ARCON Privileged Access Management Review

Prevents unauthorized authentication changes and improves our security

What is our primary use case?

Privileged access management, to protect privileged access.

How has it helped my organization?

It prevents unauthorized authentication changes and improves our security.

What is most valuable?

Video capture.

What needs improvement?

They need to support all web browsers. At the moment it only supports Explorer, IE. They have to come up with a solution to support all browsers.

For how long have I used the solution?

Three to five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability is fine, it's good actually.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Yes it is scalable, it has capacity to scale up and expand.

How are customer service and technical support?

Tech support is very good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

No previous solution, this is our first.

How was the initial setup?

It's simple.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Pricing and licensing are good, very aggressive.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated three products. CyberArk, ARCON, and one more product but I don't remember the name.

What other advice do I have?

I give it a seven out of 10 because, as I said, it does not support all browsers.

**Disclosure: IT Central Station contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
More ARCON Privileged Access Management reviews from users
Add a Comment
1 Comment

author avatarSanjeet Kumar Bhuyan
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

100% Agree with this.