OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise vs Tricentis Flood comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise, and Tricentis Flood based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Load Testing Tools Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product’s most valuable feature is the Vuser license; it allows us to reduce the cost as per requirement.""The reports are very relevant to the customers’ expectations.""Keeping up with DevOps, thus the best feature of StormRunner is that we don't have to build and maintain infrastructure anymore.""The solution is easy to use.""OpenText LoadRunner Cloud eliminates the need for our own testing infrastructure when running tests.""The product supports a wide variety of technology compared to any other tool.""One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols.""It's fast, easy to use, has a user-friendly UI, and you can split users."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Pros →

"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Is very user-friendly.""We have a centralized delivery team and we are able to meet enterprise requirements, which include different types of protocols that are involved, including scripting. The technology supports that and enables us to have a wider range of testing. Enterprise-level testing is something that we are satisfied with.""IP Spoofing can be done using Performance Center.""This is a product that has a lot of capabilities and is the most mature tool of its kind in the market.""I think the number one feature everybody likes is the capability to easily generate virtual users as well as the reporting.""I like how you can make modifications to the script on LoadRunner Enterprise. You don't have to go into the IDE itself.""The most valuable part of the product is the way you can scale the basic testing easily.""The product is very user-friendly."

More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Pros →

"The most valuable feature is the support for Java, where we can quickly code what we need.""You can utilize this tool on the cloud, and also access application on-premises. That is a very good part of the solution.""Their technical support is awesome."

More Tricentis Flood Pros →

Cons
"There is a steep learning curve for the product, too.""Reporting and analysis need improvement. Compared to the old school LoadRunner Windows application, the reporting and analysis are mediocre in LoadRunner Cloud.""Its scripting features need improvement.""Scriptless automation is an area that can be improved.""CI/CD integration could be a little bit better. When there's a test and if you see that there are high response times in the test itself, it would be great to be able to send an alert. It would give a heads-up to the architect community or ops community.""It doesn't provide custom reports. You can only use the default reports which contain irrelevant data or is missing data that we need.""Improvements to the reporting would be good.""The support team provides delayed responses."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Cons →

"The process of upgrading LoadRunner can be difficult and time-consuming.""The TruClient protocol works well but it takes a lot of memory to run those tests, which is something that can be improved.""The support team needs to be more coordinated.""Sometimes, the code is not generated when we record the scripts in the backend.""It's not that popular on the cloud.""I believe the data that demonstrates the automated correlations should be corrected.""The installation has not been straightforward, and we have had so many problems. We have had to re-install, try to install on a different machine, etc. We have not been able to launch the LRE server itself yet.""They need to focus on minimizing the cost."

More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Cons →

"The performance of the tool needs to improve.""We used an implementation strategy to deploy the solution, not because of the tools, but mainly because of the scripting part of the tool.""The solution is quite immature, it is not in an optimal state."

