We performed a comparison between CyberArk Identity, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, and Okta Workforce Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients."
"The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security."
"CyberArk Identity is a mature product."
"I found the solution to be stable."
"The setup, via cloud, is simple."
"The tool helps with authentication. It acts as an MFA for any kind of privileged access that occurs in our organization."
"I like the RBAC (Role-Based Access Control). It basically involves defining various roles, and then simply assigning those roles to users."
"The user identification is simplified, and managing user privileges, whether adding or revoking them, is also quite straightforward when utilizing CyberArk SaaS."
"The most valuable feature is the flexibility in using the SMS messages."
"The first valuable feature is being able to see everything on one platform. This includes logs and authentication failure."
"We use this product for SSL two-factor authentication and FortiToken management."
"Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is an easy-to-use solution."
"The current version is stable...Scalability-wise, it is a fine solution"
"FortiAuthenticator is a very good solution. It is all jury-based. FortiAuthenticator is very easy for anyone to understand how it works and be able to take action."
"The solution is very easy to manage."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is RADIUS service and the social network integration feature."
"It is flexible and easy to install."
"Valuable features include UD, SSO functionality, MFA and Adaptive MFA functionality, ability to link multiple Directory databases with UD."
"Workforce Identity's best features include its user-friendliness and easy setup."
"The most valuable feature in Okta Workforce Identity is the single sign-on, universal directory, and lifecycle management."
"This solution has a lot of capabilities and features."
"First of all, the solution is very simple."
"We can automate the process of adding users to Okta if they are activated in Active Directory, or if they are added to the database of applications or Active Directory in the last couple of days."
"One of the features that I have found to be very valuable is its interoperability and compatibility with all types of resources, whether it's networking, infrastructure, or applications. That is, it is compatible as well as interoperable, as far as the federated authentication is concerned."
"We would like to see an improvement in the ability to manage mobile devices."
"More integrations would be better."
"The solution's difficulty in gaining skill sets should be improved because it's a vertical product."
"The tool has issues with the third-party SMS gateway. The solution has its own SMS gateway. Integration support is a challenge when we don’t use their SMS gateway. The tool also needs to improve its scalability."
"CyberArk Identity's GUI is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"There is room for improvement in documentation. The documentation could be more specific about the changes needed to achieve specific goals."
"The solution could be easier to use and I found it to be very complex involving many steps."
"The user interface could be improved."
"I would like to see more security features in reference to identity login or identity identification."
"The only way the solution could be improved is if it were cheaper."
"The GUI has some shortcomings and can be made better. The GUI is not great."
"Lacks a simplified two-factor authentication process."
"There are some protocols, such as SHA and SHA-2, that are not supported."
"There is a room for improvement. The log is a bit difficult to access, and searching the log codes is also a bit difficult. So it would be much better if, when we open a log, it could provide detailed information about errors, reasons for failure, and such."
"They could expand FortiAuthenticator's capabilities to accommodate a broader range of environments."
"I would like to see some email options for Fortinet FortiAuthenticator."
"The solution can be quite expensive."
"UD attribute mapping, Okta group rules, and dynamic usage could use improvement. It also needs more in-depth functionality and features to integrate with RADIUS solutions."
"This user integration with the Okta integration network could be simplified."
"It only facilitates provisioning and not de-provisioning."
"The solution’s policies are difficult to understand due to the policy methods. They use authentication. The solution’s workflow is also difficult and not very active. They need to have proper documentation on it. In the next release, I would like to see the workflows being more digestible."
"The only area of concern in the solution stems from the fact that my company needs some help regarding the setup phase from a partner."
"The solution is very expensive."
"The solution lacks an on-premises deployment model so it can't offer a hybrid solution. It would be ideal if clients had options that weren't just cloud-based."