Aqua Security Review

Good technical support and new releases improve usability issues

What is our primary use case?

We use Aqua Security for the container security features.

How has it helped my organization?

We use Aqua Security across the software development lifecycle.

What is most valuable?

We find the Docker and Kubernetes support for container security most valuable.

What needs improvement?

I would like Aqua Security to look into is the development of a web security portal. That is what I want them to look into next.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using the solution for two and a half years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have thousands of dedicated users. They are pharmacists, healthcare providers, doctors, insurance companies, etc. They are the end users. On our staff are the administrators.

How are customer service and technical support?

The technical support is good. Whenever we open a ticket, the people are quite helpful about it.

How was the initial setup?

Setup was initially complex before the 3.9 version. We were on version 3.7 and it has been a challenge compared to version 3.11. Deployment was done once or twice in a week.

We are using an in-house regiment. For deployment, we are using automation.

What about the implementation team?

We used a reseller to provide quality. He's the guy who we bought the license from initially. He managed the implementation.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate this product between 7 and 8 out of 10 for container security features.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Find out what your peers are saying about Aqua Security, Palo Alto Networks, Sysdig and others in Container Security. Updated: June 2021.
509,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment