Cisco Wireless Review

Works reliably but the licensing is expensive

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case for this solution is the provision of standard wireless access.

How has it helped my organization?

Service delivery is critical in our organization. Wireless access has enabled users to be mobile and as a result, more productive.

What is most valuable?

The most important feature for us is the standard service delivery. Once configured correctly, it is 95% reliable.

What needs improvement?

The cost model is expensive. The new licensing has no added value and seems to be Cisco's effort to take advantage of customers.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than ten years.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Add a Comment
Sign Up with Email