RedSeal vs Tufin Orchestration Suite vs iBwave Wi-Fi comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
iBwave Logo
1,601 views|980 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
RedSeal Logo
31 views|23 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Tufin Logo
12,176 views|7,128 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between iBwave Wi-Fi, RedSeal, and Tufin Orchestration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Ekahau, NetAlly, iBwave and others in Network Modeling and Simulation.
To learn more, read our detailed Network Modeling and Simulation Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"iBwave Wi-Fi's tech support is great. They pick up their phones. I have no complaints.""The stability and feature set of the application are top notch and can't be matched.""I find the high-quality Heatmap generation, multi-floor, and wire mapping features to be most valuable.""The solution's 3D imaging is amazing.""Compared to other tools, iBwave Wi-Fi provides 95% accuracy and generates heatmaps.""The 3D Coverage is a good feature that shows the signal propagation in three dimensions.""It can speed up design."

More iBwave Wi-Fi Pros →

"This is the only solution in the world that gives you a digital resilience score.""RedSeal integrates the network and gives us a visual or graphical overview of our network. If an organization is geographically dispersed, for instance, with one office in Canada and one office in the Philippines, the whole network, including all devices, is integrated into RedSeal, and you can see from where the traffic is going in and out.""The most valuable features are network mapping and configuration."

More RedSeal Pros →

"There are a lot of benefits to using the reporting. It gives us duplicate objects, duplicate services, shadow firewall rules, and the firewall rules not needed for a given number of days or months.""The most valuable feature are role and objects usage for individual objects and app usage.""SecureChange is the most interesting part. It all comes down to having the user request firewall access and SecureChange, based on workflows, takes care of it, sending two or three emails to the business approvers. With one click, you can automate a firewall rule.""It is a great solution. If you have all the devices and firewalls in place, the amount of details that you get along with the network topology is very good.""Tufin is our audit trail for all changes. We have to be PCI compliant, and it's the tool we go to for enforcing PCI on the network side.""The visibility is very good. We have managers who are overseeing it, and they are approving things through it.""Tufin is the only multi-vendor firewall tool that is available, and it helps to bring everything together and report on what all of the rules are.""The most valuable feature is that it extends security entries in the firewall policies."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite Pros →

Cons
"Areas of improvement would include more functionality in the Mobile App, expanded reporting features, and some shortcut features.""It would be good if we could involve a visual while designing the backhaul.""iBwave Wi-Fi doesn't have a distributor feed platform.""I am currently looking for an alternative due to my reluctance with the reliability of this product.""The cost of the solution could be improved. It's extraordinarily expensive.""I would like to be able to see two buildings at the same time so that you can create a campus view.""It would do iBwave well to become more involved with their clients."

More iBwave Wi-Fi Cons →

"One of the areas of concern is the GUI. It is important to our customers that the GUI looks beautiful. It's a Java Client, so you have a Java dependency.""The dashboard should be improved to make correlating data easier to do.""Sometimes, it required us to refresh the configuration. When we integrated any of the configurations into the device, sometimes, it could not detect the exact picture of that device. So, we had to reset the device to see that if it was giving true-positive results or false-positive results. In some cases, we were not able to get true-positive results. There was some kind of bug in that version. Its interface is not user-friendly and needs to be improved. It takes time to understand the interface and various options. Skybox has quite a user-friendly interface. They could provide a feature for compliance audit policy if it is already not there. A compliance audit policy ensures that all configurations are based on the best practices standards, such as CIS benchmarks standard or other similar standards. It provides visibility about whether your device configuration is based on best practices or not. Usually, such a feature is provided by other solutions such as Meteor or Tenable Nessus."

