GitLab vs Jenkins vs TeamCity comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitLab Logo
9,891 views|7,811 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Jenkins Logo
6,896 views|5,921 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
JetBrains Logo
3,373 views|2,977 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GitLab, Jenkins, and TeamCity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It scales well.""The dashboard and interface make it easy to use.""The stability is good.""GitLab is kind of an image of GitHub, so it gives us the flexibility to monitor our changes in the repos.""GitLab's best feature is Actions.""A user friendly solution.""GitLab integrates well with other platforms.""I like that you can use GitLab as a double-sided solution for both DevOps and version management. It's a good product for working in these two areas, and the user interface makes it easy to understand."

More GitLab Pros →

"The solution is scalable and has a large number of plugins that can help you scale it to your needs.""Automation of chores like deployment, frequent manual tasks (like running scripts on test and production systems) reduced the time used and the number of errors made by engineers, freeing them to do meaningful work instead.""Jenkins has a lot of built-in packages and tools.""We significantly reduced build times of large projects (more than 80k lines of Scala code) using build time on Jenkins as a time sample. It reduced the developer write-test-commit cycle time, and increased productivity.""The initial setup is pretty simple.""I love Jenkins. I like that you work on anything, and you make anything. Jenkins is very important for my team. I am satisfied with the product.""A lot of support material exists via a single web search of exactly what you're looking for.""We are using the open-source version and there is a lot of plugins and features that are available and it works on agents for free. In other solutions, it will cost extra to use them with the agent."

More Jenkins Pros →

"Time to deployment has been reduced in situations where we want to deploy to production or deploy breaking changes.""Good integration with IDE and JetBrains products.""The integration is a valuable feature.""I have not yet implemented the remote build feature, but this will be a big plus. We want to be able to build legacy products on a build agent without developers needing to have obsolete tool sets installed on their local PC.""It's easy to move to a new release because of templates and meta-runners, and agent pooling.""The flexibility of TeamCity allows it to fit in workflows that I have yet to imagine.""TeamCity is very useful due to the fact that it has a strong plug-in system.""The most valuable aspect of the solution is its easy configuration. It also has multiple plugins that can be used especially for building .net applications."

More TeamCity Pros →

Cons
"I've noticed an area for improvement in GitLab, particularly needing to go through many steps to push the code to the repository. Resolving that issue would make the product better. My team quickly fixed it by writing a small script, then double-clicking or enabling the script to take care of the issue. However, that quick fix was from my team and not the GitLab team, so in the next release, if an automatic deployment feature would be available in GitLab, then that would be good because, in Visual Studio, you can do that with just one click of a button.""The solution should again offer an on-premises deployment option.""It's more related to the supporting layer of features, such as issue management and issue tracking. We tend to always use, for example, Jira next to it. That doesn't mean that GitLab should build something similar to Jira because that will always have its place, but they could grow a bit in those kinds of supporting features. I see some, for example, covering ITSM on a DevOps team level, and that's one of the things that I and my current client would find really helpful. It's understandably not going to be their main focus and their core, and whenever you are with a company that needs a bit more advanced features on that specific topic, you're probably still going to integrate with another tool like Jira Service Management, for example. However, some basic features on things like that could be really helpful.""For as long as I have used GitLab, I haven't encountered any major limitations. However, I think that perhaps the search functionality could be better.""Some of the scripts that we encountered in GitLab were not fully functional and threw up errors.""I would like to have some features to support peer review.""The solution should be more cloud-native and have more cloud-native capabilities and features.""We would like to have easier tutorials. Their tutorials are too technical for a user to understand. They should be more detailed but less technical."

More GitLab Cons →

"Jenkins could have better cloud functionality. Currently, we are using the existing legacy model, but we are moving toward the cloud, so it would be great if they could improve in that area. In the future, I would like more cloud features and related training materials, like a video tutorial.""The documentation could be more friendly, and more examples of how to use it.""There are some difficulties when we need to execute the DB script.""Upgrading and maintaining plugins can be painful, as sometimes upgrading a plugin can break functionality of another plugin that a job is dependent on.""Logging could be improved to offer a clearer view.""The bug fix speed is very slow.""Jenkins could improve by adding the ability to edit test automation and make time planning better because it is difficult. It should be easier to do.""A more user-friendly UI for creating pipelines would be helpful."

