Broadcom Service Virtualization Review

We use it to reduce our development cycle and test for defects in our product.

Valuable Features:

When we previously used CA SV we saw tremendous results, and went live with almost a 0% defect rate.

We use it for Service Visualization and to run tests to validate our services response with the database.

Improvements to My Organization:

With CA SV it took 2.10 minutes as opposed to 210 minutes for a total validation per scenario. This reduced the development cycle time and provided a product with no defects from a QA perspective.

Room for Improvement:

Performance and cost.

Use of Solution:

I used it a year ago and recently started using it again.

Deployment Issues:

CA SV takes up lot of your system resources.

Which version of this solution are you currently using?
**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Broadcom Service Virtualization reviews from users
Learn what your peers think about Broadcom Service Virtualization. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2021.
465,836 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment