Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
6,661 views|5,683 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Google Logo
1,858 views|1,264 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Amazon S3 Glacier, and Google Cloud Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Nasuni, Google and others in Cloud Storage.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Storage Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most beneficial feature of the product for data storage stems from the fact that it serves as a shared file storage.""We are not that big of a cloud user. We just use it for the storage of our bytes. The most valuable aspect is the storage.""The solution is scalable.""We can run code and deploy it whenever we want.""I appreciate Amazon's extensive range of services, which makes it a favorable choice.""The solution's technical support is good.""The initial setup was straightforward.""EFS is flexible."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Pros →

"Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly stable solution.""I like the price. If you compare Glacier to others, the prices in terms of what you store beyond retention are much lower.""We get free credits from Amazon, and we like the overall stability. We haven't had to rely heavily on their customer success teams, which is a good sign.""The solution is stable.""The main advantage of Glacier is its low cost. It is incredibly cheaper than other storage options, especially for objects you don't access frequently. Glacier would add value if you have a staging area for objects you only need to access occasionally. Since we have data in terabytes between S3 buckets, we can significantly reduce our storage and cost footprint by using Glacier.""The reliability of storage is the main benefit.""The solution is easy to use.""Amazon S3 Glacier can integrate seamlessly with other AWS services."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Pros →

"The performance is good.""It's simple to use.""I have more than enough personal storage and have had no security issues.""It's easy to use.""The most valuable features are the ease and accessibility of information.""The feature we've found most valuable is the ability to access our data anywhere, anytime.""It is seamlessly integrated with your Android. There’s no fuss, no hassle.""It's easy to use."

More Google Cloud Storage Pros →

Cons
"The lack of transparency in the costs attached to the product is an area of concern where improvements are required.""The interface seems strange and complicated.""The user activity needs to be more connected.""It should be simplified. There are people who don't have cloud experience. It should be storage that we are able to just connect to.""Specifically, when it comes to the file system for the learning system, we encountered performance issues with both Azure and AWS.""When we faced some issues, the support team took a lot of time to resolve them.""Its deployment process could be faster while installing the Python package directly into the environment.""It could be better in connecting with Windows Server instances."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Cons →

"The learning curve is very high.""The solution's cost optimization could be improved.""Technical support needs improvement. Previously, even though we had premium and enterprise support, the response time would be quicker if we ran into issues, but now it is slowed down. The analytical dashboard feature, like the CloudOps dashboard, should be included in the next release of the Amazon S3 Glacier.""A couple of times, we faced outage issues that caused us problems.""I would like to see the retrieval time reduced.""I would like to see improved storage capacity and enhanced security features for better protection.""Although Amazon S3 Glacier is cheap, its data retrieval cost is very high compared to other solutions.""The stability must be improved."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Cons →

"Google Cloud Storage could improve by being more user-friendly.""I would like more storage available.""Google Cloud Storage could be improved by increasing the drive capacity.""Having more storage space would be an improvement.""It was not easy to reach the storage because there were different network zones.""The user experience needs to be simplified.""It is hard to migrate to another product if we want to.""The solution should have two factor authentication."

More Google Cloud Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It has flexible pricing. You are charged based on your storage."
  • "The solution's price is mid-ranged."
  • "I would rate the pricing 7 out of 10."
  • "The product's price depends on the services and the size and capacity at which it is used in a business environment."
  • More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is much cheaper than competing products."
  • "There is no license, you pay for what you use."
  • "The solution is cost-effective."
  • "The product is cheap."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is expensive."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is a cost-effective solution for archiving."
  • "The pricing must be improved."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is very cheap, but the cost becomes a concern when you have a very large amount of data."
  • More Amazon S3 Glacier Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "They know that the pricing is comparable with Azure, AWS, and those other solutions like Amazon are cheaper, but they are not as flexible."
  • "Better pricing would be helpful."
  • "Its price is fine."
  • "It's about nearly $10,000 USD to use the services on GCP, however, Google gave us a good deal which is why we originally went with them."
  • "The solution is free."
  • "They have recently changed their pricing structures, it used to be free but now it is a paid service. However, I am on a monthly subscription and the price is reasonable."
  • "The price could be cheaper."
  • "The price of the license could be cheaper. We are on an annual subscription."
  • More Google Cloud Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to… more »
    Top Answer:We can run code and deploy it whenever we want.
    Top Answer:The product's price depends on the services and the size and capacity at which it is used in a business environment.
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage… more »
    Top Answer:Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly scalable and available solution.
    Top Answer:The solution's cloud storage is very expensive, and users may not be able to afford cloud storage.
    Top Answer:The pricing is nominal for us as we are a charitable organization. We pay a monthly subscription fee.
    Top Answer:The solution’s stability could be improved.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Cloud Storage
    Views
    6,661
    Comparisons
    5,683
    Reviews
    30
    Average Words per Review
    350
    Rating
    8.7
    3rd
    out of 48 in Cloud Storage
    Views
    1,858
    Comparisons
    1,264
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    330
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Amazon Glacier
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides simple, scalable file storage for use with Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud. Amazon EFS is easy to use and offers a simple interface that allows you to create and configure file systems quickly and easily. With Amazon EFS, storage capacity is elastic, growing and shrinking automatically as you add and remove files, so your applications have the storage they need, when they need it.

    When mounted to Amazon EC2 instances, an Amazon EFS file system provides a standard file system interface and file system access semantics, allowing you to seamlessly integrate Amazon EFS with your existing applications and tools. Multiple Amazon EC2 instances can access an Amazon EFS file system at the same time, allowing Amazon EFS to provide a common data source for workloads and applications running on more than one Amazon EC2 instance.

    It’s designed for high availability and durability, and provides performance for a broad spectrum of workloads and applications, including Big Data and analytics, media processing workflows, content management, web serving, and home directories.

    Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

    Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.

    Sample Customers
    Arcesium, Atlassian, Seeking Alpha, Zend
    King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud
    1. Adobe 2. Airbnb 3. Amazon 4. Apple 5. AT&T 6. Baidu 7. Cisco 8. Coca-Cola 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. Ford 13. Google 13. HP 14. IBM 15. Intel 16. JPMorgan Chase 17. LinkedIn 18. Lyft 19. Microsoft 20. Netflix 21. Nike 22. Oracle 23. PayPal 24. Pinterest 25. Qualcomm 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Tesla 29. Toyota 30. Twitter 31. Visa 32. Walmart 33. WeWork
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Educational Organization13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company42%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    Wholesaler/Distributor4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization29%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Educational Organization8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization63%
    Computer Software Company6%
    Retailer5%
    Comms Service Provider3%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business56%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise59%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business58%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise26%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise37%
    Large Enterprise45%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise67%
    Large Enterprise23%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Storage
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Nasuni, Google and others in Cloud Storage. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.