More Tricentis Flood Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward."
  • "There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."
  • "We make use of virtual user hours. We buy time in the LoadRunner Cloud. It costs around $80,000."
  • "Pricing is dependent on what you're referring to. If you're talking about the cloud, it's likely competitive. However, if you're talking about the on-premise version, professional or enterprise licenses are required. Prices are on the high side. They are not cheap."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "It is expensive compared to other tools."
  • "LoadRunner always had expensive pricing. At my company, we used to evaluate LoadRunner, but we stuck with Silk Performer because its pricing was always better in the past. I do feel that I got a fair deal this time. Our value-added reseller and our sales guy worked hard to give us a fair deal. I feel that we got a fair deal. We did not go for the pay-as-you-go deal. I did an upfront package. I prefer that. I want to know what my costs are."
  • "The solution’s price is considerably high."
  • More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "For Performance Center, you have to add additional load generators, and then you can do more. I think it is a matter of the price, in terms of how many machines you can buy."
  • "It does everything you could hope for in a performance testing solution. It's not cheap."
  • "It is a bit expensive when compared with other tools."
  • "ROI is 200%."
  • "It is a bit expensive, especially for smaller organizations, but over-all it can save you money."
  • "The price is okay. You're able to buy it, as opposed to paying for a full year."
  • "They have a much more practical pricing model now."
  • "I have not been directly involved in price negotiations but my understanding is that while the cost is a little bit high, it provides good value for the money."
  • More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This solution is in the average price range compared to other testing tools."
  • "The only positive point is it came free with my test automation tool."
  • More Tricentis Flood Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing… more »
    Top Answer:One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols.
    Top Answer:The solution is a bit expensive. The pay-as-you-go model offered by LoadRunner Cloud is important to us, especially when… more »
    Top Answer:The tool is very easy to set up and get running.
    Top Answer:OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise needs to improve reporting.
    Top Answer:Tricentis Flood is the kind of versatile load and performance testing solution that my organization and I cannot help… more »
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 25 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    4,795
    Comparisons
    2,901
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    602
    Rating
    8.6
    5th
    out of 25 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    4,751
    Comparisons
    2,732
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    632
    Rating
    8.4
    18th
    out of 25 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    510
    Comparisons
    380
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load
    Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, Micro Focus Performance Center, HPE Performance Center
    Flood IO
    Learn More
    Overview
    Do your performance and load testing in the cloud. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud makes it easy to plan, run, and scale performance tests without the need to deploy and manage infrastructure.

    Your globally distributed performance testing teams have the responsibility of driving quality acrossyour enterprise while testing a broad range of application types, managing costs and deploying applications that meet the performance requirements of your business. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise delivers a collaborative testing platform that reduces complexity, centralizes resources and leverages shared assets and licenses to increase consistency across your enterprise.

    Tricentis Flood is a cloud-based platform for load testing that assists teams in determining how their applications respond to loads that are distributed across the world. This solution makes load testing more accessible to developers and testers by lowering the complexity typically connected with it. By adding load testing into their CI/CD pipelines, teams can start testing the performance of their application components as they develop and continuously track the effects on the system's overall performance.

    Tricentis Flood enables DevOps load testing. In addition, it enables DevTest teams to get quick and continuous performance feedback. Because Tricentis Flood and Tosca are integrated, you can use the same scriptless tests you use for functional testing to perform load testing. In addition to supporting conventional protocol-level load-testing techniques, Tricentis Flood also enables testers to do load tests at the browser level without becoming bogged down in technical specifics.

    As new features are being developed, teams can begin load testing them. Without having to deal with the headaches of requesting, setting, or managing performance resources on premises or in the cloud, a developer or tester can rapidly produce millions of globally dispersed requests per second from their local PC.

    Tricentis Flood distributes test plans over widely accessible cloud servers using open-source tools like JMeter, Gatling, and Selenium. Additionally, it enables you to instantly "flood" any HTTP endpoint.

    Tricentis Flood Features

    Tricentis Flood has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • The Browser Level User method reduces script generation, maintenance, and complexity overheads.
    • Tosca Flood integration, enabling seamless load testing for both UI and API-based test scenarios.
    • Enhanced economy of scale with cloud-based load generation across multiple global geographic locations.
    • Tool-agnostic, with the ability to integrate with new tools as they become available.
    • Cluster-less, shared-nothing architecture, which allows users to scale up for very large tests without the bottlenecks that more traditional setups experience.
    • Real-time reports on a shareable, intuitive, and interactive dashboard.
    • Long-term data storage allows you to evaluate performance over time.
    • Test-friendly pricing, where you pay for the infrastructure you utilize, not per test or per simulated user.

    Tricentis Flood Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing Tricentis Flood. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Simple methods for defining, creating, and maintaining load tests.
    • On-demand platform for executing load tests at scale.
    • Analysis and visualization of results in real time.
    • Continuous monitoring of performance across time.

    Sample Customers
    Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant
    Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue
    Nike, heroku, Soulcycle, NEC, boston.com, Typeform, Xero, Telus
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Educational Organization22%
    Retailer11%
    Government11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Retailer11%
    Energy/Utilities Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Insurance Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Retailer10%
    Real Estate/Law Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise68%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise76%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise80%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise76%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Load Testing Tools
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.