More RedSeal Cons →

"It does not natively support all of the Check Point functions which is a big deal.""I would rate their reports as a four out of ten. I don't like the way that they are shown. It is too hard to export and send them to our clients.""There were some hiccups here and there with the initial setup.""A big improvement would be on the USP policy. If we could use Palo Alto to take those zone names and auto import them into the policy, then just do the policy based on the zone names instead of having to put in every single subnet.""I would like the application to have faster response times. E.g., the dashboard may take up to two minutes to load. Or, when we do the topology seating its two and a half hours. I would like to get those times down and increase the efficiency of the product there.""My worry with Tufin is that it cannot connect to Fortinet, which is what I want to do.""The GUI needs more visibility in terms of licensing because it is hard to tell which products and licensed and which are not.""We were just talking to them about usage for the F5 platform. They will not be going after specific environments, but a more OpenAPI. They will have other companies write it, etc. It's a little different than I had expected."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I advise others to treat the cost as you would any tooling cost and use the monthly option as needed."
  • "The solution's pricing is cheap."
  • "iBwave Wi-Fi is an expensive solution, but it is worth the cost."
  • More iBwave Wi-Fi Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is based on the number of endpoints and devices, and we have seen it range from mid-five figures to low six figures."
  • More RedSeal Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This solution helped us to reduce the time it takes to make changes. We used to spend up to an hour to do a change, and now, it's around five minutes."
  • "Tufin and AlgoSec were pretty much in the competitive price range, but this one provided us better integration into the Check Point environment."
  • "The solution has helped us to reduce the time it takes to make changes. With Tufin, it takes ten to 15 minutes. Before, it was 30 minutes or more."
  • "The solution has helped reduce the time it takes us to make changes. It helps make overall integrated changes immediately. It allows us to cut down at least a few hours in the week in regards to changes and monitoring."
  • "We've seen a decrease of about 50 percent in the overall time it takes to complete a firewall change."
  • "Tufin makes things a little easier. It lessens the amount of manual work which we have to do. It has a lot of benefits in terms of revenues, profits, employee costs, and operational costs. We have already seen return on investment."
  • "This solution helps us reduce the time it takes us to make changes. We're probably saving time by 25%."
  • "Tufin reduced the time it takes to solve a problem, which reduces the time of the outage."
  • More Tufin Orchestration Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Modeling and Simulation solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Compared to other tools, iBwave Wi-Fi provides 95% accuracy and generates heatmaps.
    Top Answer:iBwave Wi-Fi is an expensive solution, but it is worth the cost.
    Top Answer:It would be good if we could involve a visual while designing the backhaul.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Tufin is security auditing. We are able to check the rules and compliance of the company… more »
    Top Answer:Tuffin is expensive, and we have to explain to our customers the benefit for them to purchase. If we explain the… more »
    Top Answer:The reporting function could improve in Tufin. For our clients with companies that have strong compliance, reporting… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,601
    Comparisons
    980
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    369
    Rating
    9.5
    Views
    31
    Comparisons
    23
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    12,176
    Comparisons
    7,128
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    444
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tufin SecureCloud
    Learn More
    Overview

    iBwave has been the industry standard software for designing indoor wireless network for over 13 years. Used by hundreds of operators, OEMs, enterprises and system integrators around the world. The iBwave Wi-Fi Suite is a powerful Wi-Fi network design solution that gives you a significantly more productive way to design carrier-grade indoor Wi-Fi networks. Consisting of a mobile app, a powerful PC based software and 10GB of cloud connectivity to easily share and synchronize project information.

    Key Features include:

    • Advanced 3D Predictive design
    • Advanced capacity planning
    • Calibrated prediction for extremely accurate prediction results
    • Ability to model incline surfaces
    • Comprehensive reporting
    • Cloud connectivity to easily share and access projects anytime
    • Free read-only project viewer for customers and project partners

    RedSeal’s network modeling and risk scoring platform builds an accurate, up-to-date model of an organization’s entire, as-built network to visualize access paths, prioritize what to fix, so you can target existing cybersecurity resources to protect your most valuable assets. With RedSeal’s Digital Resilience Score, decision makers can see the security status and benchmark progress toward digital resilience.

    Tufin enables organizations to automate their security policy visibility, risk management, provisioning and compliance across their multi-vendor, hybrid environment. Customers gain visibility and control across their network, ensure continuous compliance with security standards and embed security enforcement into workflows and development pipelines. 

    Sample Customers
    ARRIS
    United States Postal Service, Pacific Gas and Electric Co., Interval International
    3M, AT&T, Blue Cross Blue Shield, BNP Parabas, ConocoPhillips, Deutsche Bank, GE, IBM, Pfizer, United States Postal Service 
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider38%
    Media Company13%
    Construction Company13%
    Non Tech Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government8%
    Construction Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government21%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Healthcare Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Retailer6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business64%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise21%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise64%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise75%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise79%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Modeling and Simulation
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Ekahau, NetAlly, iBwave and others in Network Modeling and Simulation. Updated: March 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.