When we previously used CA SV we saw tremendous results, and went live with almost a 0% defect rate.
We use it for Service Visualization and to run tests to validate our services response with the database.
When we previously used CA SV we saw tremendous results, and went live with almost a 0% defect rate.
We use it for Service Visualization and to run tests to validate our services response with the database.
With CA SV it took 2.10 minutes as opposed to 210 minutes for a total validation per scenario. This reduced the development cycle time and provided a product with no defects from a QA perspective.
Performance and cost.
I used it a year ago and recently started using it again.
CA SV takes up lot of your system resources.