wish it wasn’t so easy to click “Run” by accident). I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins out of the box. There’s a point at which you feel that if you have to scour the documentation to do anything remotely complex in an application, you’re dealing with a bad interface. One disappointing thing in both is that inter-branch merges improperly trigger e-mails to unrelated committers. I suppose it is fairly difficult to determine who to notify about failure in situations like these, though. It seems like TeamCity pulls up the… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution can apply one template across multiple applications.
    Top Answer:The solution's license includes all features. I have not compared pricing to other tools, but feel the solution is a… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is a little bit expensive.
    Top Answer:When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your… more »
    Top Answer:Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.
    Top Answer:TeamCity is a very user-friendly tool.
    Top Answer:It's open source, however, if you want your solution to be deployed on their cloud or on the cloud in general without… more »
    Top Answer:It's just a tool that I used. I needed to deliver something, so I did. I wasn't looking at it in a way to criticize it… more »
    Ranking
    10th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    774
    Comparisons
    419
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    621
    Rating
    9.0
    2nd
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    6,896
    Comparisons
    5,921
    Reviews
    39
    Average Words per Review
    386
    Rating
    7.8
    6th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    3,373
    Comparisons
    2,977
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    574
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    GitLab logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    AWS CodePipeline logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    IBM Rational Build Forge logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Chef logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    GitLab logo
    Compared 45% of the time.
    CircleCI logo
    Compared 17% of the time.
    Harness logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Also Known As
    XL Release, XebiaLabs XL Release
    Learn More
    Overview

    Automate, orchestrate, and gain visibility into your release pipelines at scale using Digital.ai Release, a release management tool that is designed for enterprises. Control and track releases, standardize processes, and bake compliance and security into your software release pipelines.

    Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

    TeamCity is a Continuous Integration and Deployment server that provides out-of-the-box continuous unit testing, code quality analysis, and early reporting on build problems. A simple installation process lets you deploy TeamCity and start improving your release management practices in a matter of minutes. TeamCity supports Java, .NET and Ruby development and integrates perfectly with major IDEs, version control systems, and issue tracking systems.

    Sample Customers
    3M, GE, John Deere, Deutsche Telekom, Cable & Wireless, Xerox, and Société Générale, Liberty Mutual, EA, Rabobank
    Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox
    Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization45%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Insurance Company4%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company23%
    Media Company9%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Non Tech Company7%
    Media Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business6%
    Midsize Enterprise48%
    Large Enterprise46%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.