More Jenkins Cons →

"Their online documentation is fairly extensive, but sometimes you can end up navigating in circles to find answers. I would like them (or partner with someone)​ to provide training classes to help newcomers get things up and running more quickly.""REST API support lacks many features in customization of builds, jobs, and settings.""If there was more documentation that was easier to locate, it would be helpful for users.""I need some more graphical design.""The UI for this solution could be improved. New users don't find it easy to navigate. The need some level of training to understand the ins and the outs.""We've called TeamCity tech support. Unfortunately, all their tech support is based in Europe, so we end up with such a big time crunch that I now need to have one person in the US.""If TeamCity could create more out of the box solutions to make it more user friendly and create more use cases, that would be ideal.""The upgrade process could be smoother. Upgrading major versions can often cause some pain."

More TeamCity Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."
  • "The price is okay."
  • "It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."
  • "Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."
  • "It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."
  • "I don't mind the price because I use the free version."
  • "We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."
  • "The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."
  • More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is a free product."
  • "Jenkins is open source."
  • "​It is free.​"
  • "Some of the add-ons are too expensive."
  • "It's free software with a big community behind it, which is very good."
  • "I used the free OSS version all the time. It was enough for all my needs."
  • "Jenkins is open source and free."
  • "There is no cost. It is open source."
  • More Jenkins Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Start with the free tier for a few build configs and see how it works for you, then according to your scale find the enterprise license which fits you the most."
  • "The licensing is on an annual basis."
  • More TeamCity Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis nowadays. The biggest difference upon initial inspection is that TeamCity is far more focused on validating individual commits rather than certain types of tests. Jenkins’ front page presents information that is simply not useful in a non-linear development environment, where people are often working in vastly different directions. How many of the previous tests passed/failed is not really salient information in this kind of situation. Running specific tests for individual commits on TeamCity is far more trivial in terms of interface complexity than Jenkins. TeamCity just involves clicking the ”…” button in the corner on any test type (although I wish it wasn’t so easy to click “Run” by accident). I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins out of the box. There’s a point at which you feel that if you have to scour the documentation to do anything remotely complex in an application, you’re dealing with a bad interface. One disappointing thing in both is that inter-branch merges improperly trigger e-mails to unrelated committers. I suppose it is fairly difficult to determine who to notify about failure in situations like these, though. It seems like TeamCity pulls up the… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool helps to integrate CI/CD pipeline deployments. It is very easy to learn. Its security model is good.
    Top Answer:GitLab could consider introducing a code-scanning tool. Purchasing such tools from external markets can incur charges… more »
    Top Answer:When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your… more »
    Top Answer:Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.
    Top Answer:TeamCity is a very user-friendly tool.
    Top Answer:It's open source, however, if you want your solution to be deployed on their cloud or on the cloud in general without… more »
    Top Answer:It's just a tool that I used. I needed to deliver something, so I did. I wasn't looking at it in a way to criticize it… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    9,891
    Comparisons
    7,811
    Reviews
    50
    Average Words per Review
    402
    Rating
    8.6
    2nd
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    6,896
    Comparisons
    5,921
    Reviews
    39
    Average Words per Review
    386
    Rating
    7.8
    6th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    3,373
    Comparisons
    2,977
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    574
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Microsoft Azure DevOps logo
    Compared 48% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    AWS CodePipeline logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    GitHub CoPilot logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    AWS CodePipeline logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    IBM Rational Build Forge logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Digital.ai Release  logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    CircleCI logo
    Compared 17% of the time.
    Harness logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    GitHub Actions logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Fuzzit
    Learn More
    Overview

    GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster. 

    It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring. 

    With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

    Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

    TeamCity is a Continuous Integration and Deployment server that provides out-of-the-box continuous unit testing, code quality analysis, and early reporting on build problems. A simple installation process lets you deploy TeamCity and start improving your release management practices in a matter of minutes. TeamCity supports Java, .NET and Ruby development and integrates perfectly with major IDEs, version control systems, and issue tracking systems.

    Sample Customers
    1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
    Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox
    Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization25%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company23%
    Media Company9%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Hospitality Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise52%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.