We performed a comparison between OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise, and Tricentis Flood based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools."The product’s most valuable feature is the Vuser license; it allows us to reduce the cost as per requirement."
"The reports are very relevant to the customers’ expectations."
"Keeping up with DevOps, thus the best feature of StormRunner is that we don't have to build and maintain infrastructure anymore."
"The solution is easy to use."
"OpenText LoadRunner Cloud eliminates the need for our own testing infrastructure when running tests."
"The product supports a wide variety of technology compared to any other tool."
"One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols."
"It's fast, easy to use, has a user-friendly UI, and you can split users."
"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Is very user-friendly."
"We have a centralized delivery team and we are able to meet enterprise requirements, which include different types of protocols that are involved, including scripting. The technology supports that and enables us to have a wider range of testing. Enterprise-level testing is something that we are satisfied with."
"IP Spoofing can be done using Performance Center."
"This is a product that has a lot of capabilities and is the most mature tool of its kind in the market."
"I think the number one feature everybody likes is the capability to easily generate virtual users as well as the reporting."
"I like how you can make modifications to the script on LoadRunner Enterprise. You don't have to go into the IDE itself."
"The most valuable part of the product is the way you can scale the basic testing easily."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature is the support for Java, where we can quickly code what we need."
"You can utilize this tool on the cloud, and also access application on-premises. That is a very good part of the solution."
"Their technical support is awesome."
"There is a steep learning curve for the product, too."
"Reporting and analysis need improvement. Compared to the old school LoadRunner Windows application, the reporting and analysis are mediocre in LoadRunner Cloud."
"Its scripting features need improvement."
"Scriptless automation is an area that can be improved."
"CI/CD integration could be a little bit better. When there's a test and if you see that there are high response times in the test itself, it would be great to be able to send an alert. It would give a heads-up to the architect community or ops community."
"It doesn't provide custom reports. You can only use the default reports which contain irrelevant data or is missing data that we need."
"Improvements to the reporting would be good."
"The support team provides delayed responses."
"The process of upgrading LoadRunner can be difficult and time-consuming."
"The TruClient protocol works well but it takes a lot of memory to run those tests, which is something that can be improved."
"The support team needs to be more coordinated."
"Sometimes, the code is not generated when we record the scripts in the backend."
"It's not that popular on the cloud."
"I believe the data that demonstrates the automated correlations should be corrected."
"The installation has not been straightforward, and we have had so many problems. We have had to re-install, try to install on a different machine, etc. We have not been able to launch the LRE server itself yet."
"They need to focus on minimizing the cost."
"The performance of the tool needs to improve."
"We used an implementation strategy to deploy the solution, not because of the tools, but mainly because of the scripting part of the tool."
"The solution is quite immature, it is not in an optimal state."
More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →