Actional Review

Decent tool, needs additional integration with automation tool

Valuable Features:

Pretty flexible, able to handle different approaches to testing and software lifecycle

Room for Improvement:

Not fully integrated with their automation test tool.

Other Advice:

From a testing standpoint, ignoring license and cost issues, it's not a bad product. You can use it to organize releases, maintain test cases, and provide management with some decent tools. My concern is with Automation integration. While requirement tracking works fine if you have one automated script per requirement, once you create scripts that cover multiple requirements, any failure in the script updates all requirements as failed instead of giving you the option of only failing those requirements that individually failed. I have an open ticket with HP about this. I was looking at OPA, but couldn't find a viable solution. Other than that, I think QC is pretty decent.
**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Find out what your peers are saying about Aurea, AppDynamics, Dotcom-Monitor and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: January 2021.
454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
1 Comment

author avatarit_user4401 (Developer at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees)

This tool is very useful because it offers visibility and in depth statistics into customer service. It makes sure that no transaction data is lost during the entire transaction process. I find it easy manageable for an efficient user.