What is our primary use case?
The primary use case of this solution is for access points. You can look at any site and take the static ID, or the real ID. It's similar to VPN.
With the access point, you take the real ID and install it in the controller, you then access the site with this access point.
We are interior designers and we have many showroom sites, we use the Aruba controller. We have twenty-five Aruba Switches with fifteen to twenty access points.
We are using the 205 and 215 series. The bandwidth is 1gHz.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features are the controller and the access points. Aruba access points have a good transfer rate.
It is powerful for the internet, the GUI is good, the configuration is very good, and it is very easy to use. In contrast, the Cisco configuration does not have a GUI.
Aruba has many features that are very good.
What needs improvement?
Managing Aruba Switches is not as good as Cisco Controller.
The switch needs to be bigger than it is now. Increasing the number of gigabytes in the switch would improve the switch interacting. You can download the DBS or the datasheet to see the switch interacting.
The switch interacting is the transfer of data from the port to the switch.
They should provide training courses for certification, and have it available on the internet.
They need to increase marketing for their products, especially for the solutions that are stable and very hard working. They should plan an event to market this solution.
Aruba could consider opening a training center for engineering, or IT students.
A suggestion would be to see the unit have a configuration switch like SMTP to send an email to the users if the performance is delayed or down. That would be very useful.
In the command line, we can configure in SMTP to send an email alert to the user and the support worldwide, so that they can know about the problem before it happens.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for approximately four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This solution is very stable.
We have two ways to do the configuration. There are the standard way and Care. If you configure Care, we have a controller and things are fine.
We can deploy the configuration by the controller appliance. The access point can be made into a controller.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable.
With many ports, we blended for the first time and we did not face any problems.
You have to have a plan to expand or increase to a table or other devices.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support is okay, I would rate them a four out of five.
We had some issues with resetting the password, it requires a special technique, there is some reconfiguration involved.
The guide on the internet is very helpful and easy. You can do a specific search on the internet describing the error or the problem and you will get a very simple, easy, and quick answer.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have a client who has a nine-story apartment building and in our design, and we researched the internet for different access points.
We presented the client with Cisco and TriCom, but our customer was not satisfied. We then introduced Aruba to the client and he was satisfied with the performance and our design.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward. It only took fifteen minutes to deploy.
It depends on the number of VLAN, or if there are any rules in the switch. This is all according to the configuration and the settings.
We have three engineers helping with the deployment.
What about the implementation team?
We did not use a vendor team to implement this solution. We did it ourselves.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
This solution is not cheap and they don't have a plan to certify it as Cisco does. Cisco is a famous vendor with options for certification.
Aruba does not have a certified license in ARC and CNV. Their certification is for the marketing of the device in Cisco.
The license is annual. If you purchase a switch, you get a one-year free subscription.
Aruba has better pricing than Cisco.
What other advice do I have?
We used and configured Tricom Switches. HP merged with Tricom and the company after that Aruba merged with HP.
The switch became very different, it is good and has a different configuration.
We have had a few problems in our company, we have had some conflicts in the configuration.
Aruba was the first company to introduce access points, as far back as ten years ago.
It's a good product, but it's not equal to Cisco. It's better. I compare it with Cisco and Aruba is a better switch. With Cisco, you buy the name, history, and global branding.
If an engineer or any company ask me about network solutions, I recommend Aruba.
I have some concerns because not many engineers write on the command line in Aruba. Not many engineers know the solution, unlike Cisco, which is well known in the education industry and on the market.
If you can configure the Aruba Switch for the very first time without any issues, then you are a very good engineer, you know the solution.
Aruba Access points, controller, and performance are the best!
I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Which version of this solution are you currently using?